0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Top-down estimates of European CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions based on four different inverse models

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          European CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are estimated for 2006 and 2007 using four independent inverse modelling systems, based on different global and regional Eulerian and Lagrangian transport models. This ensemble approach is designed to provide more realistic estimates of the overall uncertainties in the derived emissions, which is particularly important for verifying bottom-up emission inventories. <br><br> We use continuous observations from 10 European stations (including five tall towers) for CH<sub>4</sub> and 9 continuous stations for N<sub>2</sub>O, complemented by additional European and global flask sampling sites. The available observations mainly constrain CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from north-western and eastern Europe. The inversions are strongly driven by the observations and the derived total emissions of larger countries show little dependence on the emission inventories used a priori. <br><br> Three inverse models yield 26–56% higher total CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from north-western and eastern Europe compared to bottom-up emissions reported to the UNFCCC, while one model is close to the UNFCCC values. In contrast, the inverse modelling estimates of European N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are in general close to the UNFCCC values, with the overall range from all models being much smaller than the UNFCCC uncertainty range for most countries. Our analysis suggests that the reported uncertainties for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions might be underestimated, while those for N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are likely overestimated.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
          Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.
          Copernicus GmbH
          1680-7375
          2014
          June 16 2014
          : 14
          : 11
          : 15683-15734
          Article
          10.5194/acpd-14-15683-2014
          97fa78a8-991f-47f4-8502-1b40932dda52
          © 2014

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article