4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Clinical Trial with Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Attentional Bias Modification in Alcohol‐Dependent Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Modifying attentional processes with attentional bias modification (ABM) might be a relevant add‐on to treatment in addiction. This study investigated whether influencing cortical plasticity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could increase training effects. tDCS could also help alcohol‐dependent patients to overcome craving and reduce relapse, independent of training. These approaches were combined to investigate effects in the treatment of alcoholism.

          Methods

          Ninety‐eight patients (analytical sample = 83) were randomly assigned to 4 groups in a 2‐by‐2 factorial design. Patients received 4 sessions of ABM (control or real training) combined with 2 mA tDCS (active: 20 minutes or sham: 30 seconds) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Alcohol bias and craving were assessed, and treatment outcome was measured as relapse after 1 year.

          Results

          Attentional bias scores indicated that during the training only the group with active tDCS and real ABM displayed an overall avoidance bias ( p < 0.05). From pre‐ to postassessment, there were no main or interaction effects of tDCS and ABM on the bias scores, craving, or relapse ( p > 0.2). However, effects on relapse after active tDCS were in the expected direction.

          Conclusions

          There was no evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS or ABM or the combination. Whether the absence of effect was due to issues with the outcome measurements (e.g., lack of craving, high dropout, and unreliable measurements) or aspects of the intervention should be further investigated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

          In this paper we demonstrate in the intact human the possibility of a non-invasive modulation of motor cortex excitability by the application of weak direct current through the scalp. Excitability changes of up to 40 %, revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation, were accomplished and lasted for several minutes after the end of current stimulation. Excitation could be achieved selectively by anodal stimulation, and inhibition by cathodal stimulation. By varying the current intensity and duration, the strength and duration of the after-effects could be controlled. The effects were probably induced by modification of membrane polarisation. Functional alterations related to post-tetanic potentiation, short-term potentiation and processes similar to postexcitatory central inhibition are the likely candidates for the excitability changes after the end of stimulation. Transcranial electrical stimulation using weak current may thus be a promising tool to modulate cerebral excitability in a non-invasive, painless, reversible, selective and focal way.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

            This paper presents a biopsychological theory of drug addiction, the 'Incentive-Sensitization Theory'. The theory addresses three fundamental questions. The first is: why do addicts crave drugs? That is, what is the psychological and neurobiological basis of drug craving? The second is: why does drug craving persist even after long periods of abstinence? The third is whether 'wanting' drugs (drug craving) is attributable to 'liking' drugs (to the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs)? The theory posits the following. (1) Addictive drugs share the ability to enhance mesotelencephalic dopamine neurotransmission. (2) One psychological function of this neural system is to attribute 'incentive salience' to the perception and mental representation of events associated with activation of the system. Incentive salience is a psychological process that transforms the perception of stimuli, imbuing them with salience, making them attractive, 'wanted', incentive stimuli. (3) In some individuals the repeated use of addictive drugs produces incremental neuroadaptations in this neural system, rendering it increasingly and perhaps permanently, hypersensitive ('sensitized') to drugs and drug-associated stimuli. The sensitization of dopamine systems is gated by associative learning, which causes excessive incentive salience to be attributed to the act of drug taking and to stimuli associated with drug taking. It is specifically the sensitization of incentive salience, therefore, that transforms ordinary 'wanting' into excessive drug craving. (4) It is further proposed that sensitization of the neural systems responsible for incentive salience ('for wanting') can occur independently of changes in neural systems that mediate the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs (drug 'liking') and of neural systems that mediate withdrawal. Thus, sensitization of incentive salience can produce addictive behavior (compulsive drug seeking and drug taking) even if the expectation of drug pleasure or the aversive properties of withdrawal are diminished and even in the face of strong disincentives, including the loss of reputation, job, home and family. We review evidence for this view of addiction and discuss its implications for understanding the psychology and neurobiology of addiction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation.

              Since the rediscovery of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) about 10 years ago, interest in tDCS has grown exponentially. A noninvasive stimulation technique that induces robust excitability changes within the stimulated cortex, tDCS is increasingly being used in proof-of-principle and stage IIa clinical trials in a wide range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Alongside these clinical studies, detailed work has been performed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed effects. In this review, the authors bring together the results from these pharmacological, neurophysiological, and imaging studies to describe their current knowledge of the physiological effects of tDCS. In addition, the theoretical framework for how tDCS affects motor learning is proposed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                T.E.denUyl@outlook.com
                Journal
                Alcohol Clin Exp Res
                Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res
                10.1111/(ISSN)1530-0277
                ACER
                Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0145-6008
                1530-0277
                03 August 2018
                October 2018
                : 42
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1111/acer.2018.42.issue-10 )
                : 1961-1969
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Addiction, Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT) Lab Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Amsterdam Brain & Cognition (ABC) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] College Lane University of Chichester Chichester West Sussex UK
                [ 4 ] Salus Klinik Lindow Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Reprint requests: Tess E. den Uyl, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129‐B, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31205256830; E‐mail: T.E.denUyl@ 123456outlook.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-3418
                Article
                ACER13841
                10.1111/acer.13841
                6175348
                30025152
                9802271d-e02b-4ced-874a-a61a1d986898
                © 2018 The Authors Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Research Society on Alcoholism

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 20 February 2018
                : 12 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 9, Words: 8474
                Funding
                Funded by: N.W.O. (Dutch Science Foundation) Research Talent Grant
                Award ID: 406‐11‐203
                Funded by: European Foundation for Alcohol Research (ERAB)
                Award ID: EA 1239
                Categories
                Original Article
                Behavior, Treatment and Prevention
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                acer13841
                October 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.0 mode:remove_FC converted:08.10.2018

                Health & Social care
                transcranial direct current stimulation,cognitive bias modification,addiction,alcohol

                Comments

                Comment on this article