Determining Static Hyperinflation in Patients with Severe Emphysema: Relation Between Lung Function Parameters and Patient-Related Outcomes

Abstract

Background

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction techniques are minor invasive treatment modalities for severely hyperinflated emphysema patients. The severity of static lung hyperinflation determines eligibility and success rate for these treatments. However, it is not exactly known what parameter should be used to optimally reflect hyperinflation. Commonly used parameters are residual volume (RV) and the RV/Total lung capacity (TLC) ratio. Other parameters reflecting hyperinflation are Inspiratory Capacity/TLC and forced vital capacity.

Objectives

To define which of these function parameters is the most optimal reflection of hyperinflationin in relation to patient-related outcomes.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, data from measurements during baseline visits of eight studies were pooled. Primary outcomes were RV/TLC ratio and RV as percentage of predicted (RV%pred), both measured by bodyplethysmography, compared to the patient-related outcome variables: 6-min walk distance (6MWD), the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC).

Results

Two hundred seventy-four COPD patients (mean age 59 years; 66% female), FEV ₁ 0.74 ± 0.28 L, RV 4.94 ± 1.06 L, 6MWD of 339 ± 95 m, were included in the analysis. Significant correlations (all p < 0.01) were found between RV%pred and 6MWD ( r =  − 0.358), SGRQ ( r = 0.184), and mMRC ( r = 0.228). Also, there was a significant correlation between RV/TLC ratio and 6MWD ( r =  − 0.563), SGRQ ( r = 0.289) and mMRC ( r = 0.354). Linear regression analyses showed that RV/TLC ratio was a better predictor of patient outcomes than RV%pred.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that both RV/TLC ratio and RV%pred are relevant indicators of hyperinflation in patients with severe emphysema in relation to patient-related outcomes. RV/TLC ratio is more strongly related to the patient-related outcomes than RV%pred.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00408-020-00368-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.