4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of a Computer-Based Version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. A computer-based version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ-2) was tested and compared with the print version. Psychometric characteristics of the print version were replicated with the computer-based version using a between-subject design in Study 1 ( n 1 = 240; n 2 = 254) and using a within-subject design in Study 2 ( N = 285). Confirmatory factor analyses replicated the three-dimensional structure of the VMIQ-2. Model fits, test–retest reliability, interfactor correlations, and correlations with other questionnaires did not differ significantly between the computer-based and print versions. Convergent validity was shown by significant correlations with the Movement Imagery Questionnaire 3. The computer-based version of the VMIQ-2 is considered a valid instrument to measure vividness of action imagery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A power primer.

            One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                pta
                Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2698-1866
                March 4, 2022
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department for Psychology and Medical Sciences, UMIT – Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
                Author notes
                Stephan F. Dahm, Institute of Psychology, Department for Psychology and Medical Sciences, UMIT – Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, 6060 Hall in Tyrol, Austria, stephan.dahm@ 123456umit.at
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6001-6640
                Article
                pta_a000022_-1_1
                10.1027/2698-1866/a000022
                980d5cc3-848d-4010-b821-f2fa29d8b81e
                Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

                Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)

                History
                : July 17, 2020
                : December 16, 2021
                : December 20, 2021
                Categories
                Original Article
                Sports & Health Psychology

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology
                paper–pencil,imagery ability,computer-based,assessment medium,questionnaire,vividness of action imagery

                Comments

                Comment on this article