53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reliability and validity of Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist among Chinese middle school students living in rural areas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To re-evaluate the reliability and validity of the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist (ASLEC), and to adapt to the further application to middle school students in rural China.

          Methods A stratified random cluster sampling method was applied to select 15 607 adolescents from grade 7th to grade 12th in 15 rural areas of 5 provinces (Anhui Province, Yunan Province, Guangdong Province, Hei Longjiang Province, Hubei Province), and they were recruited to complete our Questionnaires.

          Results The revised version (ASLEC-R) consisted of 5 dimensions (punishment, interpersonal relationship, academic pressure, loss and adaptation problem), 25 items after deleting items 5 and 17 through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, which could accounted for 55.22% of the total variance. The fit indices were RMSEA = 0.06, GFI =0.91 CFI =0.88, TLI =0.86, NFI =0.88, AGFI =0.88, H0ELTER 0.05 = 261. The Cronbach’ s α and Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient of the whole scale were 0.92 and 0.87, respectively, and the test-retest reliability was 0.84. ASLEC-R had better reliability than the unrevised version. The results of five-joint item analyses showed that each item improved in terms of indiscrimination, relevance, contribution, homogeneity and sensitivity. The correlation coefficients with BWAQ and EI subscale were 0.38 and −0.36 respectively.

          Conclusion ASLEC-R has good reliability and validity, and it is worth being applied to the Chinese rural areas.

          Abstract

          【摘要】 目的 重新评估青少年生活事件量表 (Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist, ASLEC) 的信效度并加以 修订, 以适合中国农村地区中学生群体应用。 方法 采用多阶段分层整群抽样法, 对中国 5 省 (安徽、云南、广东、黑龙江、 湖北) 15 个农村地区共 15 607 名中学生进行问卷调査。 结果 经探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析, 剔除条目 5, 17 后共 包括受惩罚、人际关系、学习压力、丧失、适应 5 个因素的修订版 (ASLEC-R), 可解释 55.22% 的总体方差变异。各拟合指 标分别为 RMSEA = 0.06, GFI =0.91, CFI = 0.88, TLI =0.86, NFI =0.88, AGFI = 0.88, HOELTER 0.05 = 261。ASLEC-R 的 Cronbach α 系数为 0.92, 分半信度为 0.87, 重测信度为 0.84。总量表及各分量表 Cronbach α 系数均较修订前有所上升。5种联 合项目分析结果显示, 各条目的鉴别力、关联性、贡献度、同质性和灵敏度良好。与攻击问卷和情绪管理量表的关联系数分 别为 0.38, −0.36 ( P 值均<0.01)。 结论 5 因素结构的ASLEC-R信效度良好, 适合在中国农村地区使用。

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CJSH
          Chinese Journal of School Health
          Chinese Journal of School Health (China )
          1000-9817
          01 September 2019
          01 February 2020
          : 40
          : 9
          : 1353-1355
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Wuhan Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Wuhan (430015), China
          Author notes
          *Corresponding author: YU Yizhen, E-mail: yuyizhen650@ 123456163.com
          Article
          j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.09.020
          10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.09.020
          981d7a1d-2fc4-4dbb-96e8-1a8da4697764
          © 2019 Chinese Journal of School Health

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

          History
          Categories
          Journal Article

          Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pediatrics,Nutrition & Dietetics,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
          Life change events,Questionnaires,Students,Rural population

          Comments

          Comment on this article