14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Continuity of care is an important and distinct aspect of childbirth experience: findings of a survey evaluating experienced continuity of care, experienced quality of care and women’s perception of labor

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To compare experienced continuity of care among women who received midwife-led versus obstetrician-led care. Secondly, to compare experienced continuity of care with a. experienced quality of care during labor and b. perception of labor.

          Methods

          We conducted a questionnaire survey in a region in the Netherlands in 2014 among 790 women after they gave birth. To measure experienced continuity of care, the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire was used. Quality of care during labor was measured with the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire, and to measure perception of labor we used the Childbirth Perception Scale.

          Results

          Three hundred twenty five women consented to participate (41%). Of these, 187 women completed the relevant questions in the online questionnaire. 136 (73%) women were in midwife-led care at the onset of labor, 15 (8%) were in obstetrician-led care throughout pregnancy and 36 (19%) were referred to obstetrician-led care during pregnancy. Experienced personal and team continuity of care during pregnancy were higher for women in midwife-led care compared to those in obstetrician-led care at the onset of labor. Experienced continuity of care was moderately correlated with experienced quality of care although not significantly so in all subgroups. A weak negative correlation was found between experienced personal continuity of care by the midwife and perception of labor.

          Conclusion

          This study suggests that experienced continuity of care depends on the care context and is significantly higher for women who are in midwife-led compared to obstetrician-led care during labor. It will be a challenge to maintain the high level of experienced continuity of care in an integrated maternity care system.

          Experienced continuity of care seems to be a distinctive concept that should not be confused with experienced quality of care or perception of labor and should be considered as a complementary aspect of quality of care.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1615-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review.

          To summarize what is known about satisfaction with childbirth, with particular attention to the roles of pain and pain relief. A systematic review of 137 reports of factors influencing women's evaluations of their childbirth experiences. The reports included descriptive studies, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions. Results were summarized qualitatively. Four factors-personal expectations, the amount of support from caregivers, the quality of the caregiver-patient relationship, and involvement in decision making-appear to be so important that they override the influences of age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, childbirth preparation, the physical birth environment, pain, immobility, medical interventions, and continuity of care, when women evaluate their childbirth experiences. The influences of pain, pain relief, and intrapartum medical interventions on subsequent satisfaction are neither as obvious, as direct, nor as powerful as the influences of the attitudes and behaviors of the caregivers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis.

            Research has demonstrated that women develop postpartum PTSD. Prevalence of postpartum PTSD has ranged from 1% to 30%, and many risk factors have been identified as predictors of postpartum PTSD. While qualitative reviews have identified patterns of risk, the lack of quantitative reviews prevents the field from identifying specific risk factors and making a single estimate of the prevalence of postpartum PTSD. The current meta-analysis investigated prevalence and risk factors of postpartum PTSD, both due to childbirth and other events, among community and targeted samples. Prevalence of postpartum PTSD in community samples was estimated to be 3.1% and in at-risk samples at 15.7%. Important risk factors in community samples included current depression, labor experiences such as interactions with medical staff, as well as a history of psychopathology. In at-risk samples, impactful risk factors included current depression and infant complications. Further research should investigate how attitudes towards pregnancy and childbirth may interact with women's experiences during delivery. Additionally, studies need to begin to evaluate possible long-term effects that these symptoms may have on women and their families. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review

              Background Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. Methods A review of the literature was conducted. Studies were located through computerised databases and hand searching references of identified articles and reviews. Inclusion criteria were that the questionnaire was a multi-item scale of satisfaction with care during labour and birth, and some form of psychometric information (either information about questionnaire construction, or reliability, or validity) had to be reported. Results Nine questionnaires of satisfaction with care during labour and birth were identified. Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions. Most described questionnaire construction and tested some form of reliability and validity. Measures were generally not based on the main theoretical models of satisfaction and varied in scope and application to different types of samples (e.g. satisfaction following caesarean section). For an in-depth measure of satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire (QPP-I) is recommended. Brief measures with good reliability and validity are provided by the Six Simple Questions (SSQ) or Perceptions of Care Adjective Checklist (PCACL-R). Conclusions Despite the interest in measures of satisfaction there are only a small number of validated measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. It is important that brief, reliable and valid measures are available for use in general and specific populations in order to assist research and inform practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                h.perdok@vumc.nl
                c.verhoeven@vumc.nl
                jeroen.vandillen1@radboudumc.nl
                t.j.schuitmaker@vu.nl
                kahoogendoorn@hotmail.com
                j.colli@verloskundigenleo.nl
                f.schellevis@nivel.nl
                j.dejonge1@vumc.nl
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                8 January 2018
                8 January 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, GRID grid.16872.3a, Department of Midwifery Science, , Midwifery Academy Amsterdam/Groningen (AVAG) and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and at Catharina Hospital, ; Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, GRID grid.16872.3a, Department of Midwifery Science, , AVAG and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and at Maxima Medical Center, ; Veldhoven, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, GRID grid.10417.33, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, , Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0435 165X, GRID grid.16872.3a, Faculty of Earth & Life Sciences, , Athena Institute, VU University Medical Center, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Gelre Verloskundig Centrum Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Midwifery practice Oestgeest, The Netherlands and Co-operation of Midwives Leiden area (Cooperatie LEO), Leiden, The Netherlands
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0686 3219, GRID grid.466632.3, Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, , EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, ; Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                1615
                10.1186/s12884-017-1615-y
                5759271
                29310627
                982312bf-1359-4a11-b252-502877d9a8cf
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 22 December 2016
                : 7 December 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                patient perspective,birth,labor,childbirth experience,continuity of care,quality of care,perception of care

                Comments

                Comment on this article