45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Contributions of the glycocalyx, endothelium, and extravascular compartment to the blood–brain barrier

      , ,
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p id="d5568264e209">The vascular endothelium constitutes the main barrier that restricts the transport of molecules from blood to brain. However, the barrier properties of structures adjacent to the vascular endothelium are understudied. Based on two-photon microscopy imaging of single cortical capillaries, we found that the blood–brain barrier (BBB) consisted of at least three elements: the endothelial glycocalyx, which forms a barrier on the blood side to large but not small molecules; the endothelium; and the basement membrane and astrocyte endfeet—the final line of defense on the brain side. All three elements restricted permeation of large molecules and should be taken into account when studying drug delivery and disease states. </p><p class="first" id="d5568264e212">The endothelial cells that form the blood–brain barrier (BBB) are coated with glycocalyx, on the luminal side, and with the basement membrane and astrocyte endfeet, on the abluminal side. However, it is unclear how exactly the glycocalyx and extravascular structures contribute to BBB properties. We used two-photon microscopy in anesthetized mice to record passive transport of four different-sized molecules—sodium fluorescein (376 Da), Alexa Fluor (643 Da), 40-kDa dextran, and 150-kDa dextran—from blood to brain, at the level of single cortical capillaries. Both fluorescein and Alexa penetrated nearly the entire glycocalyx volume, but the dextrans penetrated less than 60% of the volume. This suggested that the glycocalyx was a barrier for large but not small molecules. The estimated permeability of the endothelium was the same for fluorescein and Alexa but several-fold lower for the larger dextrans. In the extravascular compartment, co-localized with astrocyte endfeet, diffusion coefficients of the dyes were an order of magnitude lower than in the brain parenchyma. This suggested that the astrocyte endfeet and basement membrane also contributed to BBB properties. In conclusion, the passive transport of small and large hydrophilic molecules through the BBB was determined by three separate barriers: the glycocalyx, the endothelium, and the extravascular compartment. All three barriers must be taken into account in drug delivery studies and when considering BBB dysfunction in disease states. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fluorescence intermittency in single cadmium selenide nanocrystals

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy

            We optimally localize isolated fluorescent beads and molecules imaged as diffraction-limited spots, determine the orientation of molecules, and present reliable formulae for the precisions of various localization methods. For beads, theory and experimental data both show that unweighted least-squares fitting of a Gaussian squanders one third of the available information, a popular formula for its precision exaggerates beyond Fisher's information limit, and weighted least-squares may do worse, while maximum likelihood fitting is practically optimal.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characterization of a microfluidic in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (μBBB).

              The blood-brain barrier (BBB), a unique selective barrier for the central nervous system (CNS), hinders the passage of most compounds to the CNS, complicating drug development. Innovative in vitro models of the BBB can provide useful insights into its role in CNS disease progression and drug delivery. Static transwell models lack fluidic shear stress, while the conventional dynamic in vitro BBB lacks a thin dual cell layer interface. To address both limitations, we developed a microfluidic blood-brain barrier (μBBB) which closely mimics the in vivo BBB with a dynamic environment and a comparatively thin culture membrane (10 μm). To test validity of the fabricated BBB model, μBBBs were cultured with b.End3 endothelial cells, both with and without co-cultured C8-D1A astrocytes, and their key properties were tested with optical imaging, trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER), and permeability assays. The resultant imaging of ZO-1 revealed clearly expressed tight junctions in b.End3 cells, Live/Dead assays indicated high cell viability, and astrocytic morphology of C8-D1A cells were confirmed by ESEM and GFAP immunostains. By day 3 of endothelial culture, TEER levels typically exceeded 250 Ω cm(2) in μBBB co-cultures, and 25 Ω cm(2) for transwell co-cultures. Instantaneous transient drop in TEER in response to histamine exposure was observed in real-time, followed by recovery, implying stability of the fabricated μBBB model. Resultant permeability coefficients were comparable to previous BBB models, and were significantly increased at higher pH (>10). These results demonstrate that the developed μBBB system is a valid model for some studies of BBB function and drug delivery.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                October 02 2018
                October 02 2018
                October 02 2018
                September 14 2018
                : 115
                : 40
                : E9429-E9438
                Article
                10.1073/pnas.1802155115
                6176561
                30217895
                983a1540-dd2d-40b2-b905-76daffe15f36
                © 2018

                Free to read

                http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/userlicense.xhtml

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log