57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to this journal, click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Specialty preferences among medical students in a Kenyan university

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Specialty distribution in Kenya continues to exhibit gender disparities despite the increasing number of female medical students graduating each year. This study aimed at assessing specialty preferences and factors influencing these choices among male and female medical students in Kenya.

          Methods

          Four hundred and fifty medical students, from first to fifth year of study at the University of Nairobi, were each issued a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess their specialty preferences and factors influencing these choices. The specialty preferences were compared with the actual distribution of specialists in Kenya. Data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences.

          Results

          Three hundred and eighty five (85.6%) questionnaires were completed. Surgery had the highest preference rate followed by pediatrics, internal medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. Significantly more males preferred surgery than females who mainly selected pediatrics (p<0.001). There was an increased likelihood of female students choosing controllable lifestyle specialties. These preferences mirrored the actual distribution of specialists in Kenya. Male students significantly considered prestige in a specialty (p=0.006), while their female counterparts mostly considered ease of raising a family and gender distribution in the specialty (p<0.001).

          Conclusion

          Gender-based similarities and differences exist in factors influencing specialty preferences among Kenyan medical students. These factors may explain the observed specialist doctor distribution in the country.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The influence of controllable lifestyle and sex on the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students, 1996-2003.

          To determine whether the preferences of female medical students are sufficient to explain the recent trend of U.S. medical students choosing specialties with controllable lifestyles. Specialty choice for graduating U.S. medical students by sex was determined from the responses to the Association of American Medical Colleges' 1996-2003 Medical School Graduation Questionnaires. Using earlier research, specialties were classified as having an uncontrollable or controllable lifestyle. Log-linear models were constructed to assess the strength of association among trends in specialty choice, controllable lifestyle, and sex. The percentage of women choosing specialties with controllable lifestyles increased from 18% in 1996 to 36% in 2003. For men, the percentage grew from 28% to 45%. The change in preference for controllable lifestyle specialties accounted for a large proportion of the variability in specialty choices for both women and men from 1996-2003 (chi2 for changes common to women and men = 920, 1 df, p < .0001). The difference between women and men in the trend toward controllable lifestyle specialties was small relative to the common changes (chi2 for differences = 12, 1 df, p = .0005). Controllable lifestyle was strongly associated with the recent trends in specialty choice for both women and men and could not be explained solely by the specialty preferences of women.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The relationship between specialty choice and gender of U.S. medical students, 1990-2003.

            Women have been postulated to be more responsible than men for the recent trend of lifestyle factors influencing the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students. The authors looked at the specialty choices of U.S. medical students between 1990 and 2003 to determine whether and to what degree women were responsible for the trends toward controllable lifestyle specialties. Specialty preference was based on analysis of results from the American Association of Medical Colleges' Medical School Graduation Questionnaire. Specialty lifestyle (controllable vs. uncontrollable) was classified using a standard definition from prior research. A random effects regression model was used to assess differences between men and women in specialty choice over time and the proportion of variability in specialty preference from 1990 to 2003 explained by women. Overall, a greater proportion of women planned to pursue uncontrollable specialties compared with men in every year analyzed. Both women and men demonstrated a decreasing interest in uncontrollable lifestyle specialties by almost 20%. However, regression analysis found that women were more slightly more likely to choose an uncontrollable lifestyle specialty compared to men over time (p < .01). Among U.S. medical graduates, women were not more responsible than were men for the trend away from uncontrollable lifestyle specialties over the time period studied. Men and women expressed similar and significant rates of declining interest in specialties with uncontrollable lifestyles.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A "ton of feathers": gender discrimination in academic medical careers and how to manage it.

              To evaluate the experience of gender discrimination among a limited sample of women in academic medicine, specifically, the role of discrimination in hindering careers, coping mechanisms, and perceptions of what institutions and leaders of academic medicine can do to improve the professional workplace climate for women. In-depth, semistructured telephonic individual interviews of 18 women faculty who experienced or may have experienced discrimination in the course of their professional academic medical careers from 13 of the 24 institutions of the National Faculty Survey. A consensus taxonomy for classifying content evolved from comparisons of coding. Themes expressed by multiple faculty were studied for patterns of connection and grouped into broader categories. Forty percent of respondents ranked gender discrimination first out of 11 possible choices for hindering their career in academic medicine. Thirty-five percent ranked gender discrimination second to either "limited time for professional work" or "lack of mentoring." Respondents rated themselves as poorly prepared to deal with gender discrimination and noted effects on professional self-confidence, self-esteem, collegiality, isolation, and career satisfaction. The hierarchical structure in academe is perceived to work against women, as there are few women at the top. Women faculty who have experienced gender discrimination perceive that little can be done to directly address this issue. Institutions need to be proactive and recurrently evaluate the gender climate, as well as provide transparent information and fair scrutiny of promotion and salary decisions. According to this subset of women who perceive that they have been discriminated against based on gender, sexual bias and discrimination are subtly pervasive and powerful. Such environments may have consequences for both women faculty and academic medicine, affecting morale and dissuading younger trainees from entering academic careers. Medical schools need to evaluate and may need to improve the environment for women in academe.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pan Afr Med J
                pamj
                The Pan African Medical Journal
                African Field Epidemiology Network
                1937-8688
                1937-8688
                2010
                08 June 2010
                : 5
                : 18
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenya
                Author notes
                [& ]Corresponding author: Philip Maseghe Mwachaka, Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197 - 00100 GPO, Mobile: 254723353913, Nairobi, Kenya
                Article
                3032620
                21293745
                9878176e-83ff-482e-acc9-e3264f2ace62
                Copyright © PM Mwachaka et al.

                The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 April 2010
                : 24 May 2010
                Categories
                Life Sciences
                Medicine

                Medicine
                specialty,gender,career,medical study,kenya
                Medicine
                specialty, gender, career, medical study, kenya

                Comments

                Comment on this article