4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Agreement between nonculprit stenosis follow-up iFR and FFR after STEMI (iSTEMI substudy)

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate agreement between instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) for the functional assessment of nonculprit coronary stenoses at staged follow-up after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

          Results

          We measured iFR and FFR at staged follow-up in 112 STEMI patients with 146 nonculprit stenoses. Median interval between STEMI and follow-up was 16 (interquartile range 5–32) days. Agreement between iFR and FFR was 77% < 5 days after STEMI and 86% after ≥ 5 days (p = 0.19). Among cases with disagreement, the proportion of cases with hemodynamically significant iFR and non-significant FFR were different when assessed < 5 days (5 in 8, 63%) versus ≥ 5 days (3 in 15, 20%) after STEMI (p = 0.04). Overall classification agreement between iFR and FFR was comparable to that observed in stable patients. Time interval between STEMI and follow-up evaluation may impact agreement between iFR and FFR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

          Coronary revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with better patient outcomes after the procedure than revascularization guided by angiography alone. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry.

            To evaluate the classification agreement between instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with angiographic intermediate coronary stenoses. Three hundred and twelve patients (339 stenoses) with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this international clinical registry. The iFR was calculated using fully automated algorithms. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the iFR optimal cut-point corresponding to FFR 0.8. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses as significant or non-significant was established between iFR and FFR and between repeated FFR measurements for each 0.05 quantile of FFR values, from 0.2 to 1. Close agreement was observed between iFR and FFR (area under ROC curve= 86%). The optimal iFR cut-off (for an FFR of 0.80) was 0.89. After adjustment for the intrinsic variability of FFR, the classification agreement (accuracy) between iFR and FFR was 94%. Amongst the stenoses classified as non-significant by iFR (>0.89) and as significant by FFR (≤0.8), 81% had associated FFR values located within the FFR "grey-zone" (0.75-0.8) and 41% within the 0.79-0.80 FFR range. In a population of intermediate coronary stenoses, the classification agreement between iFR and FFR is excellent and similar to that of repeated FFR measurements in the same sample. Vasodilator-independent assessment of intermediate stenosis seems applicable and may foster adoption of coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Temporal Changes in Coronary Hyperemic and Resting Hemodynamic Indices in Nonculprit Vessels of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

              This cohort study assesses changes in nonhyperemic and hyperemic hemodynamic stenosis and resistance indices in nonculprit vessels in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Are nonculprit physiology indices to assess stenosis severity associated with altered intracoronary hemodynamics in the acute setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)? Among 73 patients with STEMI with multivessel disease, nonculprit fractional flow reserve was increased and coronary flow reserve was decreased in the acute setting. Instantaneous wave-free ratio numerically increased but remained stable from the acute moment of presentation to 1-month follow-up; these changes were accompanied by an increased hyperemic and decreased baseline microcirculatory resistance in the acute setting of STEMI. The findings suggest that intracoronary hemodynamics among patients with STEMI are altered in the acute setting and are associated with the value of nonculprit intracoronary physiologic indices necessary to guide revascularization of intermediate stenoses. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of nonculprit vessels among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with improved clinical outcome compared with culprit vessel–only PCI. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve are hyperemic indices used to guide revascularization. Recently, instantaneous wave-free ratio was introduced as a nonhyperemic alternative to FFR. Whether these indices can be used in the acute setting of STEMI continues to be investigated. To assess the value of hemodynamic indices in nonculprit vessels of patients with STEMI from the index event to 1-month follow-up. This substudy of the Reducing Micro Vascular Dysfunction in Revascularized STEMI Patients by Off-target Properties of Ticagrelor (REDUCE-MVI) randomized clinical trial enrolled 98 patients with STEMI who had an angiographic intermediate stenosis in at least 1 nonculprit vessel. Patient enrollment was between May 1, 2015, and September 19, 2017. After successful primary PCI, nonculprit intracoronary hemodynamic measurements were performed and repeated at 1-month follow-up. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed from 2 to 7 days and 1 month after primary PCI. The value of nonculprit instantaneous wave-free ratio, FFR, coronary flow reserve, hyperemic index of microcirculatory resistance, and resting microcirculatory resistance from the index event to 1-month follow-up. Of 73 patients with STEMI included in the final analysis, 59 (80.8%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 60.8 (9.9) years. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (SD) did not change significantly (0.93 [0.07] vs 0.94 [0.06]; P  = .12) and there was no change in resting distal pressure/aortic pressure (mean [SD], 0.94 [0.06] vs 0.95 [0.06]; P  = .25) from the acute moment to 1-month follow-up. The FFR decreased (mean [SD], 0.88 [0.07] vs 0.86 [0.09]; P  = .001) whereas coronary flow reserve increased (mean [SD], 2.9 [1.4] vs 4.1 [2.2]; P  < .001). Hyperemic index of microcirculatory resistance decreased and resting microcirculatory resistance increased from the acute moment to follow-up. The decrease in distal pressure from rest to hyperemia was smaller at the acute moment vs follow-up (mean [SD], 10.6 [11.2] mm Hg vs 14.1 [14.2] mm Hg; P  = .05). This blunted acute hyperemic response correlated with final infarct size (ρ, –0.29; P  = .02). The resistive reserve ratio was lower at the acute moment vs follow-up (mean [SD], 3.4 [1.7] vs 5.0 [2.7]; P  < .001). In the acute setting of STEMI, nonculprit coronary flow reserve was reduced and FFR was augmented, whereas instantaneous wave-free ratio was not altered. These results may be explained by an increased hyperemic microvascular resistance and a blunted adenosine responsiveness at the acute moment that was associated with infarct size.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                troels.thim@clin.au.dk
                Journal
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Res Notes
                BMC Research Notes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-0500
                1 September 2020
                1 September 2020
                2020
                : 13
                : 410
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.154185.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 597X, Department of Cardiology, , Aarhus University Hospital, ; Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
                [2 ]GRID grid.411843.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0623 9987, Department of Cardiology, , Skåne University Hospital, ; Malmö, Sweden
                [3 ]GRID grid.15895.30, ISNI 0000 0001 0738 8966, Department of Cardiology, , Örebro University, ; Örebro, Sweden
                [4 ]GRID grid.10417.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0444 9382, Department of Cardiology, , Radboud University Medical Center, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.414690.e, ISNI 0000 0004 1764 6852, Cardiology Department, , Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, ; Amadora, Portugal
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-5559
                Article
                5252
                10.1186/s13104-020-05252-6
                7466494
                32873327
                98a9b159-d003-4204-a3ba-df4f68b13af6
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 25 June 2020
                : 21 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Volcano
                Funded by: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
                Award ID: 90714544
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Note
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                st-segment elevation myocardial infarction,nonculprit stenosis,fractional flow reserve,ffr,instantaneous wave-free ration,ifr

                Comments

                Comment on this article