9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Disproportionate bill length dimorphism and niche differentiation in wintering western sandpipers (Calidris mauri)

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Canadian Journal of Zoology
      Canadian Science Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Western sandpipers ( Calidris mauri (Cabanis, 1857)) exhibit slight female-biased sexual size dimorphism (5%) but disproportionate bill length dimorphism (15.9%). We test two predictions of the niche differentiation hypothesis at two wintering sites in Mexico with uniform western sandpiper densities, and use sex ratio as an index of intersexual competition. First, to test whether bill length dimorphism is larger at sites where sex ratios are strongly male-biased, we develop a migrant-based null model to represent dimorphism (12%, based on the average of males and females) in the absence of competition. Relative to the null model, bill length dimorphism was significantly larger at the large site (Santa María: 13.4%) but not at the small site (Punta Banda: 12.7%). Second, we tested whether bill length dimorphism increases as sex ratio approaches 1:1. Although the sex-ratio difference between sites was only 5%, bill length dimorphism increased marginally in the predicted direction. Additional comparisons suggest a cline in bill length dimorphism that mirrors a latitudinal gradient in prey burial depth. While sexual size dimorphism in the western sandpiper likely derived from selection for different body size optima, intersexual competition for food on the wintering grounds appears to have promoted further divergence in bill length.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Sexual Dimorphism, Sexual Selection, and Adaptation in Polygenic Characters

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection.

            Charadrii (shorebirds, gulls, and alcids) have an unusual diversity in their sexual size dimorphism, ranging from monomorphism to either male-biased or female-biased dimorphism. We use comparative analyses to investigate whether this variation relates to sexual selection through competition for mates or natural selection through different use of resources by males and females. As predicted by sexual selection theory, we found that in taxa with socially polygynous mating systems, males were relatively larger than females compared with less polygynous species. Furthermore, evolution toward socially polyandrous mating systems was correlated with decreases in relative male size. These patterns depend on the kinds of courtship displays performed by males. In taxa with acrobatic flight displays, males are relatively smaller than in taxa in which courtship involves simple flights or displays from the ground. This result remains significant when the relationship with mating system is controlled statistically, thereby explaining the enigma of why males are often smaller than females in socially monogamous species. We did not find evidence that evolutionary changes in sexual dimorphism relate to niche division on the breeding grounds. In particular, biparental species did not have greater dimorphism in bill lengths than uniparental species, contrary to the hypothesis that selection for ecological divergence on the breeding grounds has been important as a general explanation for patterns of bill dimorphism. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that sexual selection has had a major influence on sexual size dimorphism in Charadrii, whereas divergence in the use of feeding resources while breeding was not supported by our analyses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds.

              Sexual size dimorphism shows a remarkably widespread relationship to body size in the animal kingdom: within lineages, it decreases with size when females are the larger sex, but it increases with size when males are the larger sex. Here we demonstrate that this pattern, termed Rensch's rule, exists in shorebirds and allies (Charadriides), and it is determined by two components of sexual selection: the intensity of sexual selection acting on males and the agility of the males' display. These effects are interactive so that the effect of sexual selection on size dimorphism depends on male agility. As a control, we also examine dimorphism in bill length, which is a functionally selected trait. As such, dimorphism in bill length neither exhibits Rensch's rule nor is associated with sexual selection and display. Our results show that variation among taxa in the direction and magnitude of sexual size dimorphism, as manifested as Rensch's rule, can be explained by the interaction between the form and strength of sexual selection acting on each sex in relation to body size.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Canadian Journal of Zoology
                Can. J. Zool.
                Canadian Science Publishing
                0008-4301
                1480-3283
                July 2008
                July 2008
                : 86
                : 7
                : 601-609
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
                [2 ]Departamento de Biología de la Conservación, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Km 107, Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, C.P. 22830, Baja California, México.
                [3 ]Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 811, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, C.P. 82040, México.
                [4 ]Pacific Wildlife Research Centre, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Delta, BC V4K 3N2, Canada.
                Article
                10.1139/Z08-033
                98ad3fbc-ca0a-4ffb-b80a-c97276962113
                © 2008

                http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining

                History

                Biochemistry,Animal science & Zoology
                Biochemistry, Animal science & Zoology

                Comments

                Comment on this article