130
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reference Dosimetry according to the New German Protocol DIN 6800-2 and Comparison with IAEA TRS 398 and AAPM TG 51 *

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The preceding DIN 6800-2 (1997) protocol has been revised by a German task group and its latest version was published in March 2008 as the national standard dosimetry protocol DIN 6800-2 (2008 March). Since then, in Germany the determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams has to be performed according to this new German dosimetry protocol. The IAEA Code of Practice TRS 398 (2000) and the AAPM TG-51 are the two main protocols applied internationally. The new German version has widely adapted the methodology and dosimetric data of TRS-398. This paper investigates systematically the DIN 6800-2 protocol and compares it with the procedures and results obtained by using the international protocols. The investigation was performed with 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams as well as with electron beams from 5 MeV to 21 MeV. While only cylindrical chambers were used for photon beams, the measurements of electron beams were performed by using cylindrical and plane-parallel chambers. It was found that the discrepancies in the determination of absorbed dose to water among the three protocols were 0.23% for photon beams and 1.2% for electron beams. The determination of water absorbed dose was also checked by a national audit procedure using TLDs. The comparison between the measurements following the DIN 6800-2 protocol and the TLD audit-procedure confirmed a difference of less than 2%. The advantage of the new German protocol DIN 6800-2 lies in the renouncement on the cross calibration procedure as well as its clear presentation of formulas and parameters. In the past, the different protocols evoluted differently from time to time. Fortunately today, a good convergence has been obtained in concepts and methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].

          The determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams is performed in Germany according to the dosimetry protocol DIN 6800-2 (1997). At an international level, the main protocols used are the AAPM dosimetry protocol TG-51 (1999) and the IAEA Code of Practice TRS-398 (2000). The present paper systematically compares these three dosimetry protocols, and identifies similarities and differences. The investigations were performed using 4 and 10 MV photon beams, as well as 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 14 MeV electron beams. Two cylindrical and two plane-parallel type chambers were used for measurements. In general, the discrepancies among the three protocols were 1.0% for photon beams and 1.6% for electron beams. Comparative measurements in the context of measurement technical control (MTK) with TLD showed a deviation of less than 1.3% between the measurements obtained according to protocols DIN 6800-2 and MTK (exceptions: 4 MV photons with 2.9% and 6 MeV electrons with 2.4%). While only cylindrical chambers were used for photon beams, measurements of electron beams were performed using both cylindrical and plane-parallel chambers (the latter used after a cross-calibration to a cylindrical chamber, as required by the respective dosimetry protocols). Notably, unlike recommended in the corresponding protocols, we found out that cylindrical chambers can be used also for energies from 6 to 10 MeV.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Absorbed dose determination for high energy photon and electron beams at a PRIMUS linear accelerator using the documents DIN 6800-2 and TRS-398.

            The International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna has recently published a new Code of Practice for absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy (Technical Reports Series No. 398). This code claims to fulfill the need for a systematic and internationally unfied approach to the calibration of ionization chambers, as well as to the use of these detectors in determining the absorbed dose to water for the radiation beams used in radiotherapy. In Germany, the corresponding national norms are laid down in DIN 6800-2. Therefore, it appeared necessary to compare in detail the procedures and results obtained according to these two documents. The comparison was performed for a 6 MV and 15 MV photon beam, as well as for a 12 MeV and 18 MeV electron beam. Although a series of differences could be ascertained, in particular in the numerical values of the various perturbation factors, the agreement of the final results remained well within the expected uncertainty range. Nevertheless, it is suggested to modify DIN 6800-2 in order to make it more easily applicable to a hospital environment, to incorporate the progress of knowledge in the data involved, and to achieve a better adherence to international recommendations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams-comparison of the standards DIN 6800-2 (1997), IAEA TRS 398 (2000) and DIN 6800-2 (2006)

              For the determination of the absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams the IAEA code of practice TRS-398 (2000) is applied internationally. In Germany, the German dosimetry protocol DIN 6800-2 (1997) is used. Recently, the DIN standard has been revised and published as Draft National Standard DIN 6800-2 (2006). It has adopted widely the methodology and dosimetric data of the code of practice. This paper compares these three dosimetry protocols systematically and identifies similarities as well as differences. The investigation was done with 6 and 18 MV photon as well as 5 to 21 MeV electron beams. While only cylindrical chambers were used for photon beams, measurements of electron beams were performed using cylindrical as well as plane-parallel chambers. The discrepancies in the determination of absorbed dose to water between the three protocols were 0.4% for photon beams and 1.5% for electron beams. Comparative measurements showed a deviation of less than 0.5% between our measurements following protocol DIN 6800-2 (2006) and TLD inter-comparison procedure in an external audit.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomed Imaging Interv J
                biij
                Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal
                Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
                1823-5530
                01 April 2011
                Apr-Jun 2011
                : 7
                : 2
                : e15
                Affiliations
                Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Kreiskrankenhaus Gummersbach, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Cologne, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author. Address: Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Kreiskrankenhaus Gummersbach, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Cologne, Wilhelm-Breckow-Allee 20, D- 51643 Gummersbach, Germany. Tel.: 02261171859; Fax: 02261171862; E-mail: zakaria@ 123456kkh-gummersbach.de (Golam Abu Zakaria).
                Article
                10.2349/biij.7.2.e15
                3265153
                22287987
                98c9beca-0cf6-4ce7-b2b7-e87c6887e86c
                © 2011 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 March 2010
                : 23 February 2011
                : 24 February 2011
                Categories
                Original Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                aapm tg-51 (1999),absorbed dose to water,iaea trs 398 (2000),din 6800-2 (2008 march)

                Comments

                Comment on this article