42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cognitive representation of “musical fractals”: Processing hierarchy and recursion in the auditory domain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The human ability to process hierarchical structures has been a longstanding research topic. However, the nature of the cognitive machinery underlying this faculty remains controversial. Recursion, the ability to embed structures within structures of the same kind, has been proposed as a key component of our ability to parse and generate complex hierarchies. Here, we investigated the cognitive representation of both recursive and iterative processes in the auditory domain. The experiment used a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm: participants were exposed to three-step processes in which pure-tone sequences were built either through recursive or iterative processes, and had to choose the correct completion. Foils were constructed according to generative processes that did not match the previous steps. Both musicians and non-musicians were able to represent recursion in the auditory domain, although musicians performed better. We also observed that general ‘musical’ aptitudes played a role in both recursion and iteration, although the influence of musical training was somehow independent from melodic memory. Moreover, unlike iteration, recursion in audition was well correlated with its non-auditory (recursive) analogues in the visual and action sequencing domains. These results suggest that the cognitive machinery involved in establishing recursive representations is domain-general, even though this machinery requires access to information resulting from domain-specific processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Specific impairments of planning.

          T Shallice (1982)
          An information-processing model is outlined that predicts that performance on non-routine tasks can be impaired independently of performance on routine tasks. The model is related to views on frontal lobe functions, particularly those of Luria. Two methods of obtaining more rigorous tests of the model are discussed. One makes use of ideas from artificial intelligence to derive a task heavily loaded on planning abilities. A group of patients with left anterior lesions has a specific deficit on the task. Subsidiary investigations support the inference that this is a planning impairment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Acquisition of cognitive skill.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new neural framework for visuospatial processing.

              The division of cortical visual processing into distinct dorsal and ventral streams is a key framework that has guided visual neuroscience. The characterization of the ventral stream as a 'What' pathway is relatively uncontroversial, but the nature of dorsal stream processing is less clear. Originally proposed as mediating spatial perception ('Where'), more recent accounts suggest it primarily serves non-conscious visually guided action ('How'). Here, we identify three pathways emerging from the dorsal stream that consist of projections to the prefrontal and premotor cortices, and a major projection to the medial temporal lobe that courses both directly and indirectly through the posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortices. These three pathways support both conscious and non-conscious visuospatial processing, including spatial working memory, visually guided action and navigation, respectively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cognition
                Cognition
                Cognition
                Elsevier
                0010-0277
                1873-7838
                1 April 2017
                April 2017
                : 161
                : 31-45
                Affiliations
                [a ]Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
                [b ]Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
                [c ]Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [d ]Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Austria
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University, Luisenstrasse 56, 10117 Berlin, Germany.Berlin School of Mind and BrainHumboldt UniversityLuisenstrasse 5610117 BerlinGermany diasmarm@ 123456hu-berlin.de
                Article
                S0010-0277(17)30001-X
                10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.001
                5348576
                28103526
                991490d9-202b-4aa6-8829-e09d301867e4
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 November 2015
                : 1 October 2016
                : 3 January 2017
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Neurosciences
                hierarchy,recursion,fractals,music,auditory
                Neurosciences
                hierarchy, recursion, fractals, music, auditory

                Comments

                Comment on this article