8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Task-Contingent Persistence is Related to Better Performance-Based Measures in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Pacing, avoidance, and overdoing are considered the three main behavioral strategies, also labeled activity patterns. Their relationship with functioning of patients with chronic pain is debated. The purpose of this study was to measure the influence of activity patterns on lifting tasks commonly used in daily life.

          Method

          We performed a monocentric observational study and included patients performing Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE). Avoidance, pacing, and persistence were assessed with using the Patterns of Activity Measures–Pain (POAM-P). Maximal safe performance was measured for floor-to-waist, waist-to-overhead, horizontal lift, and carrying with dominant-hand tests according to the FCE guidelines. Descriptive statistics, associations of POAM-P subscales with various sociodemographic variables, and correlations are presented. Standard multiple linear regression models were applied to measure the associations between FCE tests and POAM-P subscales, adjusting for the following potential confounders: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pain severity, trauma severity, localization of injury, and education.

          Results

          Persistence was significantly positively associated with performance on the 4 FCE tests: floor-to-waist (coefficient = 0.20; p=0.001), waist-to-overhead (coefficient = 0.13; p=0.004), horizontal lift (coefficient = 0.31; p ≤ 0.001), and dominant-handed lifting (coefficient = 0.19; p=0.001). Pacing was found to have a negative influence on the carrying dominant-hand test (coefficient = –0.14; p=0.034), and avoidance was not found to have an influence on the 4 FCE tests.

          Conclusion

          This study shows that task-persistence pattern is positively associated with physical performance in FCE, whereas pacing can have a negative influence on some tests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The relation between pain-related fear and disability: a meta-analysis.

          Within a biopsychosocial framework, psychological factors are thought to play an important role in the onset and progression of chronic pain. The cognitive-behavioral fear-avoidance model of chronic pain suggests that pain-related fear contributes to the development and maintenance of pain-related disability. However, investigations of the relation between pain-related fear and disability have demonstrated considerable between-study variation. The main goal of the current meta-analysis was to synthesize findings of studies investigating cross-sectional associations between pain-related fear and disability in order to estimate the magnitude of this relation. We also tested potential moderators, including type of measure used, demographic characteristics, and relevant pain characteristics. Searches in PubMed and PsycINFO yielded a total of 46 independent samples (N = 9,579) that reported correlations between pain-related fear and disability among persons experiencing acute or chronic pain. Effect size estimates were generated using a random-effects model and artifact distribution method. The positive relation between pain-related fear and disability was observed to be moderate to large in magnitude, and stable across demographic and pain characteristics. Although some variability was observed across pain-related fear measures, results were largely consistent with the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The fear avoidance model disentangled: improving the clinical utility of the fear avoidance model.

            The model of fear avoidance proposes that fear of movement in back pain patients is an obstacle to recovery and leads over time to increased disability. Therefore, fear of movement should be targeted explicitly by interventions. To review the evidence (1) for the causal components proposed by the model, and (2) about interventions that attempt to reduce fear of movement. In addition, we aim to propose alternatives and extensions to the current model in order to increase the clinical utility of the model. A collaborative narrative review. The fear avoidance model needs to be conceptually expanded and further tested to provide adequate and appropriate clinical utility. Currently, although there is experimental support for the model, observational studies in patients show contradictory results. Interventions based on the model have not delivered convincing results, only partly due to methodological shortcomings. Some assumptions inherent in the current model need adjusting, and other factors should be incorporated to indicate subgroupings within patients high in avoidance behavior. In addition, both theoretical and methodological limitations were identified in measurements of fear and avoidance. Future research should elucidate whether the proposed subgrouping of patients with avoidance behavior is helpful. Further research should focus on developing more accurate and psychometrically sound assessment tools as well as targeted interventions to improve activities and participation of patients with chronic disabling musculoskeletal pain disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Activity pacing in chronic pain: concepts, evidence, and future directions.

              Activity pacing (AP) is a concept that is central to many chronic pain theories and treatments, yet there remains confusion regarding its definition and effects. To review the current knowledge concerning AP and integrate this knowledge in a manner that allows for a clear definition and useful directions for future research. A narrative review of the major theoretical approaches to AP and of the empirical evidence regarding the effects of AP interventions, followed by an integrative discussion. The concept of AP is derived from 2 main traditions: operant and energy conservation. Although there are common elements across these traditions, significant conceptual and practical differences exist, which has led to confusion. Little empirical evidence exists concerning the efficacy of AP as a treatment for chronic pain. Future research on AP should be based on a clear theoretical foundation, consider the context in which the AP behavior occurs and the type of pacing problem ("underactivity" vs. "overactivity"), and should examine the impact of AP treatment on multiple clinical outcomes. We provide a provisional definition of AP and specific recommendations that we believe will move the field forward.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Pain Res Manag
                Pain Res Manag
                PRM
                Pain Research & Management
                Hindawi
                1203-6765
                1918-1523
                2020
                16 June 2020
                : 2020
                : 1765456
                Affiliations
                1Department for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation Suva, Avenue Grand-Champsec 90, 1950 Sion, Switzerland
                2Institute for Research in Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation Suva, Avenue Grand-Champsec 90, 1950 Sion, Switzerland
                3School of Health Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Valais (HES-SO Valais-Wallis), 1950 Sion, Switzerland
                4Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Orthopaedic Hospital, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Fabio Antonaci

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-8085
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-4970
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-1442
                Article
                10.1155/2020/1765456
                7317324
                991dc0e5-af70-4e09-93a5-3441f0859af0
                Copyright © 2020 Cyrille Burrus et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 October 2019
                : 20 May 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Loterie Suisse Romande (LORO)
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article