9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Long-Term Outcomes and Discard Rate of Kidneys by Decade of Extended Criteria Donor Age

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d3767305e206"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3767305e207">Background and objectives</h5> <p id="d3767305e209">Extended criteria donors represent nowadays a main resource for kidney transplantation, and recovery criteria are becoming increasingly inclusive. However, the limits of this approach are not clear as well as the effects of extreme donor ages on long-term kidney transplantation outcomes. To address these issues, we performed a retrospective study on extended criteria donor kidney transplantation. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d3767305e211"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3767305e212">Design, setting, participants, &amp; measurements</h5> <p id="d3767305e214">In total, 647 consecutive extended criteria donor kidney transplantations performed over 11 years (2003–2013) were included. Donor, recipient, and procedural variables were classified according to donor age decades (group A, 50–59 years old [ <i>n</i>=91]; group B, 60–69 years old [ <i>n</i>=264]; group C, 70–79 years old [ <i>n</i>=265]; and group D, ≥80 years old [ <i>n</i>=27]). Organs were allocated in single- or dual-kidney transplantation after a multistep evaluation including clinical and histologic criteria. Long-term outcomes and main adverse events were analyzed among age groups and in either single- or dual-kidney transplantation. Kidney discard rate incidence and causes were evaluated. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d3767305e228"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3767305e229">Results</h5> <p id="d3767305e231">Median follow-up was 4.9 years (25th; 75th percentiles: 2.7; 7.6 years); patient and graft survival were comparable among age groups (5-year patient survival: group A, 87.8%; group B, 88.1%; group C, 88.0%; and group D, 90.1%; <i>P</i>=0.77; graft survival: group A, 74.0%; group B, 74.2%; group C, 75.2%; and group D, 65.9%; <i>P</i>=0.62) and between dual-kidney transplantation and single-kidney transplantation except for group D, with a better survival for dual-kidney transplantation ( <i>P</i>=0.04). No difference was found analyzing complications incidence or graft function over time. Kidney discard rate was similar in groups A, B, and C (15.4%, 17.7%, and 20.1%, respectively) and increased in group D (48.2%; odds ratio, 5.1 with A as the reference group; 95% confidence interval, 2.96 to 8.79). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d3767305e242"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3767305e243">Conclusions</h5> <p id="d3767305e245">Discard rate and long-term outcomes are similar among extended criteria donor kidney transplantation from donors ages 50–79 years old. Conversely, discard rate was strikingly higher among kidneys from octogenarian donors, but appropriate selection provides comparable long-term outcomes, with better graft survival for dual-kidney transplantation. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

          Elderly patients (ages 70 yr and older) are among the fastest-growing group starting renal-replacement therapy in the United States. The outcomes of elderly patients who receive a kidney transplant have not been well studied compared with those of their peers on the waiting list. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we analyzed data from 5667 elderly renal transplant candidates who initially were wait-listed from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2004. Of these candidates, 2078 received a deceased donor transplant, and 360 received a living donor transplant by 31 December 2005. Time-to-death was studied using Cox regression models with transplant as a time-dependent covariate. Mortality hazard ratios (RRs) of transplant versus waiting list were adjusted for recipient age, sex, race, ethnicity, blood type, panel reactive antibody, year of placement on the waiting list, dialysis modality, comorbidities, donation service area, and time from first dialysis to first placement on the waiting list. Elderly transplant recipients had a 41% lower overall risk of death compared with wait-listed candidates (RR=0.59; P<0.0001). Recipients of nonstandard, that is, expanded criteria donor, kidneys also had a significantly lower mortality risk (RR=0.75; P<0.0001). Elderly patients with diabetes and those with hypertension as a cause of end-stage renal disease also experienced a large benefit. Transplantation offers a significant reduction in mortality compared with dialysis in the wait-listed elderly population with end-stage renal disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Kidney transplantation halts cardiovascular disease progression in patients with end-stage renal disease.

              Morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease have a devastating impact on patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease. Renal function decline in itself is thought to be a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the elevated CV mortality in kidney transplant patients is due to the preexisting CVD burden and that restoring renal function by a kidney transplant might over time lower the risk for CVD. We analyzed 60,141 first-kidney-transplant patients registered in the USRDS from 1995 to 2000 for the primary endpoint of cardiac death by transplant vintage and compared these rates to all 66813 adult kidney wait listed patients by wait listing vintage, covering the same time period. The CVD rates peaked during the first 3 months following transplantation and decreased subsequently by transplant vintage when censoring for transplant loss. This trend could be shown in living and deceased donor transplants and even in patients with end-stage renal disease secondary to diabetes. In contrast, the CVD rates on the transplant waiting list increased sharply and progressively by wait listing vintage. Despite the many mechanisms that may be in play, the enduring theme underlying rapid progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in renal failure is the loss of renal function. The data presented in this paper thus suggest that the development or progression of these lesions could be ameliorated by restoring renal function with a transplant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
                CJASN
                American Society of Nephrology (ASN)
                1555-9041
                1555-905X
                February 07 2017
                February 07 2017
                December 15 2016
                : 12
                : 2
                : 323-331
                Article
                10.2215/CJN.06550616
                5293338
                27979977
                992c45bd-18b4-429c-8fe1-16d7988d5dd4
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article