49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants reduce neutralization sensitivity to convalescent sera and monoclonal antibodies

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-stranded RNA viruses that contain the largest known RNA genomes to date. As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to circulate in the human population, multiple mutations have accumulated over time, which may affect its transmission, virulence and antigenicity. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) elicited by natural infection or vaccination are likely to be a key immune correlate for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. A decline in the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals and reinfections by different viral variants have been reported. 1–3 It is therefore important to gain insights into the infectivity and antigenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Spike-specific antibodies contribute the majority of the neutralizing activity in most convalescent human sera. Two SARS-CoV-2 variants, N501Y.V1 (also known as B.1.1.7 lineage or VOC-202012/01) and N501Y.V2 (B.1.351 lineage), reported from the United Kingdom and South Africa, respectively, contain several mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of Spike and are of particular concern. To address the infectivity and neutralization escape phenotypes potentially caused by these mutations, we used the SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus system to compare the viral infectivity as well as the neutralization activities of convalescent sera and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 variants. The blood samples (n = 40) of 20 patients with COVID-19 obtained in February and October 2020 in Chongqing were previously described. 2 Eight RBD-specific mAbs with neutralizing capability against SARS-CoV-2 were obtained from the blood samples of COVID-19 convalescent patients. 4 DNA sequences encoding the reference strain wild-type (WT) and mutant Spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 were codon-optimized and synthesized by Sino Biological Inc. (Beijing, China) and GenScript Inc. (Nanjing, China). Using a luciferase-expressing lentiviral pseudotype system, we expressed WT and N501Y.V1 (variant 1) and N501Y.V2 (variant 2) mutant Spike proteins in enveloped virions. NAbs were measured by pseudovirus-based assays in 293T-ACE2 cells. The inhibitory dose (ID50) was calculated based on the titers of NAbs. First, the infectivity of pseudotyped viral particles was measured by luciferase assay as previously described. 5 As shown in Fig. 1a, the entry efficiencies of Spike pseudotyped viruses bearing the N501Y variant 1 or variant 2 mutant were ~3 to 4.4 times higher than that of the WT pseudovirus when viral input was normalized, suggesting that these spike variants promote the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Then, we assessed the neutralizing efficacy of 40 convalescent serum samples from 20 individuals at two time points with a pseudovirus neutralization assay. At follow-up time point 1, corresponding to a median of 25 days (range 5–33 days) post symptom onset, most sera were significantly less effective than the WT pseudovirus in neutralizing the N501Y variant 1 and variant 2 (Fig. 1b). The mean NAb titers were 825 for WT, 343 for variant 1, and 148 for variant 2. The neutralizing activity of two samples against N501Y.V1 was reduced by greater than tenfold. Notably, the NAb titers of six samples (30%) decreased below the threshold against variant 2 (Fig. 1b). At ~8 months post symptom onset (follow-up time point 2), 17 samples of 20 participants (85%) retained titers of ID50 > 40 against WT pseudovirus, whereas the NAb titers of 8 samples (40%) and 18 samples (90%) decreased below the threshold against N501Y variant 1 and variant 2, respectively (Fig. 1c). These data indicate that N501Y variant 1 and variant 2 escape neutralizing antibodies in some COVID-19 convalescent sera. Fig. 1 Neutralizing activities of convalescent sera and monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants. a Infectivity of WT and variant pseudoviruses assessed in 293T-ACE2 and A549-ACE2 cells. Cells were inoculated with equivalent doses of each pseudotyped virus. WT, wild-type Spike (GenBank: QHD43416) pseudotyped virus; Variant 1, N501Y.V1 mutant Spike pseudotyped virus (containing the H60/V70 and Y144 deletions and N501Y, A570D, D614G, P681H, T716I, S982A, and D1118H mutations); Variant 2, N501Y.V2 mutant Spike pseudotyped virus (containing the K417N, E484K, N501Y, and D614G mutations). Neutralization of WT and variant pseudoviruses by convalescent sera. Pseudovirus-based neutralization assays were performed to detect neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers against SARS-CoV-2. The thresholds of detection were 1:40 of the ID50. Twenty sera (indicated by circles) were drawn 5 to 33 days post symptom onset (b); 20 sera (indicated by triangles) were drawn ~8 months post symptom onset (c). The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) for tested monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against pseudoviruses (d) and representative neutralization curves (e) In addition, we assessed the impact of these variants on the neutralizing activity of human mAbs isolated from COVID-19 convalescent patients. All eight antibodies potently neutralized the WT pseudovirus, while two mAbs (CQ016 and CQ045) were only minimally affected by the variants. However, the neutralization activities of the six other mAbs were reduced or abolished by either N501Y variant 1 or variant 2 (Fig. 1d). Among them, three mAbs were threefold or more less effective against N501Y.V1 and five against N501Y.V2 (Fig. 1d). Notably, two mAbs (CQ026 and CQ038) showed no neutralizing activity against N501Y.V2. Moreover, variant 2 reduced the neutralization sensitivity with CQ046 by 26-fold, which showed the most potent activity against WT pseudovirus. The IC50 of the mAb CQ046 increased from 7.4 ng/ml (WT) to 194 ng/ml (variant 2) (Fig. 1e). Overall, both N501Y variant 1 and variant 2 reduced neutralization sensitivity to most mAbs tested, while N501Y.V2 even abrogated the neutralizing activity of two mAbs. Our findings indicated that N501Y variant 1 and variant 2 increase viral infectivity compared to that of the reference strain in vitro. Notably, both N501Y variant 1 and variant 2 contain the D614G and N501Y mutations in the Spike protein. The findings that variant 1 and variant 2 enhanced the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro are highly consistent with previous studies, which demonstrated that D614G and N501Y mutations enhanced the fitness and transmissibility of the virus, as evidenced by structure analysis and the increased number of clinical cases. 6,7 Another key question is whether some mutations may enable immune evasion. It has been reported that neutralization escape mutants can be selected by passaging virus in the presence of NAbs. 8 Consistent with other recent studies, 9,10 we observed that two naturally occurring SARS-CoV-2 variants, N501Y variant 1 and variant 2, were more resistant than WT virus to neutralization by some mAbs and convalescent sera from patients who were infected in mid- to late- January 2020 when a “first-wave” virus was circulating in China. Consistently, Spike variants with the H60/V70 deletion or E484K mutation have significantly reduced susceptibility to neutralization by the polyclonal serum antibodies of some individuals. 11,12 Whether these patients are at high risk of reinfection with ‘second-wave’ variants should be explored in further studies. It is also urgent to assess the effectiveness of currently authorized vaccines against these variants. Collectively, this study will be helpful for understanding SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and for the design of vaccines against COVID-19. Given the evolving nature of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome, antibody therapeutics and vaccine development require further considerations to accommodate mutations in Spike that may affect the antigenicity of the virus. Limitations of this study include its small sample size and the use of a nonreplicating pseudovirus system. Therefore, further studies with authentic SARS-CoV-2 viruses are required. Supplementary information Supplementary information

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus

          Summary A SARS-CoV-2 variant carrying the Spike protein amino acid change D614G has become the most prevalent form in the global pandemic. Dynamic tracking of variant frequencies revealed a recurrent pattern of G614 increase at multiple geographic levels: national, regional and municipal. The shift occurred even in local epidemics where the original D614 form was well established prior to the introduction of the G614 variant. The consistency of this pattern was highly statistically significant, suggesting that the G614 variant may have a fitness advantage. We found that the G614 variant grows to higher titer as pseudotyped virions. In infected individuals G614 is associated with lower RT-PCR cycle thresholds, suggestive of higher upper respiratory tract viral loads, although not with increased disease severity. These findings illuminate changes important for a mechanistic understanding of the virus, and support continuing surveillance of Spike mutations to aid in the development of immunological interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding

            Summary The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein mediates viral attachment to ACE2 receptor, and is a major determinant of host range and a dominant target of neutralizing antibodies. Here we experimentally measure how all amino-acid mutations to the RBD affect expression of folded protein and its affinity for ACE2. Most mutations are deleterious for RBD expression and ACE2 binding, and we identify constrained regions on the RBD’s surface that may be desirable targets for vaccines and antibody-based therapeutics. But a substantial number of mutations are well tolerated or even enhance ACE2 binding, including at ACE2 interface residues that vary across SARS-related coronaviruses. However, we find no evidence that these ACE2-affinity enhancing mutations have been selected in current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic isolates. We present an interactive visualization and open analysis pipeline to facilitate use of our dataset for vaccine design and functional annotation of mutations observed during viral surveillance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid Decay of Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Persons with Mild Covid-19

              To the Editor: A recent article suggested the rapid decay of anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG in early infection, 1 but the rate was not described in detail. We evaluated persons who had recovered from Covid-19 and referred themselves to our institution for observational research. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants, with approval by the institutional review board. Blood samples were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect anti–SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain IgG. 2 The ELISA was further modified to precisely quantify serum anti–receptor-binding domain activity in terms of equivalence to the concentration of a control anti–receptor-binding domain monoclonal IgG (CR3022, Creative Biolabs). Infection had been confirmed by polymerase-chain-reaction assay in 30 of the 34 participants. The other 4 participants had had symptoms compatible with Covid-19 and had cohabitated with persons who were known to have Covid-19 but were not tested because of mild illness and the limited availability of testing. Most of the participants had mild illness; 2 received low-flow supplemental oxygen and leronlimab (a CCR5 antagonist), but they did not receive remdesivir. There were 20 women and 14 men. The mean age was 43 years (range, 21 to 68) (see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). A total of 31 of the 34 participants had two serial measurements of IgG levels, and the remaining 3 participants had three serial measurements. The first measurement was obtained at a mean of 37 days after the onset of symptoms (range, 18 to 65), and the last measurement was obtained at a mean of 86 days after the onset of symptoms (range, 44 to 119). The initial mean IgG level was 3.48 log10 ng per milliliter (range, 2.52 to 4.41). On the basis of a linear regression model that included the participants’ age and sex, the days from symptom onset to the first measurement, and the first log10 antibody level, the estimated mean change (slope) was −0.0083 log10 ng per milliliter per day (range, −0.0352 to 0.0062), which corresponds to a half-life of approximately 36 days over the observation period (Figure 1A). The 95% confidence interval for the slope was −0.0115 to −0.0050 log10 ng per milliliter per day (half-life, 26 to 60 days) (Figure 1B). The protective role of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown, but these antibodies are usually a reasonable correlate of antiviral immunity, and anti–receptor-binding domain antibody levels correspond to plasma viral neutralizing activity. Given that early antibody decay after acute viral antigenic exposure is approximately exponential, 3 we found antibody loss that was quicker than that reported for SARS-CoV-1, 4,5 and our findings were more consistent with those of Long et al. 1 Our findings raise concern that humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 may not be long lasting in persons with mild illness, who compose the majority of persons with Covid-19. It is difficult to extrapolate beyond our observation period of approximately 90 days because it is likely that the decay will decelerate. 3 Still, the results call for caution regarding antibody-based “immunity passports,” herd immunity, and perhaps vaccine durability, especially in light of short-lived immunity against common human coronaviruses. Further studies will be needed to define a quantitative protection threshold and rate of decline of antiviral antibodies beyond 90 days.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                liubeizhong@cqmu.edu.cn
                nitang@cqmu.edu.cn
                ahuang@cqmu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Cell Mol Immunol
                Cell Mol Immunol
                Cellular and Molecular Immunology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1672-7681
                2042-0226
                25 February 2021
                : 1-3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.203458.8, ISNI 0000 0000 8653 0555, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases (Ministry of Education), Institute for Viral Hepatitis, Department of Infectious Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital, , Chongqing Medical University, ; Chongqing, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.203458.8, ISNI 0000 0000 8653 0555, Yong-Chuan Hospital, , Chongqing Medical University, ; Chongqing, China
                [3 ]GRID grid.203458.8, ISNI 0000 0000 8653 0555, Department of Immunology, College of Basic Medicine, , Chongqing Medical University, ; Chongqing, China
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0137-1247
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-6646
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-8786
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-7423
                Article
                648
                10.1038/s41423-021-00648-1
                7905196
                33633321
                992dfae0-be53-4b69-8b5b-2fe4342c09d3
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to CSI and USTC 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 24 January 2021
                : 29 January 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: The Emergency Project from the Science & Technology Commission of Chongqing (cstc2020jscx-dxwtB0050, cstc2020jscx-fyzx0053).
                Funded by: The Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases (CQMU, 202005).
                Funded by: The Emergency Project for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia from the Chongqing Medical University (CQMUNCP0302).
                Funded by: the Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases (CQMU, 202005), the Leading Talent Program of CQ CSTC (CSTCCXLJRC201719), and a Major National Science & Technology Program grant (2017ZX10202203) from the Science & Technology Commission of China.
                Categories
                Correspondence

                Immunology
                viral infection,immune evasion
                Immunology
                viral infection, immune evasion

                Comments

                Comment on this article