+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Wall Remodeling after Wall Shear Rate Normalization in Rat Mesenteric Arterial Collaterals

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Previous studies have demonstrated endothelial and smooth muscle hyperplasia occur during arterial luminal expansion associated with elevation of arterial wall shear rates. The current study investigated whether remodeling induced by elevated wall shear would ultimately result in a vessel with intimal and medial cell densities and other wall characteristics similar to control arteries. A rat mesenteric model was used in which collateral wall shear is restored to normal 4 weeks after arterial occlusion. Twelve weeks after shear elevation, paired in vivo measurements indicated that the maximum collateral inner diameter was increased 27–75%. Morphometric evaluation of collateral cross sections indicated that, relative to control arteries, luminal and medial areas were increased 79 ± 22 and 56 ± 15%. Collateral medial cell density was decreased (1.12 ± 0.044 vs. 1.35 ± 0.005 nuclei/1,000 µm<sup>2</sup>) but intimal cell density was similar (2.86 ± 0.166 vs. 2.49 ± 0.102 nuclei/100 µm luminal perimeter). Medial thickness to radius ratio was also similar between control and collateral arteries. Thus, for the wall characteristics evaluated, there are many similarities between enlarged collaterals and control arteries. Comparison of nuclear numbers in arterial cross sections of the current and previous studies suggest that intimal and medial cellular regression is correlated with a decrease in wall shear force toward normal levels.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          J Vasc Res
          Journal of Vascular Research
          S. Karger AG
          August 1998
          07 August 1998
          : 35
          : 4
          : 257-264
          Departments of a Surgery and b Physiology/Biophysics, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind., USA
          25592 J Vasc Res 1998;35:257–264
          © 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Research Paper


          Comment on this article