15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Sex and Gender in Neurodegenerative Diseases

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Neurodegenerative Diseases: 3.0 Impact Factor I 4.3 CiteScore I 0.695 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Mating Vocalizations of Female Frogs: Control and Evolutionary Mechanisms

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vocalization behaviors of anuran amphibians are universally sexually dimorphic. Usually, only male frogs give an advertisement call, while female frog calls are limited to a soft and simple release call which is specifically suppressed at mating. In a very few species, however, female frogs also give mating vocalizations. We examined possible mechanisms for control of this rare heterotypical behavior. At the peripheral level, most differences in temporal and spectral characteristics between female mating calls and the calls of conspecific males related directly to sexual dimorphisms in laryngeal and oblique muscle morphology. At the neural and hormonal level, we first developed an integrated model for control of vocalizations, based primarily on male frog data. When this model is applied to females, female mating vocalizations were most similar to male advertisement calls, rather than being modified release calls. Females may have conscripted preexisting androgen-sensitive neural pathways typically used only by males but present in both sexes. Female mating calls have been heard only during courtship and amplexus. Androgen levels in females at this time are significantly higher than even those levels in males. Because this situation is common in frogs, female mating vocalizations likely evolved independently multiple times. Character optimization suggests that mate location is the most common biological role for female mate calling, but the particular aspects of reproductive biology vary widely across species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Rapping, a female receptive call, initiates male-female duets in the South African clawed frog

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Arginine Vasotocin Injection Increases Probability of Calling in Cricket Frogs, but Causes Call Changes Characteristic of Less Aggressive Males

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Arginine vasotocin facilitation of advertisement calling and call phonotaxis in bullfrogs.

              Eric Boyd (1994)
              Although the neuropeptide arginine vasotocin (AVT) is found in several auditory and vocalization regions of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) brain, its functions in these areas are unknown. We examined the effects of AVT injection on two auditory-evoked reproductive behaviors: advertisement calling in male bullfrogs and call phonotaxis in female bullfrogs. AVT (500 micrograms; intraperitoneal) significantly increased advertisement call frequency and decreased calling latency in male bullfrogs, compared to saline injection. This dose of AVT also significantly decreased the time required for female bullfrogs to reach a call source as well as the latency of females to leave the starting position during call playback. In both males and females, these effects were significant at 0.5 hr and persisted until at least 2 hr after injection. AVT thus facilitated display of two sexually-dimorphic reproductive behaviors in bullfrogs. These effects may be due to direct effects of AVT on auditory processing regions in the bullfrog brain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BBE
                Brain Behav Evol
                10.1159/issn.0006-8977
                Brain, Behavior and Evolution
                S. Karger AG
                0006-8977
                1421-9743
                1999
                April 1999
                29 April 1999
                : 53
                : 4
                : 187-197
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind., USA
                Article
                6594 Brain Behav Evol 1999;53:187–197
                10.1159/000006594
                10343085
                99720fad-b13b-4d64-9c61-653a884e65d5
                © 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 4, References: 124, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Geriatric medicine,Neurology,Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurosciences,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
                Brain,Vasotocin,Mating,Androgen,Evolution,Neural pathway,Female vocalization,Frog,Larynx

                Comments

                Comment on this article