5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings

      research-article
      a , b , a ,
      Neuroimage
      Academic Press
      MEG, DBS artefacts, Filtering, Hampel filter, tSSS, S3P, ICA-MI

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be a very efficient treatment option for movement disorders and psychiatric diseases. To better understand DBS mechanisms, brain activity can be recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG) with the stimulator turned on. However, DBS produces large artefacts compromising MEG data quality due to both the applied current and the movement of wires connecting the stimulator with the electrode. To filter out these artefacts, several methods to suppress the DBS artefact have been proposed in the literature. A comparative study evaluating each method’s effectiveness, however, is missing so far.

          In this study, we evaluate the performance of four artefact rejection methods on MEG data from phantom recordings with DBS acquired with an Elekta Neuromag and a CTF system: (i) Hampel-filter, (ii) spectral signal space projection (S3P), (iii) independent component analysis with mutual information (ICA-MI), and (iv) temporal signal space separation (tSSS). In the sensor space, the largest increase in signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio was achieved by ICA-MI, while the best correspondence in terms of source activations was obtained by tSSS. LCMV beamforming alone was not sufficient to suppress the DBS-induced artefacts.

          Highlights

          • Phantom MEG measurement with Elekta Neuromag and CTF MEG system with DBS.

          • Systematic comparison of cleaning algorithms to remove DBS artefact from MEG data.

          • Sensor level ICA-MI yielded the best results.

          • Source level: tSSS provided the best correspondence to recording without DBS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

          Limitations of traditional magnetoencephalography (MEG) exclude some important patient groups from MEG examinations, such as epilepsy patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, patients with magnetic particles on the head or having magnetic dental materials that cause severe movement-related artefact signals. Conventional interference rejection methods are not able to remove the artefacts originating this close to the MEG sensor array. For example, the reference array method is unable to suppress interference generated by sources closer to the sensors than the reference array, about 20-40 cm. The spatiotemporal signal space separation method proposed in this paper recognizes and removes both external interference and the artefacts produced by these nearby sources, even on the scalp. First, the basic separation into brain-related and external interference signals is accomplished with signal space separation based on sensor geometry and Maxwell's equations only. After this, the artefacts from nearby sources are extracted by a simple statistical analysis in the time domain, and projected out. Practical examples with artificial current dipoles and interference sources as well as data from real patients demonstrate that the method removes the artefacts without altering the field patterns of the brain signals.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.

            Functional connectivity between cortical areas may appear as correlated time behavior of neural activity. It has been suggested that merging of separate features into a single percept ("binding") is associated with coherent gamma band activity across the cortical areas involved. Therefore, it would be of utmost interest to image cortico-cortical coherence in the working human brain. The frequency specificity and transient nature of these interactions requires time-sensitive tools such as magneto- or electroencephalography (MEG/EEG). Coherence between signals of sensors covering different scalp areas is commonly taken as a measure of functional coupling. However, this approach provides vague information on the actual cortical areas involved, owing to the complex relation between the active brain areas and the sensor recordings. We propose a solution to the crucial issue of proceeding beyond the MEG sensor level to estimate coherences between cortical areas. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources (DICS) uses a spatial filter to localize coherent brain regions and provides the time courses of their activity. Reference points for the computation of neural coupling may be based on brain areas of maximum power or other physiologically meaningful information, or they may be estimated starting from sensor coherences. The performance of DICS is evaluated with simulated data and illustrated with recordings of spontaneous activity in a healthy subject and a parkinsonian patient. Methods for estimating functional connectivities between brain areas will facilitate characterization of cortical networks involved in sensory, motor, or cognitive tasks and will allow investigation of pathological connectivities in neurological disorders.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors.

              The equation for the magnetic lead field for a given magnetoencephalography (MEG) channel is well known for arbitrary frequencies omega but is not directly applicable to MEG in the quasi-static approximation. In this paper we derive an equation for omega = 0 starting from the very definition of the lead field instead of using Helmholtz's reciprocity theorems. The results are (a) the transpose of the conductivity times the lead field is divergence-free, and (b) the lead field differs from the one in any other volume conductor by a gradient of a scalar function. Consequently, for a piecewise homogeneous and isotropic volume conductor, the lead field is always tangential at the outermost surface. Based on this theoretical result, we formulated a simple and fast method for the MEG forward calculation for one shell of arbitrary shape: we correct the corresponding lead field for a spherical volume conductor by a superposition of basis functions, gradients of harmonic functions constructed here from spherical harmonics, with coefficients fitted to the boundary conditions. The algorithm was tested for a prolate spheroid of realistic shape for which the analytical solution is known. For high order in the expansion, we found the solutions to be essentially exact and for reasonable accuracies much fewer multiplications are needed than in typical implementations of the boundary element methods. The generalization to more shells is straightforward.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                Academic Press
                1053-8119
                1095-9572
                01 October 2020
                01 October 2020
                : 219
                : 117057
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
                [b ]Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Universitätstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. esther.florin@ 123456hhu.de
                Article
                S1053-8119(20)30543-7 117057
                10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117057
                7443703
                32540355
                99f44774-760f-455a-8563-cb28c181c86b
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 December 2019
                : 5 June 2020
                : 11 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                meg,dbs artefacts,filtering,hampel filter,tsss,s3p,ica-mi
                Neurosciences
                meg, dbs artefacts, filtering, hampel filter, tsss, s3p, ica-mi

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log