1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The association between the public reporting of individual operator outcomes with patient profiles, procedural management, and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational study from the Pan-London PCI (BCIS) Registry using an interrupted time series analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          The public reporting of healthcare outcomes has a number of potential benefits; however, unintended consequences may limit its effectiveness as a quality improvement process. We aimed to assess whether the introduction of individual operator specific outcome reporting after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the UK was associated with a change in patient risk factor profiles, procedural management, or 30-day mortality outcomes in a large cohort of consecutive patients.

          Methods and results

          This was an observational cohort study of 123 780 consecutive PCI procedures from the Pan-London (UK) PCI registry, from January 2005 to December 2015. Outcomes were compared pre- (2005–11) and post- (2011–15) public reporting including the use of an interrupted time series analysis. Patients treated after public reporting was introduced were older and had more complex medical problems. Despite this, reported in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events rates were significantly lower after the introduction of public reporting (2.3 vs. 2.7%, P < 0.0001). Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated evidence of a reduction in 30-day mortality rates after the introduction of public reporting, which was over and above the existing trend in mortality before the introduction of public outcome reporting (35% decrease relative risk 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.77; P < 0.0001).

          Conclusion

          The introduction of public reporting has been associated with an improvement in outcomes after PCI in this data set, without evidence of risk-averse behaviour. However, the lower reported complication rates might suggest a change in operator behaviour and decision-making confirming the need for continued surveillance of the impact of public reporting on outcomes and operator behaviour.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

          Cardiogenic shock remains the major cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Although survival in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI has been shown to be significantly higher at 1 year in those receiving early revascularization vs initial medical stabilization, data demonstrating long-term survival are lacking. To determine if early revascularization affects long-term survival of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI. The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial, an international randomized clinical trial enrolling 302 patients from April 1993 through November 1998 with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (mean [SD] age at randomization, 66 [11] years); long-term follow-up of vital status, conducted annually until 2005, ranged from 1 to 11 years (median for survivors, 6 years). All-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. The group difference in survival of 13 absolute percentage points at 1 year favoring those assigned to early revascularization remained stable at 3 and 6 years (13.1% and 13.2%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.97; log-rank P = .03). At 6 years, overall survival rates were 32.8% and 19.6% in the early revascularization and initial medical stabilization groups, respectively. Among the 143 hospital survivors, a group difference in survival also was observed (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95; P = .03). The 6-year survival rates for the hospital survivors were 62.4% vs 44.4% for the early revascularization and initial medical stabilization groups, respectively, with annualized death rates of 8.3% vs 14.3% and, for the 1-year survivors, 8.0% vs 10.7%. There was no significant interaction between any subgroup and treatment effect. In this randomized trial, almost two thirds of hospital survivors with cardiogenic shock who were treated with early revascularization were alive 6 years later. A strategy of early revascularization resulted in a 13.2% absolute and a 67% relative improvement in 6-year survival compared with initial medical stabilization. Early revascularization should be used for patients with acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock due to left ventricular failure. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000552.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty.

            To determine if morphology of procedure-associated dissections could help predict clinical outcome, angiograms of 691 coronary artery dissections resulting from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were categorized according to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute classification system. Classes of dissection were then correlated with clinical outcome: 543 patients with type B dissections had no increase in morbidity and mortality when compared with patients without dissection, with a similar success rate of 93.7%. Complications in this group were low and compared favorably with complication rates in procedures not associated with dissection. One hundred forty-eight procedures associated with dissections of types C to F had a significant increase in in-hospital complications, including acute closure (31%), need for emergency coronary bypass surgery (37%), myocardial infarction (13%) and repeat angioplasty (24%). The overall clinical success rate for those with types C to F dissection was 38%. The differences in clinical success and acute complications between type B and types C to F dissections were statistically significant at p less than 0.0005 for all variables studied. The angiographic morphology of a dissection during coronary angioplasty can predict clinical outcome, aiding in selection of effective therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.

              Public reporting of patient outcomes is an important tool to improve quality of care, but some observers worry that such efforts will lead clinicians to avoid high-risk patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Heart Journal
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0195-668X
                1522-9645
                August 14 2019
                August 14 2019
                April 10 2019
                August 14 2019
                August 14 2019
                April 10 2019
                : 40
                : 31
                : 2620-2629
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, UK
                [2 ]Department of Cardiology, St. George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, St. George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, 10 Cutcombe Road, London, UK
                [4 ]Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Middlesex, UK
                [5 ]Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, UK
                [6 ]Department of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, UK
                [7 ]Department of Cardiology, St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guys & St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd, London, UK
                [8 ]Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
                Article
                10.1093/eurheartj/ehz152
                9a0627cb-b68d-429a-8a67-326dbaa4a980
                © 2019

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article