22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A case report—“When less is more”: controlled inpatient reduction of anticholinergic burden in a patient with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia

      case-report

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The functional status of an individual with schizophrenia is the defining factor in their quality of life and is closely associated with cognitive abilities, which are impaired in individuals with schizophrenia and considered to be the core symptom of the disorder. The use of psychopharmacotherapy can also have a significant impact on cognitive functioning. The relationship between clozapine treatment and cognitive impairment in individuals with schizophrenia is an intricate one. While some studies have reported a positive effect of clozapine on learning and memory, other studies have found that patients treated with clozapine experienced a decline in cognitive functioning in particular areas. In particular, attention and memory have been shown to deteriorate with rising plasma levels of clozapine. This effect may be attributed to its anticholinergic effect. A reduction in the medication related to anticholinergic burden has been previously found to improve cognitive abilities. In the presented case, we describe a psychotic relapse with delirium symptoms in a patient on clozapine treatment with potentially toxic clozapine blood level. The symptoms of delirium subsided after a clozapine dose adjustment. Gradually lowering the initially very high anticholinergic burden improved the patient's cognitive functioning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          20‐year follow‐up study of physical morbidity and mortality in relationship to antipsychotic treatment in a nationwide cohort of 62,250 patients with schizophrenia (FIN20)

          Antipsychotics are effective in preventing relapses of schizophrenia, but it is generally believed that their long‐term use is harmful for patients’ physical well‐being. However, there are no long‐term studies which have verified this view. This nationwide, register‐based cohort study aimed to assess the risk of hospitalization due to physical health problems, as a marker for severe physical morbidity, and the risk of all‐cause mortality, as well as of cardiovascular and suicidal death, associated with antipsychotic use in all patients treated for schizophrenia in inpatient care between 1972 and 2014 in Finland (N=62,250), with up to 20 years of follow‐up (median: 14.1 years). The use of antipsychotic drugs (i.e., use of any antipsychotic compared with non‐use) and the use of specific antipsychotics were investigated, and outcomes were somatic and cardiovascular hospitalization, and all‐cause, cardiovascular and suicide death. Hospitalization‐based outcomes were analyzed by a within‐individual design to eliminate selection bias, comparing use and non‐use periods in the same individual by stratified Cox model. Mortality outcomes were assessed by traditional between‐individual Cox multivariate models. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for any somatic hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98‐1.03) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.92‐1.07) during use of any antipsychotic compared to non‐exposure periods within the same individual. The aHRs were 0.48 (95% CI: 0.46‐0.51) for all‐cause mortality, 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57‐0.67) for cardiovascular mortality, and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.43‐0.62) for suicide mortality during use vs. non‐use of any antipsychotic. The most beneficial mortality outcome was associated with use of clozapine in terms of all‐cause (aHR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.36‐0.43), cardiovascular (aHR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.47‐0.64) and suicide mortality (aHR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.15‐0.29). The cumulative mortality rates during maximum follow‐up of 20 years were 46.2% for no antipsychotic use, 25.7% for any antipsychotic use, and 15.6% for clozapine use. These data suggest that long‐term antipsychotic use does not increase severe physical morbidity leading to hospitalization, and is associated with substantially decreased mortality, especially among patients treated with clozapine.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cholinergic deficiency hypothesis in delirium: a synthesis of current evidence.

            Deficits in cholinergic function have been postulated to cause delirium and cognitive decline. This review examines current understanding of the cholinergic deficiency hypothesis in delirium by synthesizing evidence on potential pathophysiological pathways. Acetylcholine synthesis involves various precursors, enzymes, and receptors, and dysfunction in these components can lead to delirium. Insults to the brain, like ischemia and immunological stressors, can precipitously alter acetylcholine levels. Imbalances between cholinergic and other neurotransmitter pathways may result in delirium. Furthermore, genetic, enzymatic, and immunological overlaps exist between delirium and dementia related to the cholinergic pathway. Important areas for future research include identifying biomarkers, determining genetic contributions, and evaluating response to cholinergic drugs in delirium. Understanding how the cholinergic pathway relates to delirium may yield innovative approaches in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this common, costly, and morbid condition.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clozapine Response Rates among People with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Data from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

              Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for the 25% to 33% of people with schizophrenia who are treatment resistant, but not all people achieve response. Using data from a previously published clozapine systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the proportion of people who achieved response and examined the absolute and percentage change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores. Overall, 40.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.8%-43.4%) responded, with a mean reduction in PANSS of 22.0 points (95% CI, 20.9-23.1), a reduction of 25.8% (95% CI, 24.7%-26.9%) from baseline. These reductions are clinically meaningful. A 40% response rate to clozapine suggests that 12% to 20% of people with schizophrenia will be ultra-resistant. La clozapine est l’antipsychotique le plus efficace pour les 25 à 33% des personnes souffrant de schizophrénie qui sont réfractaires au traitement; toutefois, les personnes n’obtiennent pas toutes une réponse. À l’aide des données d’une revue systématique et d’une méta-analyse publiées précédemment, nous avons exploré la proportion de gens qui obtenaient une réponse, et examiné le pourcentage absolu et les changements de pourcentage dans les scores à l’échelle des syndromes positifs et négatifs (PANSS). Globalement, 40,1% (IC à 95% 36,8% à 43,4%) ont répondu, avec une réduction moyenne à la PANSS de 22,0 points (IC à 95% 20,9 à 23,1), une réduction de 25,8% (IC à 95% 24,7% à 26,9%) par rapport au départ. Ces réductions sont cliniquement significatives. Un taux de réponse de 40% à la clozapine suggère que de 12% à 20% des personnes souffrant de schizophrénie seront ultra-réfractaires.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                31 July 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1222177
                Affiliations
                Department for Intensive Psychiatric Treatment, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana , Ljubljana, Slovenia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Matej Stuhec, University of Maribor, Slovenia

                Reviewed by: Alasdair Barr, University of British Columbia, Canada; Uma Suryadevara, University of Florida, United States; Suresh Sundram, Monash University, Australia; Pavel Mohr, National Institute of Mental Health, Czechia

                *Correspondence: Milica Pjevac milica.pjevac@ 123456psih-klinika.si
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1222177
                10425236
                37583839
                9a0a028f-5ebf-4269-8754-f80a49b0a0cf
                Copyright © 2023 Pjevac and Korošec Hudnik.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 May 2023
                : 07 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 19, Pages: 5, Words: 3520
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Case Report
                Custom metadata
                Psychopharmacology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                anticholinergic burden,treatment-resistant schizophrenia,cognition,clozapine blood level monitoring,delirium

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log