17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Community-Acquired versus Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis

      meta-analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The different clinical characteristics of community-acquired acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) versus hospital-acquired AKI (HA-AKI) have remained inconclusive, and thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to summarize and quantify the clinical significance distinguishing the 2 types of AKI. Methods: We identified observational studies reporting the clinical characteristics and prognosis of HA-AKI and CA-AKI. ORs and mean differences (MDs) were extracted for each outcome and the results aggregated. The primary outcome was defined as the mortality rate; renal recovery, oliguria incidence, dialysis, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and length of hospital stay were secondary outcomes. Results: Fifteen eligible studies involving 46,157 patients (22,791 CA-AKI patients and 23,366 HA-AKI patients) were included. Mortality was significantly lower in CA-AKI than in HA-AKI patients, with an OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.35–0.53). The incidence of oliguria and need for ICU were also lower in CA-AKI patients (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.88; OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.14–0.40, respectively). CA-AKI patients had a shorter hospital stay (MD –9.42, 95% CI –13.73 to –5.12). The renal recovery rate and dialysis need between CA- and HA-AKI were similar (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.53–3.02; OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.82–1.34, respectively). Conclusions: CA-AKI showed better clinical manifestations with a lower incidence of oliguria, reduced risk of ICU treatment, and shorter hospital stay. Mortality associated with CA-AKI was lower compared with HA-AKI, indicating a better prognosis. The rate of renal recovery and need for dialysis showed no significant difference between the 2 groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury

          Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI. Methods Members representing key societies in critical care and nephrology along with additional experts in adult and pediatric AKI participated in a two day conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in September 2005 and were assigned to one of three workgroups. Each group's discussions formed the basis for draft recommendations that were later refined and improved during discussion with the larger group. Dissenting opinions were also noted. The final draft recommendations were circulated to all participants and subsequently agreed upon as the consensus recommendations for this report. Participating societies endorsed the recommendations and agreed to help disseminate the results. Results The term AKI is proposed to represent the entire spectrum of acute renal failure. Diagnostic criteria for AKI are proposed based on acute alterations in serum creatinine or urine output. A staging system for AKI which reflects quantitative changes in serum creatinine and urine output has been developed. Conclusion We describe the formation of a multidisciplinary collaborative network focused on AKI. We have proposed uniform standards for diagnosing and classifying AKI which will need to be validated in future studies. The Acute Kidney Injury Network offers a mechanism for proceeding with efforts to improve patient outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)

            Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious problem affecting millions and causing death and disability for many. In 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes completed the first ever, international, multidisciplinary, clinical practice guideline for AKI. The guideline is based on evidence review and appraisal, and covers AKI definition, risk assessment, evaluation, prevention, and treatment. In this review we summarize key aspects of the guideline including definition and staging of AKI, as well as evaluation and nondialytic management. Contrast-induced AKI and management of renal replacement therapy will be addressed in a separate review. Treatment recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant trials. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed and a detailed rationale for each recommendation is provided.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group

              Introduction There is no consensus definition of acute renal failure (ARF) in critically ill patients. More than 30 different definitions have been used in the literature, creating much confusion and making comparisons difficult. Similarly, strong debate exists on the validity and clinical relevance of animal models of ARF; on choices of fluid management and of end-points for trials of new interventions in this field; and on how information technology can be used to assist this process. Accordingly, we sought to review the available evidence, make recommendations and delineate key questions for future studies. Methods We undertook a systematic review of the literature using Medline and PubMed searches. We determined a list of key questions and convened a 2-day consensus conference to develop summary statements via a series of alternating breakout and plenary sessions. In these sessions, we identified supporting evidence and generated recommendations and/or directions for future research. Results We found sufficient consensus on 47 questions to allow the development of recommendations. Importantly, we were able to develop a consensus definition for ARF. In some cases it was also possible to issue useful consensus recommendations for future investigations. We present a summary of the findings. (Full versions of the six workgroups' findings are available on the internet at ) Conclusion Despite limited data, broad areas of consensus exist for the physiological and clinical principles needed to guide the development of consensus recommendations for defining ARF, selection of animal models, methods of monitoring fluid therapy, choice of physiological and clinical end-points for trials, and the possible role of information technology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                KBR
                Kidney Blood Press Res
                10.1159/issn.1420-4096
                Kidney and Blood Pressure Research
                S. Karger AG
                1420-4096
                1423-0143
                2019
                November 2019
                25 September 2019
                : 44
                : 5
                : 879-896
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDivision of Nephrology, Kidney Institute of CPLA, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
                [_b] bThird Hospital of Xi’an, Department of Anesthesiology, Xi’an, China
                [_c] cMedical team of 32120 troop of PLA, Dalian, China
                Author notes
                *Prof. Zhi-Guo Mao and Jing Xu, MD, PhD, Division of Nephrology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003 (China), E-Mail maozhiguo@smmu.edu.cn and joexujing@163.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4132-9406
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-4538
                Article
                502546 Kidney Blood Press Res 2019;44:879–896
                10.1159/000502546
                31553972
                9a0bd8ed-83aa-4da6-be4b-435407edccbf
                © 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 15 April 2019
                : 06 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 1, Pages: 18
                Categories
                Meta-Analysis

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Community-acquired,Acute kidney injury,Hospital-acquired,Clinical characteristics

                Comments

                Comment on this article