10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An efficient and robust laboratory workflow and tetrapod database for larger scale environmental DNA studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The use of environmental DNA for species detection via metabarcoding is growing rapidly. We present a co-designed lab workflow and bioinformatic pipeline to mitigate the 2 most important risks of environmental DNA use: sample contamination and taxonomic misassignment. These risks arise from the need for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification to detect the trace amounts of DNA combined with the necessity of using short target regions due to DNA degradation.

          Findings

          Our high-throughput workflow minimizes these risks via a 4-step strategy: (i) technical replication with 2 PCR replicates and 2 extraction replicates; (ii) using multi-markers ( 12S,16S,CytB); (iii) a “twin-tagging,” 2-step PCR protocol; and (iv) use of the probabilistic taxonomic assignment method PROTAX, which can account for incomplete reference databases. Because annotation errors in the reference sequences can result in taxonomic misassignment, we supply a protocol for curating sequence datasets. For some taxonomic groups and some markers, curation resulted in >50% of sequences being deleted from public reference databases, owing to (i) limited overlap between our target amplicon and reference sequences, (ii) mislabelling of reference sequences, and (iii) redundancy. Finally, we provide a bioinformatic pipeline to process amplicons and conduct PROTAX assignment and tested it on an invertebrate-derived DNA dataset from 1,532 leeches from Sabah, Malaysia. Twin-tagging allowed us to detect and exclude sequences with non-matching tags. The smallest DNA fragment ( 16S) amplified most frequently for all samples but was less powerful for discriminating at species rank. Using a stringent and lax acceptance criterion we found 162 (stringent) and 190 (lax) vertebrate detections of 95 (stringent) and 109 (lax) leech samples.

          Conclusions

          Our metabarcoding workflow should help research groups increase the robustness of their results and therefore facilitate wider use of environmental and invertebrate-derived DNA, which is turning into a valuable source of ecological and conservation information on tetrapods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers.

          With a standard set of primers directed toward conserved regions, we have used the polymerase chain reaction to amplify homologous segments of mtDNA from more than 100 animal species, including mammals, birds, amphibians, fishes, and some invertebrates. Amplification and direct sequencing were possible using unpurified mtDNA from nanogram samples of fresh specimens and microgram amounts of tissues preserved for months in alcohol or decades in the dry state. The bird and fish sequences evolve with the same strong bias toward transitions that holds for mammals. However, because the light strand of birds is deficient in thymine, thymine to cytosine transitions are less common than in other taxa. Amino acid replacement in a segment of the cytochrome b gene is faster in mammals and birds than in fishes and the pattern of replacements fits the structural hypothesis for cytochrome b. The unexpectedly wide taxonomic utility of these primers offers opportunities for phylogenetic and population research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Not All Sequence Tags Are Created Equal: Designing and Validating Sequence Identification Tags Robust to Indels

            Ligating adapters with unique synthetic oligonucleotide sequences (sequence tags) onto individual DNA samples before massively parallel sequencing is a popular and efficient way to obtain sequence data from many individual samples. Tag sequences should be numerous and sufficiently different to ensure sequencing, replication, and oligonucleotide synthesis errors do not cause tags to be unrecoverable or confused. However, many design approaches only protect against substitution errors during sequencing and extant tag sets contain too few tag sequences. We developed an open-source software package to validate sequence tags for conformance to two distance metrics and design sequence tags robust to indel and substitution errors. We use this software package to evaluate several commercial and non-commercial sequence tag sets, design several large sets (maxcount = 7,198) of edit metric sequence tags having different lengths and degrees of error correction, and integrate a subset of these edit metric tags to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and sequencing adapters. We validate a subset of these edit metric tagged PCR primers and sequencing adapters by sequencing on several platforms and subsequent comparison to commercially available alternatives. We find that several commonly used sets of sequence tags or design methodologies used to produce sequence tags do not meet the minimum expectations of their underlying distance metric, and we find that PCR primers and sequencing adapters incorporating edit metric sequence tags designed by our software package perform as well as their commercial counterparts. We suggest that researchers evaluate sequence tags prior to use or evaluate tags that they have been using. The sequence tag sets we design improve on extant sets because they are large, valid across the set, and robust to the suite of substitution, insertion, and deletion errors affecting massively parallel sequencing workflows on all currently used platforms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The future of ancient DNA: Technical advances and conceptual shifts.

              Technological innovations such as next generation sequencing and DNA hybridisation enrichment have resulted in multi-fold increases in both the quantity of ancient DNA sequence data and the time depth for DNA retrieval. To date, over 30 ancient genomes have been sequenced, moving from 0.7× coverage (mammoth) in 2008 to more than 50× coverage (Neanderthal) in 2014. Studies of rapid evolutionary changes, such as the evolution and spread of pathogens and the genetic responses of hosts, or the genetics of domestication and climatic adaptation, are developing swiftly and the importance of palaeogenomics for investigating evolutionary processes during the last million years is likely to increase considerably. However, these new datasets require new methods of data processing and analysis, as well as conceptual changes in interpreting the results. In this review we highlight important areas of future technical and conceptual progress and discuss research topics in the rapidly growing field of palaeogenomics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gigascience
                Gigascience
                gigascience
                GigaScience
                Oxford University Press
                2047-217X
                April 2019
                13 April 2019
                13 April 2019
                : 8
                : 4
                : giz029
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Ecological Dynamics, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 Jiaochang East Rd, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China
                [3 ]Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University 859 Sherbooke Street West, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3A 2K6
                [5 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR47TJ, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Jan Axtner, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Ecological Dynamics, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany, E-mail: axtner@ 123456izw-berlin.de
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-5586
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-4383
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-8879
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-9186
                Article
                giz029
                10.1093/gigascience/giz029
                6461710
                9a24f593-c3d6-458c-a5cb-3ff15b6aab0b
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 June 2018
                : 12 October 2018
                : 07 March 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Frauen 10.13039/501100006603
                Award ID: 01LN1301A
                Funded by: MEME Erasmus Mundus Programme in Evolutionary Biology
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 41661144002
                Award ID: 31670536
                Award ID: 31400470
                Award ID: 31500305
                Funded by: Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences
                Award ID: QYZDY-SSW-SMC024
                Funded by: Bureau of International Cooperation 10.13039/501100005200
                Award ID: GJHZ1754
                Funded by: Chinese Academy of Sciences 10.13039/501100002367
                Award ID: XDA20050202
                Award ID: XDB31000000
                Funded by: Ministry of Science and Technology of China
                Award ID: 2012FY110800
                Funded by: State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution 10.13039/501100011239
                Categories
                Technical Note

                metabarcoding,invertebrate-derived -dna,environmental dna,leeches

                Comments

                Comment on this article