Blog
About

294
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    9
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Paradigms in the trade–climate nexus: ‘liberal environmentalism’, the Environmental Goods Agreement and the role of the EU

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          What explains the evolution of negotiations on liberalising environmentally friendly goods and services over the past 15 years and the EU’s position on these? In December 2016 negotiators did not succeed in their goal of concluding an Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA) in Geneva. This was considered by many participants and observers as a missed opportunity for a win-win for the global economy and the environment. Protectionist wrangling over which products should be on a list for speedy liberalisation was seen as the main reason why the negotiations (temporarily) failed. However, we show that the environmental objectives of these negotiations had already gradually been pushed to the back by commercial objectives. While there had been attempts in early phases of the negotiations to make the environmental effects of goods primordial, in the end a commercial logic prevailed. We point to the importance of the paradigm of ‘liberal environmentalism’, which makes it difficult to promote trade-conditioning measures in an already commercially biased policy subsystem. We focus particularly on the EU as one of the key actors in the EGA negotiations. Through a number of interviews with European policy-makers and civil society representatives, and desk research of negotiating documents and secondary literature, we find evidence of the prevalence of liberal environmentalist thinking, the dominance of trade actors in the policy subsystem and difficulties for environmental actors to penetrate these negotiations. We conclude that trying to reconcile trade and environmental objectives in a synergetic (‘win-win’) manner does not make a successful conclusion necessarily easier.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The new trade politics and EU competition policy: shopping for convergence and co-operation

           Chad Damro (2006)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why TTIP is a game-changer and its critics have a point

              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              EWLR
              Europe and the World: A law review
              Eur. World
              UCL Press
              2399-2875
              26 June 2019
              : 3
              : 1
              Affiliations
              Centre for EU Studies, Ghent University, Belgium
              Author notes
              Article
              EWLR-3-4
              10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2019.11
              © 2019, Marie Musch and Ferdi De Ville.

              This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2019.11.

              Counts
              Pages: 13
              Categories
              Article
              Custom metadata
              M. Musch, F. De Ville, ‘Paradigms in the trade–climate nexus: ‘liberal environmentalism’, the Environmental Goods Agreement and the role of the EU’ [2019] 3(1): 4. Europe and the World: A law review [13]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2019.11.

              Comments

              Comment on this article

              Europe and the World: A law review
              Volume 3, Issue 1

              Similar content 47

              Most referenced authors 6