18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The conservation physiology toolbox: status and opportunities

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For over a century, physiological tools and techniques have been allowing researchers to characterize how organisms respond to changes in their natural environment and how they interact with human activities or infrastructure. Over time, many of these techniques have become part of the conservation physiology toolbox, which is used to monitor, predict, conserve, and restore plant and animal populations under threat. Here, we provide a summary of the tools that currently comprise the conservation physiology toolbox. By assessing patterns in articles that have been published in ‘Conservation Physiology’ over the past 5 years that focus on introducing, refining and validating tools, we provide an overview of where researchers are placing emphasis in terms of taxa and physiological sub-disciplines. Although there is certainly diversity across the toolbox, metrics of stress physiology (particularly glucocorticoids) and studies focusing on mammals have garnered the greatest attention, with both comprising the majority of publications (>45%). We also summarize the types of validations that are actively being completed, including those related to logistics (sample collection, storage and processing), interpretation of variation in physiological traits and relevance for conservation science. Finally, we provide recommendations for future tool refinement, with suggestions for: (i) improving our understanding of the applicability of glucocorticoid physiology; (ii) linking multiple physiological and non-physiological tools; (iii) establishing a framework for plant conservation physiology; (iv) assessing links between environmental disturbance, physiology and fitness; (v) appreciating opportunities for validations in under-represented taxa; and (vi) emphasizing tool validation as a core component of research programmes. Overall, we are confident that conservation physiology will continue to increase its applicability to more taxa, develop more non-invasive techniques, delineate where limitations exist, and identify the contexts necessary for interpretation in captivity and the wild.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide.

          Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis has become one of the most powerful and widely used techniques available to plant physiologists and ecophysiologists. This review aims to provide an introduction for the novice into the methodology and applications of chlorophyll fluorescence. After a brief introduction into the theoretical background of the technique, the methodology and some of the technical pitfalls that can be encountered are explained. A selection of examples is then used to illustrate the types of information that fluorescence can provide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Oxidative stress as a mediator of life history trade-offs: mechanisms, measurements and interpretation.

              The concept of trade-offs is central to our understanding of life-history evolution. The underlying mechanisms, however, have been little studied. Oxidative stress results from a mismatch between the production of damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the organism's capacity to mitigate their damaging effects. Managing oxidative stress is likely to be a major determinant of life histories, as virtually all activities generate ROS. There is a recent burgeoning of interest in how oxidative stress is related to different components of animal performance. The emphasis to date has been on immediate or short-term effects, but there is an increasing realization that oxidative stress will influence life histories over longer time scales. The concept of oxidative stress is currently used somewhat loosely by many ecologists, and the erroneous assumption often made that dietary antioxidants are necessarily the major line of defence against ROS-induced damage. We summarize current knowledge on how oxidative stress occurs and the different methods for measuring it, and highlight where ecologists can be too simplistic in their approach. We critically review the potential role of oxidative stress in mediating life-history trade-offs, and present a framework for formulating appropriate hypotheses and guiding experimental design. We indicate throughout potentially fruitful areas for further research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Conserv Physiol
                Conserv Physiol
                conphys
                Conservation Physiology
                Oxford University Press
                2051-1434
                2018
                19 June 2018
                19 June 2018
                : 6
                : 1
                : coy029
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave., Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, 1201 N. Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, AZ, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4. Tel: +1 5192533000x2701. Email: madlige@ 123456uwindsor.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8554-0764
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-0659
                Article
                coy029
                10.1093/conphys/coy029
                6007632
                29942517
                9a69c7c7-f6ba-4ceb-8aa6-3d26776fb837
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 March 2018
                : 18 May 2018
                : 24 May 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: Canada Research Chairs Program
                Funded by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 10.13039/501100000038
                Funded by: US Department of Agriculture 10.13039/100000199
                Award ID: 2015-67013-23138
                Funded by: National Institute of Food and Agriculture 10.13039/100005825
                Award ID: 2015-67013-23138
                Categories
                Perspective

                tools,techniques,glucocorticoid,validation,biomarker
                tools, techniques, glucocorticoid, validation, biomarker

                Comments

                Comment on this article