0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Neonatal Skeletal Maturation in Congenital Hypothyroidism and Its Prognostic Value for Psychomotor Development at 3 Years in Patients Treated Early

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neonatal skeletal maturation was assessed by different methods based on the bone centres in the knee and ankle region in 46 infants with true-positive (patients) and 17 infants with false-positive screening tests (controls). The patients and controls did not differ in mean age at X-ray examination and age at the start of treatment (14.5 ± 5.7 days). One of the methods used to score the size of femoral and tibial epiphyses was just as good as the other ones tested, but has the advantage of being the easiest to use and therefore clinically most suitable. Skeletal maturity assessed by this method correlated best with serum T<sub>4</sub> (r = 0.62, p < 0.01). Griffiths tests were performed in 37 of the 46 patients at 28-48 months of life. The best correlation obtained between neonatal skeletal maturity and Griffiths global developmental quotient at 3 years of age was r = 0.58 (p < 0.001). Although statistically significant, it was too weak to be of clinical value in identifying individual patients at risk. We conclude that an assessment of skeletal maturation is not useful for the prognosis of psychomotor development in individual patients with congenital hypothyroidism receiving treatment within the first 2 weeks of life.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          HRE
          Horm Res Paediatr
          10.1159/issn.1663-2818
          Hormone Research in Paediatrics
          S. Karger AG
          1663-2818
          1663-2826
          1990
          1990
          02 December 2008
          : 33
          : 6
          : 260-264
          Affiliations
          aDepartment of Paediatrics, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala; bDepartment of Paediatric Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, St. Göran’s Children’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
          Article
          181532 Horm Res 1990;33:260–264
          10.1159/000181532
          2289785
          © 1990 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 5
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article