32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.

      ,
      British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Overemphasis on hypothesis testing--and the use of P values to dichotomise significant or non-significant results--has detracted from more useful approaches to interpreting study results, such as estimation and confidence intervals. In medical studies investigators are usually interested in determining the size of difference of a measured outcome between groups, rather than a simple indication of whether or not it is statistically significant. Confidence intervals present a range of values, on the basis of the sample data, in which the population value for such a difference may lie. Some methods of calculating confidence intervals for means and differences between means are given, with similar information for proportions. The paper also gives suggestions for graphical display. Confidence intervals, if appropriate to the type of study, should be used for major findings in both the main text of a paper and its abstract.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)
          British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)
          0267-0623
          0267-0623
          Mar 15 1986
          : 292
          : 6522
          Article
          1339793
          3082422
          9accf8eb-3cba-41e8-aae5-5d77e6e2ccd7
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article