18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Elastography of Endometrium in Women Taking Tamoxifen: A New Approach to an Old Diagnostic Problem

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tamoxifen is a commonly used selective estrogen receptor modulator applied in the treatment for breast cancer. However, in the endometrium, Tamoxifen stimulates tissue growth, cellular transformation, the migration of the cells, and metastatic potential in endometrial cancer. Considering that uterine cancer is the most common neoplasm of the reproductive tract and the third most common neoplastic disease in women, the aim of this study was to investigate if applying elastography in examining the endometrium was beneficial for uterine cancer screening protocols in women on selective estrogen receptor modulator therapy. This study was based on the execution of a classic assessment of the endometrium that included the evaluation of the following: echogenicity, central endometrial stripe, presence of fluid in the uterine lumen, myometrium–endometrium interface, intensity of vascularization and vascular pattern. An ultrasound presentation was then processed and analyzed with elastography. The values of the elastography parameters demonstrated good consistency for the measurement of the softest endometrial layer thickness in elastography. A strong positive correlation (R = 0.56) was demonstrated between the endometrial thickness, as determined by ultrasound examination, and the softest endometrial layer in elastography ( p < 0.001). The research showed that the elastography measurements of the width of the softest endometrium layer, based on a population of women taking Tamoxifen, appeared to be a promising option for endometrial cancer screening.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology.

          The technical part of these Guidelines and Recommendations, produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, provides an introduction to the physical principles and technology on which all forms of current commercially available ultrasound elastography are based. A difference in shear modulus is the common underlying physical mechanism that provides tissue contrast in all elastograms. The relationship between the alternative technologies is considered in terms of the method used to take advantage of this. The practical advantages and disadvantages associated with each of the techniques are described, and guidance is provided on optimisation of scanning technique, image display, image interpretation and some of the known image artefacts. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology.

            Conventional diagnostic ultrasound images of the anatomy (as opposed to blood flow) reveal differences in the acoustic properties of soft tissues (mainly echogenicity but also, to some extent, attenuation), whereas ultrasound-based elasticity images are able to reveal the differences in the elastic properties of soft tissues (e.g., elasticity and viscosity). The benefit of elasticity imaging lies in the fact that many soft tissues can share similar ultrasonic echogenicities but may have different mechanical properties that can be used to clearly visualize normal anatomy and delineate pathologic lesions. Typically, all elasticity measurement and imaging methods introduce a mechanical excitation and monitor the resulting tissue response. Some of the most widely available commercial elasticity imaging methods are 'quasi-static' and use external tissue compression to generate images of the resulting tissue strain (or deformation). In addition, many manufacturers now provide shear wave imaging and measurement methods, which deliver stiffness images based upon the shear wave propagation speed. The goal of this review is to describe the fundamental physics and the associated terminology underlying these technologies. We have included a questions and answers section, an extensive appendix, and a glossary of terms in this manuscript. We have also endeavored to ensure that the terminology and descriptions, although not identical, are broadly compatible across the WFUMB and EFSUMB sets of guidelines on elastography (Bamber et al. 2013; Cosgrove et al. 2013).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

              The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: Prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                28 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 9
                : 12
                : 3870
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinic of Gynecology, Oncological Gynecology and Obstetrics, Municipal Polyclinical Hospital in Olsztyn, Niepodległości Str. 44, 10-045 Olsztyn, Poland; jabkrys@ 123456op.pl (K.J.); lukasz.kurek@ 123456uwm.edu.pl (Ł.K.); maciej.zukowski@ 123456uwm.edu.pl (M.Ż.); natared@ 123456o2.pl (N.D.-J.)
                [2 ]Department of Oncology and Immunooncology, Hospital Ministry of the Interior and Administration with Warmia and Mazury Oncology Center, Olsztyn, Wojska Polskiego Ave. 37, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland; karolina.gornowicz@ 123456wp.pl
                [3 ]Department of Statistics and Medical Informatics, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Szpitalna Str. 37, 15-295 Białystok, Poland; anna.milewska@ 123456umb.edu.pl
                [4 ]Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Żołnierska Str 18, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland; aleksandra.lipka@ 123456uwm.edu.pl
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: marcin.jozwik@ 123456uwm.edu.pl ; Tel.: +48-89-532-64-40
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-6635
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-2758
                Article
                jcm-09-03870
                10.3390/jcm9123870
                7760647
                33260709
                9ad775fe-284c-45f3-98b2-25cead21e973
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 October 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                elastography,endometrium,endometrial cancer,endometrial cancer screening,serm therapy,the softest endometrium layer,tamoxifen,ultrasonography

                Comments

                Comment on this article