5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Preparation and Evaluation of Potent Pentafluorosulfanyl Substituted Anti-Tuberculosis Compounds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The global fight to stop tuberculosis (TB) remains a great challenge, particularly with the increase in drug resistant strains and a lack of funding to support the development of new treatments. To bolster a precarious drug pipeline, we have prepared a focused panel of eight pentafluorosulfanyl (SF 5) compounds ( 13 – 20) which were screened for their activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv in three different assay conditions and media. All eight compounds had sub-micromolar potency and four ( 13, 15, 16, and 19) displayed MICs <100 nM. Seven compounds ( 13 – 19) were evaluated against non-replicating and mono-drug-resistant Mtb, and for their ability to inhibit Mtb within the macrophage. The greatest potency was observed against intracellular Mtb (MIC <10 nM for 13, 15, and 17), which is often the most challenging to target. In general, the SF 5-bearing compounds were very similar to their CF 3 counterparts with the major differences observed being their in vitro ADME properties. SF 5-bearing compounds 18 and 19 had greater protein binding than the corresponding CF 3 compounds ( 1 and 5) but also were less metabolized in human microsomes resulting in longer half-lives.

          TOC image

          A focused set of pentafluorosulfanyl (SF 5) compounds were prepared and evaluated against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv in multiple assays. Overall the compounds demonstrated great potency against replicating Mtb particularly within the macrophage. However, in other evaluations (non-replicating Mtb, drug-resistant Mtb, MBC, and toxicity) these compounds began to show differences between each other.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101259013
          33017
          ChemMedChem
          ChemMedChem
          ChemMedChem
          1860-7179
          1860-7187
          17 August 2017
          27 June 2017
          20 July 2017
          20 July 2018
          : 12
          : 14
          : 1108-1115
          Affiliations
          [a ]Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, 103 Chemistry and Biochemistry, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 ( USA)
          [b ]Tuberculosis Research Section, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases, ( LCID), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID), National Institutes of Health ( NIH), 33 North Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 ( USA)
          [c ]Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, 347 Nieuwland Hall of Science, Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556 ( USA)
          Article
          PMC5603227 PMC5603227 5603227 nihpa896981
          10.1002/cmdc.201700170
          5603227
          28654200
          9af05756-5d77-4682-a502-a52e3335ac9d
          History
          Categories
          Article

          imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine,imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole,pentafluorosulfanyl,drug-resistant,Mycobacterium tuberculosis

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_

          Similar content232

          Cited by4