6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The menu varies with metabarcoding practices: A case study with the bat Plecotus auritus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Metabarcoding of feces has revolutionized the knowledge of animal diets by providing unprecedented resolution of consumed resources. However, it is still unclear how different methodological approaches influence the ecological conclusions that can be drawn from such data. Here, we propose a critical evaluation of several data treatments on the inferred diet of the bat Plecotus auritus using guano regularly collected from various colonies throughout the entire active season. First and unlike previous claims, our data indicates that DNA extracted from large amounts of fecal material issued from guano accumulates yield broader taxonomic diversity of prey than smaller numbers of pellets would do, provided that extraction buffer volumes are adapted to such increased amounts of material. Second, trophic niche analyses based on prey occurrence data uncover strong seasonality in the bat’s diet and major differences among neighboring maternity colonies. Third, while the removal of rare prey items is not always warranted as it introduces biases affecting particularly samples with greater prey species richness. Fourth, examination of distinct taxonomic depths in diet analyses highlights different aspects of food consumption providing a better understanding of the consumer’s diet. Finally, the biologically meaningful patterns recovered with presence-absence approaches are virtually lost when attempting to quantify prey consumed using relative read abundances. Even in an ideal situation where reference barcodes are available for most potential prey species, inferring realistic patterns of prey consumption remains relatively challenging. Although best practice in metabarcoding analyses will depend on the aims of the study, several previous methodological recommendations seem unwarranted for studying such diverse diets as that of brown long-eared bats.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Structure of Lizard Communities

          E Pianka (1973)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

              Abstract Advances in DNA sequencing technology have revolutionized the field of molecular analysis of trophic interactions, and it is now possible to recover counts of food DNA sequences from a wide range of dietary samples. But what do these counts mean? To obtain an accurate estimate of a consumer's diet should we work strictly with data sets summarizing frequency of occurrence of different food taxa, or is it possible to use relative number of sequences? Both approaches are applied to obtain semi‐quantitative diet summaries, but occurrence data are often promoted as a more conservative and reliable option due to taxa‐specific biases in recovery of sequences. We explore representative dietary metabarcoding data sets and point out that diet summaries based on occurrence data often overestimate the importance of food consumed in small quantities (potentially including low‐level contaminants) and are sensitive to the count threshold used to define an occurrence. Our simulations indicate that using relative read abundance (RRA) information often provides a more accurate view of population‐level diet even with moderate recovery biases incorporated; however, RRA summaries are sensitive to recovery biases impacting common diet taxa. Both approaches are more accurate when the mean number of food taxa in samples is small. The ideas presented here highlight the need to consider all sources of bias and to justify the methods used to interpret count data in dietary metabarcoding studies. We encourage researchers to continue addressing methodological challenges and acknowledge unanswered questions to help spur future investigations in this rapidly developing area of research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                5 July 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 7
                : e0219135
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology, Natural History Museum of Geneva, CP, CH, Geneva, Switzerland
                [2 ] Section of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet, Geneva, Switzerland
                [3 ] Laboratoire de Génétique de la Conservation, Université de Liège, Institut de Botanique B22, Liège, Belgium
                [4 ] Comportement et Écologie de la Faune Sauvage (CEFS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Auzeville, Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France
                [5 ] CIRAD, Agirs Unit, TA C- 22/E- Campus international de Baillarguet, Montpellier Cedex, France
                Stockholm University, SWEDEN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-7475
                Article
                PONE-D-18-35736
                10.1371/journal.pone.0219135
                6611578
                31276547
                9b353b0e-25b8-47dc-b703-b241fcfe2202
                © 2019 Andriollo et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 December 2018
                : 17 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Pages: 17
                Funding
                This study benefitted from the financial support from the Direction Générale de l'Agriculture et de la Nature de l’État de Genève and the Fondation Ernst & Lucie Schmidheiny. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Niches
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Niches
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Bats
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Taxonomy
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Data Management
                Taxonomy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Predation
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Predation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Sociality
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Sociality
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Sociality
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Custom metadata
                Raw DNA sequences of prey of Plecotus auritus: available on Zenodo doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3240538.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article