17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Did hardening occur among smokers in England from 2000 to 2010?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims To assess trends in the prevalence of ‘hardcore’ smoking in England between 2000 and 2010, and to examine associations between hardcore smoking and socio-demographic variables.

          Design Secondary analysis of data from the United Kingdom's General Lifestyle Survey (GLF) and the Health Survey for England (HSE).

          Setting Households in England.

          Participants Self-reported adult current smokers resident in England aged 26 years and over.

          Measurements Hardcore smokers were defined in three ways: smokers who do not want to quit (D1), those who ‘usually’ smoke their first cigarette of the day within 30 minutes of waking (D2) and a combination of D1 and D2, termed D3. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore associations between these variables and calendar year, age, sex and socio-economic status, and P-values for trends in odds were calculated.

          Findings The odds of smokers being defined as hardcore according to D3 increased over time in both the GLF ( P < 0.001) and HSE ( P = 0.04), even after adjusting for risk factors. Higher dependence (D2) was noted in men [odds ratio (OR): 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.24], those of 50–59 years (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.80–2.09) and smokers in lower occupational groups (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: (1.97–2.26). Lack of motivation to quit (D1) increased with age and was more likely in men.

          Conclusions The proportion of smokers in England with both low motivation to quit and high dependence appears to have increased between 2000 and 2010, independently of risk factors, suggesting that ‘hardening’ may be occurring in this smoker population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

          M Siahpush (2006)
          To examine the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit. Data were from the first wave (2002) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey (ITC-4), a panel study of over 2000 adult smokers from each of four countries: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Data were collected via telephone interviews. Nicotine dependence, intention to quit, and self-efficacy to quit smoking were the main outcome measures used in this study. Lower levels of education were associated with higher nicotine dependence. The effect of lower income on higher heaviness of smoking index (HIS) scores was significant in Canada, the UK, and Australia. Respondents with low education had 35% larger odds of low self-efficacy than those with high education. Respondents with low education had 40% larger odds of having no intention to quit than those with high education. Respondents with low income had 23% larger odds of having no intention to quit than those with high income. Country was not a moderator of the association of SES with self-efficacy and intention to quit. To the extent that lower SES smokers are more addicted, they are likely to need more intensive support if they are to be successful in their attempts to quit. Given their lower incomes, this places a special responsibility on government to provide or subsidise such services. This should include access to the widest possible range of effective pharmacotherapies complemented with evidence based counselling and support.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interventions to increase smoking cessation at the population level: how much progress has been made in the last two decades?

            This paper reviews the literature on smoking cessation interventions, with a focus on the last 20 years (1991 to 2010). These two decades witnessed major development in a wide range of cessation interventions, from pharmacotherapy to tobacco price increases. It was expected that these interventions would work conjointly to increase the cessation rate on the population level. This paper examines population data from the USA, from 1991 to 2010, using the National Health Interview Surveys. Results indicate there is no consistent trend of increase in the population cessation rate over the last two decades. Various explanations are presented for this lack of improvement, and the key concept of impact = effectiveness × reach is critically examined. Finally, it suggests that the field of cessation has focused so much on developing and promoting interventions to improve smokers' odds of success that it has largely neglected to investigate how to get more smokers to try to quit and to try more frequently. Future research should examine whether increasing the rate of quit attempts would be key to improving the population cessation rate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future.

              Smoke-free policies have been an important tobacco control intervention. As recently as 20 years ago, few communities required workplaces and hospitality venues to be smoke-free, but today approximately 11% of the world's population live in countries with laws that require these places to be smoke-free. This paper briefly summarises important milestones in the history of indoor smoke-free policies, the role of scientific research in facilitating their adoption, a framework for smoke-free policy evaluation and industry efforts to undermine regulations. At present, smoke-free policies centre on workplaces, restaurants and pubs. In addition, many jurisdictions are now beginning to implement policies in outdoor areas and in shared multiunit housing settings. The future of smoke-free policy development depends on credible scientific data that documents the health risks of secondhand smoke exposure. Over the next 20 years smoke-free policies will very likely extend to outdoor and private areas, and changes in the types of tobacco products that are consumed may also have implications for the nature and scope of the smoke-free policies of the future.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Addiction
                Addiction
                add
                Addiction (Abingdon, England)
                John Wiley & Sons Ltd
                0965-2140
                1360-0443
                January 2014
                28 October 2013
                : 109
                : 1
                : 147-154
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK
                [2 ]UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London London, UK
                [3 ]Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Site Herston, Qld, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Graeme Docherty, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. E-mail: graeme.docherty@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk
                Article
                10.1111/add.12359
                3933730
                24103060
                9b6c5458-af0a-430c-856c-67dde2965e1a
                © 2013 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 08 February 2013
                : 27 March 2013
                : 09 September 2013
                Categories
                Research Report

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                cessation,dependence,hardcore,hardening,inequalities,population
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                cessation, dependence, hardcore, hardening, inequalities, population

                Comments

                Comment on this article