0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Split-dose sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate colonoscopy preparation achieves lower residual gastric volume with higher cleansing effectiveness than a previous-day regimen.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is known that sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate (SPMC) bowel preparations are effective, well tolerated and safe, and that split-dosing is more effective for colon cleansing than previous-day regimens. Anesthetic guidelines consider that residual gastric fluid is independent of clear liquid fasting times. However, reluctance to use split-dosing persists. This may be due to limited data on residual gastric fluid volumes (RGFVs) and split-dosing bowel preparations, and that these may not be perceived as standard clear liquids. Furthermore, no studies are available on RGFV/residual gastric fluid pH (RGFpH) and SPMC. We aimed to evaluate the cleansing effectiveness and the RGFV/RGFpH achieved after an SPMC split-dosing regimen compared with a SPMC previous-day regimen.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Gastrointest. Endosc.
          Gastrointestinal endoscopy
          Elsevier BV
          1097-6779
          0016-5107
          Mar 2016
          : 83
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Gastroenterology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
          [2 ] Anesthesiology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
          Article
          S0016-5107(15)02626-7
          10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.054
          26272858
          9b8a47db-53b7-4bff-8f0c-85da438ebbed
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_

          Similar content343

          Cited by8