19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reclassification of genetic-based risk predictions as GWAS data accumulate

      research-article
      , , ,
      Genome Medicine
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Disease risk assessments based on common genetic variation have gained widespread attention and use in recent years. The clinical utility of genetic risk profiles depends on the number and effect size of identified loci, and how stable the predicted risks are as additional loci are discovered. Changes in risk classification for individuals over time would undermine the validity of common genetic variation for risk prediction. In this analysis, we quantified reclassification of genetic risk based on past and anticipated future GWAS data.

          Methods

          We identified disease-associated SNPs via the NHGRI GWAS catalog and recent large scale genome-wide association study (GWAS). We calculated the genomic risk for a simulated cohort of 100,000 individuals based on a multiplicative odds ratio model using cumulative GWAS-identified SNPs at four time points: 2007, 2009, 2011, and 2013. Individuals were classified as Higher Risk (population adjusted odds >2), Average Risk (between 0.5 and 2), and Lower Risk (<0.5) for each time point and we compared classifications between time points for breast cancer (BrCa), prostate cancer (PrCa), diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2D), and cardiovascular heart disease (CHD). We estimated future reclassification using the anticipated number of undiscovered SNPs.

          Results

          Risk reclassification occurred for all four phenotypes from 2007 to 2013. During the most recent interval (2011-2013), the degree of risk reclassification ranged from 16.3 % for CHD to 24.4 % for PrCa. Many individuals classified as Higher Risk at earlier time points were subsequently reclassified into a lower risk category. From 2011 to 2013, the degree of such downward risk reclassification ranged from 24.9 % for T2D to 55 % for CHD. The percent of individuals classified as Higher Risk increased as more SNPs were discovered, ranging from an increase of 5 % for CHD to 9 % for PrCa from 2007 to 2013. Reclassification continued to occur when we modeled the discovery of anticipated SNPs based on doubling current sample size.

          Conclusion

          Risk estimates from common genetic variation show large reclassification rates. Identifying disease-associated SNPs facilitates the clinically relevant task of identifying higher-risk individuals. However, the large amount of reclassification that we demonstrated in individuals initially classified as Higher Risk but later as Average Risk or Lower Risk, suggests that caution is currently warranted in basing clinical decisions on common genetic variation for many complex diseases.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0272-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

          The c statistic, or area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, achieved popularity in diagnostic testing, in which the test characteristics of sensitivity and specificity are relevant to discriminating diseased versus nondiseased patients. The c statistic, however, may not be optimal in assessing models that predict future risk or stratify individuals into risk categories. In this setting, calibration is as important to the accurate assessment of risk. For example, a biomarker with an odds ratio of 3 may have little effect on the c statistic, yet an increased level could shift estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk for an individual patient from 8% to 24%, which would lead to different treatment recommendations under current Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Accepted risk factors such as lipids, hypertension, and smoking have only marginal impact on the c statistic individually yet lead to more accurate reclassification of large proportions of patients into higher-risk or lower-risk categories. Perfectly calibrated models for complex disease can, in fact, only achieve values for the c statistic well below the theoretical maximum of 1. Use of the c statistic for model selection could thus naively eliminate established risk factors from cardiovascular risk prediction scores. As novel risk factors are discovered, sole reliance on the c statistic to evaluate their utility as risk predictors thus seems ill-advised.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genome-wide association and replication studies identify four variants associated with prostate cancer susceptibility.

            We report a prostate cancer genome-wide association follow-on study. We discovered four variants associated with susceptibility to prostate cancer in several European populations: rs10934853[A] (OR = 1.12, P = 2.9 x 10(-10)) on 3q21.3; two moderately correlated (r2 = 0.07) variants, rs16902094[G] (OR = 1.21, P = 6.2 x 10(-15)) and rs445114[T] (OR = 1.14, P = 4.7 x 10(-10)), on 8q24.21; and rs8102476[C] (OR = 1.12, P = 1.6 x 10(-11)) on 19q13.2. We also refined a previous association signal on 11q13 with the SNP rs11228565[A] (OR = 1.23, P = 6.7 x 10(-12)). In a multivariate analysis using 22 prostate cancer risk variants typed in the Icelandic population, we estimated that carriers in the top 1.3% of the risk distribution are at a 2.5 times greater risk of developing the disease than members of the general population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jkrier@partners.org
                rbarfield01@fas.harvard.edu
                rcgreen@genetics.harvard.edu
                pkraft@hsph.harvard.edu
                Journal
                Genome Med
                Genome Med
                Genome Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-994X
                17 February 2016
                17 February 2016
                2016
                : 8
                : 20
                Affiliations
                [ ]Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
                [ ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
                [ ]Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
                [ ]Partners Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA USA
                [ ]Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA
                [ ]Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
                [ ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
                Article
                272
                10.1186/s13073-016-0272-5
                4756503
                26884246
                9b911a36-98b0-40d8-8390-57bd77c152d1
                © Krier et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 2 April 2015
                : 25 January 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000051, National Human Genome Research Institute (US);
                Award ID: U01 HG006500
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health (US);
                Award ID: T32 GM007748-34
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000051, National Human Genome Research Institute (US);
                Award ID: U01 HG006500
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000051, National Human Genome Research Institute (US);
                Award ID: U01 HG006500
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health (US);
                Award ID: T32 GM074897
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health (US);
                Award ID: T32 ES007142
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Molecular medicine
                Molecular medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article