5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Practices, perceptions, and attitudes in the evaluation of critically ill children for bacteremia: a national survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          Sending blood cultures in children at low risk of bacteremia can contribute to a cascade of unnecessary antibiotic exposure, adverse effects, and increased costs. We aimed to describe practice variation, clinician beliefs, and attitudes about blood culture testing in critically ill children.

          Design:

          Cross-sectional electronic survey

          Setting:

          15 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) enrolled in the Bright Star collaborative, an investigation of blood culture use in critically ill children in the United States

          Subjects:

          PICU (bedside nurses, resident physicians, fellow physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and attending physicians)

          Interventions:

          None

          Measurement and Main Results:

          Survey items explored typical blood culture practices, attitudes and beliefs about cultures, and potential barriers to changing culture use in a PICU setting. 15/15 sites participated, with 347 total responses, 15-45 responses per site, and an overall median response rate of 57%. We summarized median proportions and interquartile ranges of respondents who reported certain practices or beliefs: 86% (73%-91%) report that cultures are ordered reflexively; 71% (61%-77%) do not examine patients before ordering cultures; 90% (86%-94%) obtain cultures for any new fever in PICU patients; 33% (19%-61%) do not obtain peripheral cultures when an indwelling catheter is in place, and 64% (36%-81%) sample multiple (vs single) lumens of central venous catheters for new fever. When asked about barriers to reducing unnecessary cultures, 80% (73%- 90%) noted fear of missing sepsis. Certain practices (culture source and indication) varied by clinician type. Obtaining surveillance cultures and routinely culturing all possible sources (each lumen of indwelling catheters and peripheral specimens) are positively correlated with baseline blood culture rates.

          Conclusions:

          There is variation in blood culture practices in the PICU. Fear and reflexive habits are common drivers of cultures. These practices may contribute to over-testing for bacteremia. Further investigation of how to optimize blood culture use is warranted.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          100954653
          30237
          Pediatr Crit Care Med
          Pediatr Crit Care Med
          Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
          1529-7535
          5 October 2019
          January 2020
          01 January 2021
          : 21
          : 1
          : e23-e29
          Affiliations
          [a ]Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
          [b ]The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
          [c ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
          [d ]Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
          [e ]Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital
          [f ]Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
          [g ]Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
          [h ]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
          [i ]Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
          [j ]Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
          Author notes
          Corresponding author address: Charlotte Z Woods-Hill, MD, Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd. Wood Building, 6 th floor, Suite 6026A, Philadelphia, PA 19104. woodshillc@ 123456email.chop.edu .
          Article
          PMC6942229 PMC6942229 6942229 hhspa1540884
          10.1097/PCC.0000000000002176
          6942229
          31702704
          9b9b4fde-9631-4f2f-ab56-497f96968594
          History
          Categories
          Article

          quality improvement,infection,clinical decision-making,sepsis,bacteremia,blood culture

          Comments

          Comment on this article