11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bovine Pericardium Patch Wrapping Intestinal Anastomosis Improves Healing Process and Prevents Leakage in a Pig Model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Failure of intestinal anastomosis is a major complication following abdominal surgery. Biological materials have been introduced as reinforcement of abdominal wall hernia in contaminated setting. An innovative application of biological patch is its use as reinforcement of gastrointestinal anastomosis. The aim of study was to verify whether the bovine pericardium patch improves the healing of anastomosis, when in vivo wrapping the suture line of pig intestinal anastomosis, avoiding leakage in the event of deliberately incomplete suture. Forty-three pigs were randomly divided: Group 1 (control, n = 14): hand-sewn ileo-ileal and colo-colic anastomosis; Group 2 (n = 14): standard anastomosis wrapped by pericardium bovine patch; Group 3 (n = 1) and 4 (n = 14): one suture was deliberately incomplete and also wrapped by patch in the last one. Intraoperative evaluation, histological, biochemical, tensiometric and electrophysiological studies of intestinal specimens were performed at 48 h, 7 and 90 days after. In groups 2 and 4, no leak, stenosis, abscess, peritonitis, mesh displacement or shrinkage were found and adhesion rate decreased compared to control. Biochemical studies showed mitochondrial function improvement in colic wrapped anastomosis. Tensiometric evaluations suggested that the patch preserves the colic contractility similar to the controls. Electrophysiological results demonstrated that the patch also improves the mucosal function restoring almost normal transport properties. Use of pericardium bovine patch as reinforcement of intestinal anastomosis is safe and effective, significantly improving the healing process. Data of prevention of acute peritonitis and leakage in cases of iatrogenic perforation of anastomoses, covered with patch, is unpublished.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

          The impact of anastomotic leakage on immediate postoperative mortality in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer is well recognized. Its impact on long-term survival is less clear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between anastomotic leakage and long-term survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. A total of 2235 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 in Scotland were included in the study. Five-year survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios were calculated. Fourteen (16 per cent) of the 86 patients with an anastomotic leak died within 30 days of surgery compared with 83 (3.9 per cent) of 2149 without a leak. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate, including postoperative deaths, was 42 per cent in patients with an anastomotic leak compared with 66.9 per cent in those with no leak (P < 0.001). Excluding postoperative deaths, respective values were 50 and 68.0 per cent (P < 0.001). The adjusted relative hazard ratios, for patients with an anastomotic leak compared with those without a leak, and excluding 30-day mortality, were 1.61 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.19 to 2.16; P = 0.002) for overall survival and 1.99 (95 per cent c.i. 1.42 to 2.79; P < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival. Development of an anastomotic leak is associated with worse long-term survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Copyright 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study.

            To assess anastomotic leak (AL) risk factors in a large patient series. Case-control study. The Mount Sinai Hospital. Ninety patients with AL following colorectal resection and 180 patients who underwent uncomplicated procedures. Risk factors associated with development of AL. The AL rate was 2.6%. Five risk factors for AL were identified: (1) preoperative albumin level lower than 3.5 g/dL (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.1) (P = .03); (2) operative time of 200 minutes or longer (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.0-5.8) (P = .01); (3) intraoperative blood loss of 200 mL or more (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.3) (P = .01); (4) intraoperative transfusion requirement (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.5) (P = .02); and (5) histologic specimen margin involvement in disease process in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.1) (P = .01). Patients with all 3 intraoperative risk factors had an OR of 22.1; 95% CI, 2.8-175.4 (P < .001) for development of AL. Histologic resection margin involvement in disease process in patients with IBD, preoperative albumin levels lower than 3.5 g/dL, intraoperative blood loss of 200 mL or more, operative time of 200 minutes or more, and/or intraoperative transfusion requirement increased AL risk. Enteral nutritional optimization prior to elective surgery is essential. Proximal diversion should be considered for patients with all 3 intraoperative risk factors because they are at high risk for AL.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mucosal in vitro permeability in the intestinal tract of the pig, the rat, and man: species- and region-related differences.

              The barrier properties of the gastrointestinal mucosa may be studied by measuring its permeability to different-sized marker molecules. Owing to difficulties in obtaining human tissue it is, however, often necessary to extrapolate findings from experimental animals to man. The aim of the present study was to compare regional intestinal mucosal permeability in man, the rat, and the pig, using the same marker molecules and in vitro technique. Segments from jejunum, ileum, colon, and rectum were mounted in Ussing diffusion chambers, and the mucosa-to-serosa passage of 14C-mannitol, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran 4,400, alpha-lactalbumin, ovalbumin, and FITC-dextran 70,000 was studied. Irrespective of species or intestinal region an inverse relationship between the molecular weight of the markers and the permeability was seen. The mannitol permeability was higher in the small intestine than in the colon in man, whereas the rat showed a higher permeability in the ileum than in the jejunum and colon. The FITC-dextran 4,400 permeability was higher in all intestinal regions in the rat than in man and the pig. The macromolecules showed low permeability with no regional differences. The results showed differences between intestinal regions and between species. Permeability data from the pig correlated fairly well with those of man, whereas the rat differed, making it difficult to extrapolate from the rat to man.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                29 January 2014
                : 9
                : 1
                : e86627
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Medicine “A. Murri”, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [3 ]Department Basic Medical Sciences, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Unit of Pathology, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Unit of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of Pharmachology, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [7 ]Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Pharmacological Sciences, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                [8 ]Department of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Division of Veterinary Clinics and Animal Productions, University Medical School “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
                University of Catania, Italy
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MT AG PP SS AM GP AC. Performed the experiments: MT AG PP SS AM GP GL LG MADS LB LD NS FS MRC AC. Analyzed the data: MT AG PP SS AM MADS LB LD NS MRC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MT AG PP SS AM GP GL LG MADS LB LD NS FS MRC AC. Wrote the paper: AG PP SS AM FS.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-46134
                10.1371/journal.pone.0086627
                3906076
                24489752
                9bc9ade9-fc50-4ea0-b651-4232cabadc48
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 November 2013
                : 16 December 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                The authors have no support or funding to report.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Biochemistry
                Biochemistry Simulations
                Model Organisms
                Animal Models
                Molecular Cell Biology
                Medicine
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Clinical Research Design
                Animal Models of Disease
                Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Surgery
                Gastrointestinal Surgery
                General Surgery

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article