19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The role of financial hardship, mastery and social support in the association between employment status and depression: results from an Australian longitudinal cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          There is robust epidemiological and clinical evidence of the harmful effects of unemployment on psychological well-being, but the mechanisms through which this occurs is still strongly debated. In addition, there is even less evidence on the impact of underemployment on mental health. Using longitudinal data collected from a cohort of 20–24 years old, the present study examines a range of employed states and investigates the role of mastery, financial hardship and social support in the relationship between labour status and depression.

          Method

          Responses were from the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life Project: A representative, community-based survey conducted in Canberra and Queanbeyan (NSW) in Australia, where respondents (n=2404) in their early twenties were followed for 8 years. Depression was measured using the self-report Goldberg Depression Scale, with the likely presence of depression being indicated by scores 7 or greater.

          Results

          The analyses identified unemployment and underemployment as significant predictors of depression, compared to their employed counterparts. Both unemployment and underemployment remained significantly correlated with depression even after accounting for sociodemographic, economic and psychological variables. Social support, financial hardship and a sense of personal control (mastery) all emerged as important mediators between unemployment and depression.

          Conclusions

          Both unemployment and underemployment were associated with increased risk of depression. The strength of this relationship was attenuated but remained significant after accounting for key variables (mastery, financial hardship and social support), and extensive sociodemographic and health covariates, indicating that no or inade­quate employment contributes to poorer mental health over and above these factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being.

            The authors examined social class differences in 2 aspects of the sense of control (mastery and perceived constraints) in 3 national probability samples of men and women ages 25-75 years (N1 = 1,014; N2 = 1,195; N3 = 3,485). Participants with lower income had lower perceived mastery and higher perceived constraints, as well as poorer health. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that for all income groups, higher perceived mastery and lower perceived constraints were related to better health, greater life satisfaction, and lower depressive symptoms. However, control beliefs played a moderating role; participants in the lowest income group with a high sense of control showed levels of health and well-being comparable with the higher income groups. The results provided some evidence that psychosocial variables such as sense of control may be useful in understanding social class differences in health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A motivational theory of life-span development.

              This article had four goals. First, the authors identified a set of general challenges and questions that a life-span theory of development should address. Second, they presented a comprehensive account of their Motivational Theory of Life-Span Development. They integrated the model of optimization in primary and secondary control and the action-phase model of developmental regulation with their original life-span theory of control to present a comprehensive theory of development. Third, they reviewed the relevant empirical literature testing key propositions of the Motivational Theory of Life-Span Development. Finally, because the conceptual reach of their theory goes far beyond the current empirical base, they pointed out areas that deserve further and more focused empirical inquiry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2016
                27 May 2016
                : 6
                : 5
                : e009834
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Research School of Psychology, Australian National University , Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
                [2 ]Research School of Population Health , Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
                [3 ]Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [4 ]Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Laura Crowe; Laura.Crowe@ 123456anu.edu.au
                Article
                bmjopen-2015-009834
                10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009834
                4885313
                27235296
                9bd51258-9c8e-4c20-af67-305c2731f0e1
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 26 August 2015
                : 22 March 2016
                : 21 April 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian National University, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000995;
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925;
                Award ID: 179805
                Award ID: 418039
                Award ID: 973302
                Funded by: Australian Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923;
                Award ID: #FT 130101444
                Categories
                Mental Health
                Research
                1506
                1712
                1692

                Medicine
                epidemiology,unemployment,depression,financial hardship,mastery,underemployment
                Medicine
                epidemiology, unemployment, depression, financial hardship, mastery, underemployment

                Comments

                Comment on this article