6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rethinking palliative care in a public health context: addressing the needs of persons with non-communicable chronic diseases

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26
      Primary Health Care Research & Development
      Cambridge University Press
      integrated, multimorbidity, non-communicable chronic diseases (NCCDs), palliative care, public health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Non-communicable chronic diseases (NCCDs) are the main cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Demographic aging has resulted in older populations with more complex healthcare needs. This necessitates a multilevel rethinking of healthcare policies, health education and community support systems with digitalization of technologies playing a central role. The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Aging (A3) working group focuses on well-being for older adults, with an emphasis on quality of life and healthy aging. A subgroup of A3, including multidisciplinary stakeholders in health care across Europe, focuses on the palliative care (PC) model as a paradigm to be modified to meet the needs of older persons with NCCDs. This development paper delineates the key parameters we identified as critical in creating a public health model of PC directed to the needs of persons with NCCDs. This paradigm shift should affect horizontal components of public health models. Furthermore, our model includes vertical components often neglected, such as nutrition, resilience, well-being and leisure activities. The main enablers identified are information and communication technologies, education and training programs, communities of compassion, twinning activities, promoting research and increasing awareness amongst policymakers. We also identified key ‘bottlenecks’: inequity of access, insufficient research, inadequate development of advance care planning and a lack of co-creation of relevant technologies and shared decision-making. Rethinking PC within a public health context must focus on developing policies, training and technologies to enhance person-centered quality life for those with NCCD, while ensuring that they and those important to them experience death with dignity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

          Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospital for older adults admitted as an emergency. Search strategy We searched the EPOC Register, Cochrane’s Controlled Trials Register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AARP Ageline, and handsearched high yield journals. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials of comprehensive geriatric assessment (whether by mobile teams or in designated wards) compared with usual care. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a multidimensional interdisciplinary diagnostic process used to determine the medical, psychological, and functional capabilities of a frail elderly person to develop a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long term follow-up. Data collection and analysis Three independent reviewers assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted published data. Two additional reviewers moderated. Results Twenty two trials evaluating 10 315 participants in six countries were identified. For the primary outcome “living at home,” patients who underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment were more likely to be alive and in their own homes at the end of scheduled follow-up (odds ratio 1.16 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.28; P=0.003; number needed to treat 33) at a median follow-up of 12 months versus 1.25 (1.11 to 1.42; P<0.001; number needed to treat 17) at a median follow-up of six months) compared with patients who received general medical care. In addition, patients were less likely to be living in residential care (0.78, 0.69 to 0.88; P<0.001). Subgroup interaction suggested differences between the subgroups “wards” and “teams” in favour of wards. Patients were also less likely to die or experience deterioration (0.76, 0.64 to 0.90; P=0.001) and were more likely to experience improved cognition (standardised mean difference 0.08, 0.01 to 0.15; P=0.02) in the comprehensive geriatric assessment group. Conclusions Comprehensive geriatric assessment increases patients’ likelihood of being alive and in their own homes after an emergency admission to hospital. This seems to be especially true for trials of wards designated for comprehensive geriatric assessment and is associated with a potential cost reduction compared with general medical care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.

            There is increasing concern about the quality, reliability, and independence of practice guidelines. Because no information is available on the methodological quality of the guidelines developed by specialty societies, we undertook a survey on those published in peer-reviewed journals. Practice guidelines produced by specialty societies and published in English between January, 1988, and July, 1998, where identified through MEDLINE. Their quality was assessed in terms of whether they reported: the type of professionals and stakeholders involved in the development process; the strategy to identify primary evidence; and an explicit grading of recommendations according to the quality of supporting evidence. Overall, 431 guidelines were eligible for the study. Most did not meet the criteria: 67% did not report any description of the type of stakeholders, 88% gave no information on searches for published studies, and 82% did not give any explicit grading of the strength of recommendations. There was improvement over time for searches (from 2% to 18%, p<0.001) and explicit grading of evidence (from 6% to 27%, p<0.001). All three criteria for quality were met in only 22 (5%) guidelines. Despite improvement over time, the quality of practice guidelines developed by specialty societies is unsatisfactory. Explicit methodological criteria for the production of guidelines shared among public agencies, scientific societies, and patients' associations need to be set up. Common standards of reporting, following the same principles that led to the CONSORT statement for randomised clinical trials, should be promoted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Telemedicine in Cancer Care

              Telemedicine uses telecommunications technology as a tool to deliver health care to populations with limited access to care. Telemedicine has been tested in multiple clinical settings, demonstrating at least equivalency to in-person care and high levels of patient and health professional satisfaction. Teleoncology has been demonstrated to improve access to care and decrease health care costs. Teleconsultations may take place in a synchronous, asynchronous, or blended format. Examples of successful teleoncology applications include cancer telegenetics, bundling of cancer-related teleapplications, remote chemotherapy supervision, symptom management, survivorship care, palliative care, and approaches to increase access to cancer clinical trials. Telepathology is critical to cancer care and may be accomplished synchronously and asynchronously for both cytology and tissue diagnoses. Mobile applications support symptom management, lifestyle modification, and medication adherence as a tool for home-based care. Telemedicine can support the oncologist with access to interactive tele-education. Teleoncology practice should maintain in-person professional standards, including documentation integrated into the patient’s electronic health record. Telemedicine training is essential to facilitate rapport, maximize engagement, and conduct an accurate virtual exam. With the appropriate attachments, the only limitation to the virtual exam is palpation. The national telehealth resource centers can provide interested clinicians with the latest information on telemedicine reimbursement, parity, and practice. To experience the gains of teleoncology, appropriate training, education, as well as paying close attention to gaps, such as those inherent in the digital divide, are essential.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prim Health Care Res Dev
                Prim Health Care Res Dev
                PHC
                Primary Health Care Research & Development
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                1463-4236
                1477-1128
                2020
                15 September 2020
                : 21
                : e32
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Israel Gerontological Data Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Jerusalem, Israel
                [2 ]MELABEV – Community Clubs for Elders , Jerusalem, Israel
                [3 ]Public Health Agency of Northern Ireland , Belfast, UK
                [4 ]The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland , Galway, Ireland
                [6 ]Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro, University of Aveiro , Aveiro, Portugal
                [7 ]Psycho-Oncology Unit, ANT Italia Foundation , Bologna, Italy
                [8 ]ANT Italia Foundation , Bologna, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University of Naples , Naples, Italy
                [10 ]Department of Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                [11 ]Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp , Antwerp, Belgium
                [12 ]Research and Development Unit, Federico II University Hospital , Naples, Italy
                [13 ]Hospital Care Division, General Directorate for Health , Campania Region, Naples, Italy
                [14 ]Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete , Heraklion, Crete, Greece
                [15 ]Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete , Heraklion, Crete, Greece
                [16 ]Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health (FPS) , Seville, Spain
                [17 ]Interdisciplinary Health Research Center (CIIS), Institute of Health Sciences, Portuguese Catholic University , Lisbon, Portugal
                [18 ]Faculty of Pharmacy, Center for Pharmaceutical Studies, University of Coimbra , Coimbra, Portugal
                [19 ]Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University College of Cork , Cork, Ireland
                [20 ]Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata , Rome, Italy
                [21 ]Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples , Naples, Italy
                [22 ]Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples , Naples, Italy
                [23 ]Department of Computing Science, Umeå University , Umeå, Sweden
                [24 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria
                [25 ]Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples , Naples, Italy
                [26 ]Health Innovation Division, General Directorate for Health , Campania Region, Naples, Italy
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: Chariklia Tziraki, Israel Gerontological Data Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem , Ramban Street 1, 9242202Jerusalem, Israel. E-mail: tziraki@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2662-6023
                Article
                S1463423620000328
                10.1017/S1463423620000328
                7503185
                32928334
                9be38a6c-1cdf-44cc-9e7e-8a2f76d002f8
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 February 2020
                : 18 June 2020
                : 14 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, References: 110, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Development

                integrated,multimorbidity,non-communicable chronic diseases (nccds),palliative care,public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article