69
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Social network size in humans

      ,
      Human Nature
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper examines social network size in contemporary Western society based on the exchange of Christmas cards. Maximum network size averaged 153.5 individuals, with a mean network size of 124.9 for those individuals explicitly contacted; these values are remarkably close to the group size of 150 predicted for humans on the basis of the size of their neocortex. Age, household type, and the relationship to the individual influence network structure, although the proportion of kin remained relatively constant at around 21%. Frequency of contact between network members was primarily determined by two classes of variable: passive factors (distance, work colleague, overseas) and active factors (emotional closeness, genetic relatedness). Controlling for the influence of passive factors on contact rates allowed the hierarchical structure of human social groups to be delimited. These findings suggest that there may be cognitive constraints on network size.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Core Discussion Networks of Americans

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The social brain hypothesis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Human Nature
                Hum Nat
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1045-6767
                1936-4776
                March 2003
                March 2003
                : 14
                : 1
                : 53-72
                Article
                10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y
                26189988
                9c1d4d2e-7da3-430b-804c-978184fbd17a
                © 2003

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article