144
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Formal language theory (FLT), part of the broader mathematical theory of computation, provides a systematic terminology and set of conventions for describing rules and the structures they generate, along with a rich body of discoveries and theorems concerning generative rule systems. Despite its name, FLT is not limited to human language, but is equally applicable to computer programs, music, visual patterns, animal vocalizations, RNA structure and even dance. In the last decade, this theory has been profitably used to frame hypotheses and to design brain imaging and animal-learning experiments, mostly using the ‘artificial grammar-learning’ paradigm. We offer a brief, non-technical introduction to FLT and then a more detailed analysis of empirical research based on this theory. We suggest that progress has been hampered by a pervasive conflation of distinct issues, including hierarchy, dependency, complexity and recursion. We offer clarifications of several relevant hypotheses and the experimental designs necessary to test them. We finally review the recent brain imaging literature, using formal languages, identifying areas of convergence and outstanding debates. We conclude that FLT has much to offer scientists who are interested in rigorous empirical investigations of human cognition from a neuroscientific and comparative perspective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ventral and dorsal pathways for language.

          Built on an analogy between the visual and auditory systems, the following dual stream model for language processing was suggested recently: a dorsal stream is involved in mapping sound to articulation, and a ventral stream in mapping sound to meaning. The goal of the study presented here was to test the neuroanatomical basis of this model. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a novel diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based tractography method we were able to identify the most probable anatomical pathways connecting brain regions activated during two prototypical language tasks. Sublexical repetition of speech is subserved by a dorsal pathway, connecting the superior temporal lobe and premotor cortices in the frontal lobe via the arcuate and superior longitudinal fascicle. In contrast, higher-level language comprehension is mediated by a ventral pathway connecting the middle temporal lobe and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex via the extreme capsule. Thus, according to our findings, the function of the dorsal route, traditionally considered to be the major language pathway, is mainly restricted to sensory-motor mapping of sound to articulation, whereas linguistic processing of sound to meaning requires temporofrontal interaction transmitted via the ventral route.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing.

              Functional dissociations within the neural basis of auditory sentence processing are difficult to specify because phonological, syntactic and semantic information are all involved when sentences are perceived. In this review I argue that sentence processing is supported by a temporo-frontal network. Within this network, temporal regions subserve aspects of identification and frontal regions the building of syntactic and semantic relations. Temporal analyses of brain activation within this network support syntax-first models because they reveal that building of syntactic structure precedes semantic processes and that these interact only during a later stage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                19 July 2012
                19 July 2012
                : 367
                : 1598 , Theme Issue 'Pattern perception and computational complexity' compiled and edited by W. Tecumseh Fitch, Angela D. Friederici and Peter Hagoort
                : 1933-1955
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cognitive Biology, simpleUniversity of Vienna , Althanstrasse 14, Vienna 1090, Austria
                [2 ]simpleMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences , Stephanstrasse 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence ( tecumseh.fitch@ 123456univie.ac.at ).

                One contribution of 13 to a Theme Issue ‘ Pattern perception and computational complexity’.

                Article
                rstb20120103
                10.1098/rstb.2012.0103
                3367694
                22688631
                9c39caaa-b7a5-47b8-9bac-08194e1200ce
                This journal is © 2012 The Royal Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                42
                44
                133
                70
                203
                Articles
                Review Article

                Philosophy of science
                formal language theory,artificial grammar learning,comparative neuroscience,neurolinguistics

                Comments

                Comment on this article