1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Theoretical orientation of a range of psychological approaches to address mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Sir, The current pandemic as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak has not only played havoc by affecting the physical health of people worldwide, but has also caused a negative impact on mental health too. With the upsurge in the number of daily COVID-19 cases, mental health professionals have a challenging role to play in order to address psychological concerns which are probably affecting more persons than those experiencing physical issues. During this phase of the pandemic and also, in the post pandemic era, psychological approaches need to be executed for the mental wellbeing of people, few of which we have discussed concisely here. The psychodynamic approach would focus on attachment and childhood experiences, and how people use various defense mechanisms to avoid interpersonal conflicts. By bringing awareness of the unconscious factors that are at play, the therapist may help affected persons towards positive psychological growth (Marčinko et al., 2020). In case of a person-centered approach, the therapist’s unconditional positive regard and the process of self-actualization, would be of help in curbing the loneliness that have arisen due to the pandemic. Through strength, resilience and creativity, an individual can face these tough times (Inchausti et al., 2020). On a separate note, the existentialists would view this crisis due to COVID-19 as an opportunity for growth. As existentialists put it, isolation is to be accepted instead of being avoided because we all are alone. Friends, family, partners, and lovers cannot mask the fact that every human is truly alone to experience this world. Therefore, building intimacy need not be discouraged, but it’s limitations need to be accepted too. This pandemic has also caused many to question the meaning of life in general. Many people derive their meaning from the work they do. With the rise of unemployment and loneliness, life now seems to be meaningless. It has been explained that if an individual search for the meaning of life, he will not find it (Hillmann, 2004). Meaning emerges as one starts caring for others. If we focus too much on ourselves, we lose the true essence of life. Existentialism teaches us not to wait for the COVID-19 pandemic to go, instead, it teaches us to live in the uncertainties. By helping others through donating funds, delivering food and necessities, or by giving a friendly call, one can find a purpose of life in the times of crisis. Persons who are susceptible to emotional problems and those who encounter extreme levels of stress may find it difficult to address their cognitive errors, which could become a part of them due to the present situation. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is one approach where the therapist can help the patients identify their cognitive errors, automatic thoughts and maladaptive behaviours, and, eventually help them modify such thoughts and behaviours. CBT is a therapy with no time limit, but it works well with a short duration. In this approach, it is presumed that emotions and behaviors of persons are induced by their perception of events (Fenn and Byrne, 2013). Intervention processes during the COVID-19 pandemic based on CBT should focus on minimizing the impact of perceptions and information overload on the individual's mental health. Apart from these, tactics such as engaging in helpful behaviours, engaging in self-care, participating in pleasant events, problem solving, relaxation exercises, meditation and mindfulness could also be supportive to deal with psychological concerns during the pandemic and, in the post-pandemic era. With the advent of technology in mental health care, tele-psychotherapy methods can play a crucial role and support persons in need to reach out to their therapists even during restrictions such as lockdown and social distancing. The comfort and assurance a patient senses by linking with the persona of the therapist via tele psychotherapeutic practices would be undeniably much more than that gotten through the sheer eyes of the psychiatrist having to examine through the personal protective equipment (PPE) gear (Wind et al., 2020). Psychological preparedness must include various approaches to cater the needs of people suffering from mental health issues currently and post-COVID-19 pandemic. As the COVID-19 scenario unfolds, there is a need for mental health professionals to be adequately prepared. The range of psychological approaches discussed here could be applied to develop strategies for mental health support in the current phase as well as for the protracted enduring psychological effects of the pandemic. Financial disclosure None. Contributors All authors contributed equally. Previously published None. Declaration of Competing Interest None.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health

          In February 2020, Duan and Zhu (2020) stressed the need for a solid Chinese evidence-based mental health care system in times of public health emergencies such as the outbreak of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). That would enable treatment of people who suffer from mental health problems in relation to the epidemic. The WHO has meanwhile labelled the Coronavirus a pandemic, and it is now hitting Europe, the USA, and Australia hard as well. In an attempt to reduce the risk of infections, many mental health care providers in afflicted countries are currently closing their doors for patients who need ambulatory face-to-face therapy. They are simultaneously trying to replace some of these contacts with digital therapies. Most probably, European mental health care institutions have yet to experience the full impact of the coronavirus crisis. At the same time, the demand for mental health care among infected patients and their relatives is expected to rise (Blumenstyk, 2020). Levels of anxiety will increase, both through direct causes including fears of contamination, stress, grief, and depression triggered by exposure to the virus, and through influences from the consequences of the social and economic mayhem that is occurring on individual and societal levels. We expect that this “black swan” moment (Blumenstyk, 2020) - an unforeseen event that changes everything - will lead to a partly, though robust, shift in mental health care provision towards online prevention, treatment, and care in the near future. We also need to consider the role of psychological processes and fear that may cause further harm on top of the pandemic (Asmundson and Taylor, 2020). The obvious solution to continue mental health care within a pandemic is to provide mental health care at a ‘warm’ distance by video-conferencing psychotherapy and internet interventions. A systematic review showed that videoconferencing psychotherapy show promising results for anxiety and mood disorders (Berryhill et al., 2019), and the evidence-base for therapist-guided internet interventions is even stronger (Andersson, 2016). Yet, despite two decades of evidence-based e-mental health services, numerous barriers have stalled the overall implementation in routine care thus far (Vis et al., 2018; Tuerk et al., 2019). One of the most important barriers highlighted, however, has been that e-mental health has not been integrated as a normal part of routine care practice due to the lack of acceptance by health professionals themselves (Topooco et al., 2017). Myths on telehealth such as “the therapeutic alliance can only be established face-to-face” have dominated the field, in spite of research showing the opposite (Berger, 2017). In that sense, learning curves in the adoption of new e-mental health technologies by both patients and psychologists have progressed far more slowly than initially expected, thus tallying with the estimate that it takes on average16 years for a health care innovation to be implemented (Rogers et al., 2017). There are however exceptions in the world but progress is still slow. In the Netherlands and elsewhere, we are now witnessing a phenomenon whereby the outbreak of COVID-19 is hastening managers, ICT-staff, and clinicians to overcome all such barriers overnight, from a pragmatic standpoint seldom seen before. The virus seems a greater catalyst for the implementation of online therapy and e-health tools in routine practice than two decades of many brilliant, but failed, attempts in this domain (Mohr et al., 2018). After all, since predictions about COVID-19 are largely unclear as of yet, it is now time to create a longer-term solution to the problem of heterogeneous patient populations, such as those still active in the community and those that are house-bound or isolated in hospitals. Videoconferencing and internet interventions could therefore be very helpful in mental health care, as well as in physical care and can be easily upscaled to serve isolated regions and reach across borders. Thus, the “black swan virus” has already enabled wide-scale acceptance of videoconferencing by health professionals and patients alike – creating a win-win situation for both. We should stress that e-mental health applications hold value far beyond the provision of videoconferencing psychotherapy in the current situation of crisis. Countries hit by the Corona virus may also consider adopting a wider public e-mental health approach, which would focus additionally on prevention and on reaching people at risk for mental health disorders. In this respect, not only guided but also fully self-guided interventions, such as self-help apps or online therapeutic modules, could also be applied in settings and countries with scarce mental health resources (Christiani and Setiawan, 2018). We should also consider the need for treatment development (for the psychological problems caused by corona virus isolation), which is by far more rapid in the field of internet interventions than in traditional psychotherapy (Andersson et al., 2018). It is likely that the response to this emergency will be more than a temporary increase in online work (Blumenstyk, 2020). Once mental health care institutions have developed the capabilities of serving their patients via videoconferencing and other digital technologies, there is little reason for them to give these up, in view of the many advantages (Blumenstyk, 2020; Tuerk et al., 2019). This black swan should be a call for action by encouraging providers to move more rapidly towards blended care models (van der Vaart et al., 2014; Kooistra et al., 2019). Agility, flexibility, and resilience are essential skills for 21-st-century institutions, particularly when unforeseen disruptive viruses and devastating events driven by climate change are likely to be increasingly common (Blumenstyk, 2020). We urge practitioners to promptly start adopting e-mental health care applications, both as methods to continue their care to current patients in need and as interventions to cope with the imminent upsurge in mental health symptoms due to the coronavirus. Uncited reference Karyotaki et al., 2018
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The key principles of cognitive behavioural therapy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychological Intervention and COVID-19: What We Know So Far and What We Can Do

              The coronavirus COVID-19 and the global pandemic has already had a substantial disruptive impact on society, posing major challenges to the provision of mental health services in a time of crisis, and carrying the spectre of an increased burden to mental health, both in terms of existing psychiatric disorder, and emerging psychological distress from the pandemic. In this paper we provide a framework for understanding the key challenges for psychologically informed mental health care during and beyond the pandemic. We identify three groups that can benefit from psychological approaches to mental health, and/or interventions relating to COVID-19. These are (i) healthcare workers engaged in frontline response to the pandemic and their patients; (ii) individuals who will experience the emergence of new mental health distress as a function of being diagnosed with COVID-19, or losing family and loved ones to the illness, or the psychological effects of prolonged social distancing; and (iii) individuals with existing mental health conditions who are either diagnosed with COVID-19 or whose experience of social distancing exacerbates existing vulnerabilities. Drawing on existing literature and our own experience of adapting treatments to the crisis we suggest a number of salient points to consider in identifying risks and offering support to all three groups. We also offer a number of practical and technical considerations for working psychotherapeutically with existing patients where COVID-19 restrictions have forced a move to online or technologically mediated delivery of psychological interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian Journal of Psychiatry
                Elsevier B.V.
                1876-2018
                1876-2026
                18 June 2020
                October 2020
                18 June 2020
                : 53
                : 102221
                Affiliations
                [0005]Department of Psychiatry, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India
                [0010]PUC Minas, USF, Brazil
                [0015]Department of Psychology, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Samdur, Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India
                [0020]Department of Psychiatry, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. shijojj90@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S1876-2018(20)30333-6 102221
                10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102221
                7301828
                32570101
                9c3e452d-c6df-469d-85a7-d24da921f159
                © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 8 June 2020
                : 10 June 2020
                : 11 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article