ScienceOpen:
research and publishing network
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Search
Advanced search
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
Blog
About
5
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
1
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
3,812
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Article
: not found
How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
Author(s):
D Jackson
,
J Bowden
,
R Baker
Publication date:
2010
Read this article at
ScienceOpen
Bookmark
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
Point-of-Care Testing for HIV
Data availability:
ScienceOpen disciplines:
Statistics
,
Biostatistics
Comments
Comment on this article
Sign in to comment
Similar content
3,812
Some Items of Interest to Process R&D Chemists and Engineers as Selected by Trevor Laird and Stephen A. Hermitage
Authors:
Trevor Laird
,
Stephen Hermitage
Some Items of Interest to Process R&D Chemists and Engineers as Selected by Trevor Laird and Stephen A. Hermitage
Authors:
Johnson-Laird P. The Wason selection task: A meta-analysis
Authors:
M. Ragni
,
I. N Kola
See all similar
Cited by
1
A sensitivity analysis framework for the treatment effect measure used in the meta-analysis of comparative binary data from randomised controlled trials
Authors:
Dan Jackson
,
Rose Baker
,
Jack Bowden
See all cited by