16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Directed Interaction Between Monkey Premotor and Posterior Parietal Cortex During Motor-Goal Retrieval from Working Memory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Goal-directed behavior requires cognitive control of action, putatively by means of frontal-lobe impact on posterior brain areas. We investigated frontoparietal directed interaction (DI) in monkeys during memory-guided rule-based reaches, to test if DI supports motor-goal selection or working memory (WM) processes. We computed DI between the parietal reach region (PRR) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) with a Granger-causality measure of intracortical local field potentials (LFP). LFP mostly in the beta (12–32 Hz) and low-frequency ( f 10 Hz) ranges contributed to DI. During movement withholding, beta-band activity in PRR had a Granger-causal effect on PMd independent of WM content. Complementary, low-frequency PMd activity had a transient Granger-causing effect on PRR specifically during WM retrieval of spatial motor goals, while no DI was associated with preliminary motor-goal selection. Our results support the idea that premotor and posterior parietal cortices interact functionally to achieve cognitive control during goal-directed behavior, in particular, that frontal-to-parietal interaction occurs during retrieval of motor-goal information from spatial WM.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cellular basis of working memory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

              1. An oculomotor delayed-response task was used to examine the spatial memory functions of neurons in primate prefrontal cortex. Monkeys were trained to fixate a central spot during a brief presentation (0.5 s) of a peripheral cue and throughout a subsequent delay period (1-6 s), and then, upon the extinction of the fixation target, to make a saccadic eye movement to where the cue had been presented. Cues were usually presented in one of eight different locations separated by 45 degrees. This task thus requires monkeys to direct their gaze to the location of a remembered visual cue, controls the retinal coordinates of the visual cues, controls the monkey's oculomotor behavior during the delay period, and also allows precise measurement of the timing and direction of the relevant behavioral responses. 2. Recordings were obtained from 288 neurons in the prefrontal cortex within and surrounding the principal sulcus (PS) while monkeys performed this task. An additional 31 neurons in the frontal eye fields (FEF) region within and near the anterior bank of the arcuate sulcus were also studied. 3. Of the 288 PS neurons, 170 exhibited task-related activity during at least one phase of this task and, of these, 87 showed significant excitation or inhibition of activity during the delay period relative to activity during the intertrial interval. 4. Delay period activity was classified as directional for 79% of these 87 neurons in that significant responses only occurred following cues located over a certain range of visual field directions and were weak or absent for other cue directions. The remaining 21% were omnidirectional, i.e., showed comparable delay period activity for all visual field locations tested. Directional preferences, or lack thereof, were maintained across different delay intervals (1-6 s). 5. For 50 of the 87 PS neurons, activity during the delay period was significantly elevated above the neuron's spontaneous rate for at least one cue location; for the remaining 37 neurons only inhibitory delay period activity was seen. Nearly all (92%) neurons with excitatory delay period activity were directional and few (8%) were omnidirectional. Most (62%) neurons with purely inhibitory delay period activity were directional, but a substantial minority (38%) was omnidirectional. 6. Fifteen of the neurons with excitatory directional delay period activity also had significant inhibitory delay period activity for other cue directions. These inhibitory responses were usually strongest for, or centered about, cue directions roughly opposite those optimal for excitatory responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cereb Cortex
                Cereb. Cortex
                cercor
                Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)
                Oxford University Press
                1047-3211
                1460-2199
                May 2018
                22 February 2018
                22 February 2018
                : 28
                : 5
                : 1866-1881
                Affiliations
                [1 ]German Primate Center, Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
                [2 ]Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Göttingen, Germany
                [3 ]Faculty of Biology and Psychology, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Pablo Martínez-Vázquez, German Primate Center, Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. Email: pmvazquez@ 123456dpz.eu
                Article
                bhy035
                10.1093/cercor/bhy035
                5907360
                29481586
                9c49306f-03ec-4714-b70f-0f46140bd5e0
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 28 June 2017
                : 25 January 2018
                : 31 January 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: Federal Ministry for Education and Research
                Award ID: 01GQ0814
                Funded by: Bernstein Focus for Neurotechnology
                Award ID: 01GQ1005C
                Funded by: Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience
                Funded by: German Research Foundation (DFG, Germany)
                Award ID: SFB-889
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Neurology
                action selection,goal-directed behavior,granger causality,motor planning,working memory
                Neurology
                action selection, goal-directed behavior, granger causality, motor planning, working memory

                Comments

                Comment on this article