208
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    5
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The role of APOE4 in Alzheimer’s disease: strategies for future therapeutic interventions

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia affecting almost 50 million people worldwide. The ε4 allele of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is the strongest known genetic risk factor for late-onset AD cases, with homozygous APOE4 carriers being approximately 15-times more likely to develop the disease. With 25% of the population being APOE4 carriers, understanding the role of this allele in AD pathogenesis and pathophysiology is crucial. Though the exact mechanism by which ε4 allele increases the risk for AD is unknown, the processes mediated by APOE, including cholesterol transport, synapse formation, modulation of neurite outgrowth, synaptic plasticity, destabilization of microtubules, and β-amyloid clearance, suggest potential therapeutic targets. This review will summarize the impact of APOE on neurons and neuronal signaling, the interactions between APOE and AD pathology, and the association with memory decline. We will then describe current treatments targeting APOE4, complications associated with the current therapies, and suggestions for future areas of research and treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references118

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2018 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

          (2018)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy

            APOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer disease. ApoE4 increases brain amyloid-β pathology relative to other ApoE isoforms. However, whether APOE independently influences tau pathology, the other major proteinopathy of Alzheimer disease and other tauopathies, or tau-mediated neurodegeneration, is not clear. By generating P301S tau transgenic mice on either a human ApoE knock-in (KI) or ApoE knockout (KO) background, here we show that P301S/E4 mice have significantly higher tau levels in the brain and a greater extent of somatodendritic tau redistribution by three months of age compared with P301S/E2, P301S/E3, and P301S/EKO mice. By nine months of age, P301S mice with different ApoE genotypes display distinct phosphorylated tau protein (p-tau) staining patterns. P301S/E4 mice develop markedly more brain atrophy and neuroinflammation than P301S/E2 and P301S/E3 mice, whereas P301S/EKO mice are largely protected from these changes. In vitro, E4-expressing microglia exhibit higher innate immune reactivity after lipopolysaccharide treatment. Co-culturing P301S tau-expressing neurons with E4-expressing mixed glia results in a significantly higher level of tumour-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) secretion and markedly reduced neuronal viability compared with neuron/E2 and neuron/E3 co-cultures. Neurons co-cultured with EKO glia showed the greatest viability with the lowest level of secreted TNF-α. Treatment of P301S neurons with recombinant ApoE (E2, E3, E4) also leads to some neuronal damage and death compared with the absence of ApoE, with ApoE4 exacerbating the effect. In individuals with a sporadic primary tauopathy, the presence of an ε4 allele is associated with more severe regional neurodegeneration. In individuals who are positive for amyloid-β pathology with symptomatic Alzheimer disease who usually have tau pathology, ε4-carriers demonstrate greater rates of disease progression. Our results demonstrate that ApoE affects tau pathogenesis, neuroinflammation, and tau-mediated neurodegeneration independently of amyloid-β pathology. ApoE4 exerts a ‘toxic’ gain of function whereas the absence of ApoE is protective.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intranasal delivery of biologics to the central nervous system.

              Treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases is very difficult due to the blood-brain barrier's (BBB) ability to severely restrict entry of all but small, non-polar compounds. Intranasal administration is a non-invasive method of drug delivery which may bypass the BBB to allow therapeutic substances direct access to the CNS. Intranasal delivery of large molecular weight biologics such as proteins, gene vectors, and stem cells is a potentially useful strategy to treat a variety of diseases/disorders of the CNS including stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, and psychiatric disorders. Here we give an overview of relevant nasal anatomy and physiology and discuss the pathways and mechanisms likely involved in drug transport from the nasal epithelium to the CNS. Finally we review both pre-clinical and clinical studies involving intranasal delivery of biologics to the CNS. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuronal Signal
                Neuronal Signal
                ns
                Neuronal Signaling
                Portland Press Ltd.
                2059-6553
                June 2019
                18 April 2019
                : 3
                : 2
                : NS20180203
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Systems Neuroscience, Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc. (RFMH)/New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), New York, NY 10032, U.S.A.
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, U.S.A.
                [3 ]Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A.
                [4 ]Center for Neuroscience Initiative, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, U.S.A.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Miranda N. Reed ( reedmir@ 123456auburn.edu )
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8465-5594
                Article
                NS20180203
                10.1042/NS20180203
                7104324
                32269835
                9c763e27-26fd-47f5-866d-9377df581006
                © 2019 The Author(s).

                This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                : 05 November 2018
                : 25 March 2019
                : 27 March 2019
                : 08 April 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Categories
                Aging
                Molecular Bases of Health & Disease
                Neuroscience
                Review Articles

                apoe,alzheimer,amyloid,therapeutics,tau
                apoe, alzheimer, amyloid, therapeutics, tau

                Comments

                Comment on this article