179
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
0
shares
• Record: found
• Abstract: found
• Article: found
Is Open Access

# Stercoral Perforation of the Colon during Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

### Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
Bookmark
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

### Abstract

Stercoral perforation of the colon, though rare, is associated with high mortality. Review of the literature identified only three prior cases reported during pregnancy. We report a case on a multiparous female presenting at 31 weeks of gestation with acute abdominal pain. Computed tomography suggested a sigmoid colon perforation. An urgent exploratory laparotomy was performed where feculent peritonitis and a stercoral perforation of the sigmoid colon was confirmed. A cesarean delivery and sigmoid colectomy with descending end colostomy was performed. While the newborn had an uncomplicated course, the mother developed an intra-abdominal abscess requiring operative management.

### Most cited references13

• Record: found
• Abstract: found
• Article: not found

### Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources.

(1998)
In patients with clinically suspected appendicitis, computed tomography (CT) is diagnostically accurate. However, the effect of routine CT of the appendix on the treatment of such patients and the use of hospital resources is unknown. We performed appendiceal CT on 100 consecutive patients in the emergency department who, on the basis of history, physical examination, and laboratory results, were to be hospitalized for observation for suspected appendicitis or for urgent appendectomy. Outcomes were determined at surgery and by pathological examination in 59 patients, and by clinical follow-up two months later in 41 patients. Treatment plans made before CT were compared with the patients' actual treatment. We also determined the costs of surgery that revealed no appendicitis (from data on 61 patients), one day of observation in the hospital (from data on 350 patient-days in patients with suspected appendicitis), and appendiceal CT (from data on all pelvic CT examinations in 1996). Fifty-three patients had appendicitis, and 47 did not. The interpretations of the appendiceal CT scans were 98 percent accurate. The results of CT led to changes in the treatment of 59 patients. These changes resulted in the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients, admission to the hospital for observation in 18 patients, admission to the hospital for observation before necessary appendectomy in 21 patients, and admission to the hospital for observation before the diagnosis of other conditions by CT in 11 patients. The effects of performing appendiceal CT on the use of hospital resources included the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients (for a savings of $47,281) and the prevention of unnecessary hospital admission for 50 patient-days (for a savings of$20,250). After the cost of 100 appendiceal CT studies ($22,800) was subtracted, the overall savings was$447 per patient. Routine appendiceal CT performed in patients who present with suspected appendicitis improves patient care and reduces the use of hospital resources.
Bookmark
• Record: found
• Abstract: not found
• Article: not found

### ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy.

(2004)
Bookmark
• Record: found
• Abstract: found
• Article: not found

### Use of accurate diagnostic criteria may increase incidence of stercoral perforation of the colon.

(2000)
Stercoral perforation of the colon is reported to be a rare disease with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of stercoral perforation of the colon, to define diagnostic criteria for stercoral perforation of the colon, and to analyze the patient outcome in a university hospital gastrointestinal surgery unit. From November 1993 until November 1998 all surgically treated patients with a colorectal disease were prospectively recorded in a computerized database. Diagnosis of stercoral perforation of the colon was made if 1) the colonic perforation was round or ovoid, exceeded 1 cm in diameter, and lay antimesenteric; 2) fecalomas were present within the colon, protruding through the perforation site or lying within the abdominal cavity; and 3) pressure necrosis or ulcer and chronic inflammatory reaction around the perforation site were present microscopically. Any additional colon pathology led to exclusion from the diagnosis of stercoral perforation of the colon. Using the same criteria, 81 cases in the literature were found to qualify and were further analyzed. In a five-year period 1,295 patients underwent colorectal interventions through laparotomy. A total of 566 (44 percent) cases were emergencies, 220 (17 percent) of these caused by colonic perforation. Seven patients had stercoral perforation of the colon. The incidence of stercoral perforation of the colon was 0.5 percent of all surgical colorectal procedures through laparotomy, 1.2 percent of all emergency colorectal procedures, and 3.2 percent of all colonic perforations. The mean age of the patients was 59 (median, 64; range, 22-85) years. All perforations were situated in the left hemicolon or upper rectum. The round or ovoid perforation had a mean diameter of 3.6 cm. Fecalomas were present in all patients and protruded from the perforation site or were found within the free abdominal cavity in three of them. Generalized stercoral peritonitis was a constant finding. Using a colonic resection without immediate restoration of continuity, an extensive intraoperative lavage, and antibiotics, there was no in-hospital mortality. Analysis of the reports in the literature revealed additionally that 28 percent of patients with stercoral perforation of the colon have multiple stercoral ulcers in the colon and that substantial mortality is encountered if only minor surgical procedures of treatment are used. The incidence of stercoral perforation of the colon seemed to have been underestimated. The reason for this might be the lack of defined diagnostic criteria for this disease. Low mortality is obtained by early surgical eradication of the affected part of the colon, including all stercoral ulcers, and by aggressive therapy for peritonitis.
Bookmark

### Author and article information

###### Journal
AJP Rep
AJP Rep
10.1055/s-00000169
AJP Reports
Thieme Medical Publishers (333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. )
2157-6998
2157-7005
04 March 2015
April 2015
: 5
: 1
: e25-e29
###### Affiliations
[1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
[2 ]Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
[3 ]Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
###### Author notes
Address for correspondence Anthony B. Costales, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine 6431 Fannin Street, Suite 3.214, Houston, TX 77030 anthony.b.costales@ 123456uth.tmc.edu
###### Article
140035
10.1055/s-0034-1544105
4502617
© Thieme Medical Publishers
###### Categories
Article