9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Root Reinforcement Improved Performance, Productivity, and Grain Bioactive Quality of Field-Droughted Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Modern agriculture is facing multiple and complex challenges and has to produce more food and fiber to feed a growing population. Increasingly volatile weather and more extreme events such as droughts can reduce crop productivity. This implies the need for significant increases in production and the adoption of more efficient and sustainable production methods and adaptation to climate change. A new technological and environment-friendly management technique to improve the tolerance of quinoa grown to maturity is proposed using native microbial biostimulants (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; AMF) alone, in the consortium, or in combination with compost (Comp) as an organic matter source under two water treatments (normal irrigation and drought stress (DS)). Compared with controls, growth, grain yield, and all physiological traits under DS were significantly decreased while hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, and antioxidative enzymatic functions were significantly increased. Under DS, biofertilizer application reverted physiological activities to normal levels and potentially strengthened quinoa’s adaptability to water shortage as compared to untreated plants. The dual combination yielded a 97% improvement in grain dry weight. Moreover, the effectiveness of microbial and compost biostimulants as a biological tool improves grain quality and limits soil degradation under DS. Elemental concentrations, particularly macronutrients, antioxidant potential (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity), and bioactive compounds (phenol and flavonoid content), were accumulated at higher levels in biofertilizer-treated quinoa grain than in untreated controls. The effects of AMF + Comp on post-harvest soil fertility traits were the most positive, with significant increases in total phosphorus (47%) and organic matter (200%) content under drought conditions. Taken together, our data demonstrate that drought stress strongly influences the physiological traits, yield, and quality of quinoa. Microbial and compost biostimulation could be an effective alternative to ensure greater recovery capability, thereby maintaining relatively high levels of grain production. Our study shows that aboveground stress responses in quinoa can be modulated by signals from the microbial/compost-treated root. Further, quinoa grains are generally of higher nutritive quality when amended and inoculated with AMF as compared to non-inoculated and compost-free plants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references137

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants.

            Various abiotic stresses lead to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants which are highly reactive and toxic and cause damage to proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and DNA which ultimately results in oxidative stress. The ROS comprises both free radical (O(2)(-), superoxide radicals; OH, hydroxyl radical; HO(2), perhydroxy radical and RO, alkoxy radicals) and non-radical (molecular) forms (H(2)O(2), hydrogen peroxide and (1)O(2), singlet oxygen). In chloroplasts, photosystem I and II (PSI and PSII) are the major sites for the production of (1)O(2) and O(2)(-). In mitochondria, complex I, ubiquinone and complex III of electron transport chain (ETC) are the major sites for the generation of O(2)(-). The antioxidant defense machinery protects plants against oxidative stress damages. Plants possess very efficient enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; glutathione reductase, GR; monodehydroascorbate reductase, MDHAR; dehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; glutathione peroxidase, GPX; guaicol peroxidase, GOPX and glutathione-S- transferase, GST) and non-enzymatic (ascorbic acid, ASH; glutathione, GSH; phenolic compounds, alkaloids, non-protein amino acids and α-tocopherols) antioxidant defense systems which work in concert to control the cascades of uncontrolled oxidation and protect plant cells from oxidative damage by scavenging of ROS. ROS also influence the expression of a number of genes and therefore control the many processes like growth, cell cycle, programmed cell death (PCD), abiotic stress responses, pathogen defense, systemic signaling and development. In this review, we describe the biochemistry of ROS and their production sites, and ROS scavenging antioxidant defense machinery. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                18 March 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 860484
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center of Agrobiotechnology and Bioengineering, Research Unit Labelled CNRST (Centre AgroBiotech-URL-CNRST-05), Physiology of Abiotic Stresses Team, Cadi Ayyad University , Marrakesh, Morocco
                [2] 2Laboratory of Agro-Food, Biotechnologies and Valorization of Plant Bioresources (AGROBIOVAL), Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University , Marrakesh, Morocco
                [3] 3Laboratoire Mixte Tuniso-Marocain (LMTM) de Physiologie et Biotechnologie Végétales et Changements Climatiques LPBV2C , Tunis, Tunisia
                [4] 4Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Niigata University , Niigata, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Youssef Rouphael, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

                Reviewed by: Yousef Sohrabi, University of Kurdistan, Iran; Arafat Abdel Hamed Abdel Latef, South Valley University, Egypt

                *Correspondence: Marouane Baslam, mbaslam@ 123456gs.niigata-u.ac.jp
                Abdelilah Meddich, a.meddich@ 123456uca.ma

                This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2022.860484
                8971987
                35371170
                9c9e7d2c-b07f-49f4-ab6d-5ab59ac63f18
                Copyright © 2022 Toubali, Ait-El-Mokhtar, Boutasknit, Anli, Ait-Rahou, Benaffari, Ben-Ahmed, Mitsui, Baslam and Meddich.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 January 2022
                : 28 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 5, Equations: 4, References: 141, Pages: 20, Words: 16071
                Funding
                Funded by: European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
                Award ID: N862555
                Funded by: JSPS KAKENHI
                Award ID: 20K15425
                Funded by: Tuniso-Moroccan Mixed Laboratories (LMTM) of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology and Climate Change
                Funded by: Niigata University , doi 10.13039/100012833;
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                biostimulants,root-shoot-grain circuit,seed quality,drought tolerance,antioxidants,pseudocereal,soil health,endogenous mycorrhiza

                Comments

                Comment on this article