71
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives To evaluate the effect of training primary care health professionals in behaviour change counselling on the proportion of patients self reporting change in four risk behaviours (smoking, alcohol use, exercise, and healthy eating).

          Design Cluster randomised trial with general practices as the unit of randomisation.

          Setting General practices in Wales.

          Participants 53 general practitioners and practice nurses from 27 general practices (one each at all but one practice) recruited 1827 patients who screened positive for at least one risky behaviour.

          Intervention Behaviour change counselling was developed from motivational interviewing to enable clinicians to enhance patients’ motivation to change health related behaviour. Clinicians were trained using a blended learning programme called Talking Lifestyles.

          Main outcome measures Proportion of patients who reported making beneficial changes in at least one of the four risky behaviours at three months.

          Results 1308 patients from 13 intervention and 1496 from 14 control practices were approached: 76% and 72% respectively agreed to participate, with 831 (84%) and 996 (92%) respectively screening eligible for an intervention. There was no effect on the primary outcome (beneficial change in behaviour) at three months (362 (44%) v 404 (41%), odds ratio 1.12 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.39)) or on biochemical or biometric measures at 12 months. More patients who had consulted with trained clinicians recalled consultation discussion about a health behaviour (724/795 (91%) v 531/966 (55%), odds ratio 12.44 (5.85 to 26.46)) and intended to change (599/831 (72%) v 491/996 (49%), odds ratio 2.88 (2.05 to 4.05)). More intervention practice patients reported making an attempt to change (328 (39%) v 317 (32%), odds ratio 1.40 (1.15 to 1.70)), a sustained behaviour change at three months (288 (35%) v 280 (28%), odds ratio 1.36 (1.11 to 1.65)), and reported slightly greater improvements in healthy eating at three and 12 months, plus improved activity at 12 months. Training cost £1597 per practice.

          Discussion Training primary care clinicians in behaviour change counselling using a brief blended learning programme did not increase patients reported beneficial behaviour change at three months or improve biometric and a biochemical measure at 12 months, but it did increase patients’ recollection of discussing behaviour change with their clinicians, intentions to change, attempts to change, and perceptions of having made a lasting change at three months. Enduring behaviour change and improvements in biometric measures are unlikely after a single routine consultation with a clinician trained in behaviour change counselling without additional intervention.

          Trial registration ISRCTN 22495456

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

          How people intentionally change addictive behaviors with and without treatment is not well understood by behavioral scientists. This article summarizes research on self-initiated and professionally facilitated change of addictive behaviors using the key trans-theoretical constructs of stages and processes of change. Modification of addictive behaviors involves progression through five stages--pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance--and individuals typically recycle through these stages several times before termination of the addiction. Multiple studies provide strong support for these stages as well as for a finite and common set of change processes used to progress through the stages. Research to date supports a trans-theoretical model of change that systematically integrates the stages with processes of change from diverse theories of psychotherapy.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.

            The widely disseminated clinical method of motivational interviewing (MI) arose through a convergence of science and practice. Beyond a large base of clinical trials, advances have been made toward "looking under the hood" of MI to understand the underlying mechanisms by which it affects behavior change. Such specification of outcome-relevant aspects of practice is vital to theory development and can inform both treatment delivery and clinical training. An emergent theory of MI is proposed that emphasizes two specific active components: a relational component focused on empathy and the interpersonal spirit of MI, and a technical component involving the differential evocation and reinforcement of client change talk. A resulting causal chain model links therapist training, therapist and client responses during treatment sessions, and posttreatment outcomes.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing.

              The Evaluating Methods for Motivational Enhancement Education trial evaluated methods for learning motivational interviewing (MI). Licensed substance abuse professionals (N = 140) were randomized to 5 training conditions: (a) clinical workshop only; (b) workshop plus practice feedback; (c) workshop plus individual coaching sessions; (d) workshop, feedback, and coaching; or (e) a waiting list control group of self-guided training. Audiotaped practice samples were analyzed at baseline, posttraining, and 4, 8, and 12 months later. Relative to controls, the 4 trained groups showed larger gains in proficiency. Coaching and/or feedback also increased posttraining proficiency. After delayed training, the waiting list group showed modest gains in proficiency. Posttraining proficiency was generally well maintained throughout follow-up. Clinician self-reports of MI skillfulness were unrelated to proficiency levels in observed practice. Copyright 2004 APA.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: professor of primary care medicine
                Role: senior research fellow
                Role: professor of statistics
                Role: professor
                Role: statistician
                Role: senior lecturer in health psychology
                Role: senior lecturer in behaviour change
                Role: professor of public health improvement
                Role: research associate
                Role: senior research fellow
                Role: professor
                Role: professor
                Role: senior lecturer
                Role: professor of health care communication
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                bmj
                BMJ : British Medical Journal
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2013
                2013
                19 March 2013
                : 346
                : f1191
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
                [2 ]South East Wales Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University
                [3 ]Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sport and Science, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK
                [4 ]Centre for Health Psychology, Faculty of Sciences, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent ST4 2DE, UK
                [5 ]Cardiff Institute of Society and Health, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University
                [6 ]Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9HS, UK
                [7 ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cardiff University
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: C C Butler ButlerCC@ 123456Cardiff.ac.uk
                Article
                butc007840
                10.1136/bmj.f1191
                3601942
                23512758
                9caa0fe0-b17f-49b1-b558-7becfb25bb1a
                © Butler et al 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 15 February 2013
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log