9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seria o YouTube uma fonte confiável de informação sobre clareamento dental no Brasil? Translated title: Would YouTube a reliable source of information about dental bleaching in Brazil?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumo Introdução O clareamento dental é um procedimento amplamente realizado, levando a uma procura de informação pelos pacientes, sendo que uma dessas fontes são os vídeos do YouTube. Objetivo: Avaliar a qualidade das informações contidas nos vídeos do YouTube sobre clareamento dental no Brasil. Material e método Uma busca no YouTube foi realizada com a frase “clareamento dental”. Os primeiros 100 vídeos foram selecionados e visualizados na íntegra por dois examinadores, e parâmetros gerais foram registrados. Para avaliar a qualidade das informações, duas análises foram realizadas, avaliando a utilidade e a confiabilidade das informações. O teste de Mann-Whitney foi utilizado para avaliar e comparar a qualidade das informações. Resultado Dos 100 vídeos selecionados, 22 foram excluídos por não se adequarem aos critérios de seleção, restando 78 vídeos. Sobre a utilidade dos vídeos, 65,4% foram classificados como não úteis, 26,9% pouco úteis, 6,4% moderadamente úteis e apenas 1,3% muito útil. Sobre a confiabilidade dos vídeos, 94% não utilizaram fontes confiáveis de informação e 69% das informações não se apresentaram equilibradas e imparciais. Por outro lado, 60% dos vídeos exibiram informações claras e objetivas. Conclusão Atualmente, o YouTube não é uma fonte adequada de informações para pacientes sobre clareamento dental no Brasil. Sobre a qualidade dos vídeos, a maioria não se apresentou como satisfatória para os critérios de confiabilidade e utilidade. Os dentistas são a melhor fonte de conteúdo para clareamento dental. Entretanto os vídeos mais populares são de leigos e normalmente abordam receitas caseiras de clareamento dental.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Introduction Dental Bleaching is a widely procedure in dental practice, conducting patients to search for information and one of these sources of information it is videos from YouTube. Objective: Evaluate quality of information in videos from YouTube about dental bleaching in Brazil. Material and method: YouTube search for “dental bleaching” was performed. Theses videos are watched in full and categorized for two examinators. Reliability and usefulness were used to value the quality of information. Mann-Whitney test was used in statical analysis. Result The first 100 videos were examined for exclusion criteria and 22 were excluded, yielding 78 videos. About Usefulness of videos 65,4% were classified as non useful, 26,9% little useful, 6,4% moderately useful and just 1,3% as very useful. About reliability of videos 94% non used reliable sources of information, 69% of information was not balanced and impartial. However 60% of videos showed clear and objective information. Conclusion Actually YouTube was not a appropriate of information for patients about dental bleaching in Brazil. About quality of the videos, majority was not satisfactory for useful and reliability criteria. Dentists are the better source of information about dental bleaching, however most popular videos were from independent users e normally approaching homemade techniques of bleaching.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic.

          The ongoing H1N1 influenza pandemic has created a significant amount of health concern. Adequate dissemination of correct information about H1N1 influenza could help in decreasing the disease spread and associated anxiety in the population. This study aims to examine the effective use of the popular Internet video site YouTube as an information source during the initial phase of the H1N1 outbreak. YouTube was searched on June 26, 2009, using the keywords swine flu, H1N1 influenza, and influenza for videos uploaded in the past 3 months containing relevant information about the disease. The videos were classified as useful, misleading, or as news updates based on the kind of information contained. Total viewership, number of days since upload, total duration of videos, and source of upload were noted. A total of 142 videos had relevant information about H1N1 influenza. In all, 61.3% of videos had useful information about the disease, whereas 23% were misleading. Total viewership share of useful videos was 70.5%, whereas that of misleading videos was 17.5%, with no significant difference in viewership/day. The CDC contributed about 12% of the useful videos, with a significant viewership share of 47%. No significant differences were seen in viewership/day for useful videos based on the kind of information they contained. YouTube has a substantial amount of useful information about H1N1 influenza. A source-based preference is seen among the viewers, and CDC-uploaded videos are being used in an increasing proportion as a source of authentic information about the disease. Copyright (c) 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            YouTube as source of prostate cancer information.

            Patients can search the Internet for prostate cancer information, and YouTube is a popular Web site that they may consult. We analyzed the prostate cancer videos on YouTube for information content and the presence of bias. YouTube was searched for videos about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, radiotherapy, and surgery for prostate cancer. The included videos were in English and <10 minutes long. Two physician viewers watched each video and assigned a score for information content (excellent, fair, poor) and bias (for, against, neutral, or balanced). A third viewer arbitrated any discrepancies. The kappa statistic was used to measure interobserver variability, and Pearson's test was used to assess correlation. A total of 14 PSA videos, 5 radiotherapy videos, and 32 surgery videos were analyzed. The PSA testing videos averaged 1480 +/- 2196 views and 146 +/- 174 s long and had an average viewer rating of 3.1 +/- 2.1 (viewer rating scale 0-5). The surgery videos averaged 2044 +/- 3740 views and 172 +/- 122 s long and had an average viewer rating of scored 3 +/- 2.2. The radiotherapy videos averaged 287 +/- 255 views and 97 +/- 45 s long and had a score of 1.8 +/- 2.5. The information content was fair or poor for 73% of all videos. The bias for surgery, radiotherapy, or PSA testing was present in 69% of videos; 0% of videos were biased against treatment or PSA testing. The interobserver variability was well above than expected by chance alone. The results of our study have shown that although some videos are robust sources of information, given the preponderance of modest and unbalanced information among reviewed videos, YouTube is an inadequate source of prostate cancer information for patients. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease.

              To look into effective use of popular Internet site YouTube as an information source on kidney stone disease. Urolithiasis is among the most common urological conditions, accounting for significant morbidity, however adequate education regarding simple lifestyle modifications and early recognition of symptoms can reduce recurrence and visits to emergency department. YouTube was searched using Keywords "nephrolithiasis"; "renal calculi"; "renal stones"; and "kidney stones" for videos uploaded containing relevant information about the disease. Only videos in English were included. Two physician viewers watched each video and classified them as useful; misleading; or personal experiences. The kappa-statistic was used to measure inter-observer variability. Total-viewership; duration; rating; days since upload; source; and information content were noted One-hundred ninety-nine videos had relevant information about nephrolithiasis; 58.3% of the videos had useful information and 18.1% were misleading. Useful videos had 47.2% of total viewership (i.e. total no. of views) share, whereas misleading videos had 2.8%, with statistically significant difference in viewership/day and rating among useful videos vs misleading videos. Universities'channel videos provided the best overall information coverage among the useful videos (prevention = 100%, symptoms = 80%, treatments = 60%, other information = 80%). No significant difference was seen in viewership/day or rating of useful videos based on the kind of information they contained. YouTube has a substantial amount of information on urolithiasis. Therefore, consumer-generated outlets such as YouTube have significant potential to sway individuals' attitudes both for and against the right choice. In view of this, authoritative videos by trusted sources should be posted for dissemination of reliable information. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rounesp
                Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
                Rev. odontol. UNESP
                Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (Araraquara, SP, Brazil )
                0101-1774
                1807-2577
                2020
                : 49
                : e20200036
                Affiliations
                [01] Florianópolis Santa Catarina orgnameUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina orgdiv1Departamento de Odontologia Brazil
                Article
                S1807-25772020000100408 S1807-2577(20)04900000408
                10.1590/1807-2577.03620
                9cb5c5c0-d0b1-456f-8fbf-41724c8cbbe5

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 15 June 2020
                : 22 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Artigos Originais

                Clareamento dental,odontologia,Dental bleaching,mídias sociais,social media,dentistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article