109
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    20
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Towards a Cure for BCI Illiteracy

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 2
      Brain Topography
      Springer US
      Co-adaptive learning, Brain–computer interfaces, BCI illiteracy problem

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) allow a user to control a computer application by brain activity as acquired, e.g., by EEG. One of the biggest challenges in BCI research is to understand and solve the problem of “BCI Illiteracy”, which is that BCI control does not work for a non-negligible portion of users (estimated 15 to 30%). Here, we investigate the illiteracy problem in BCI systems which are based on the modulation of sensorimotor rhythms. In this paper, a sophisticated adaptation scheme is presented which guides the user from an initial subject-independent classifier that operates on simple features to a subject-optimized state-of-the-art classifier within one session while the user interacts the whole time with the same feedback application. While initial runs use supervised adaptation methods for robust co-adaptive learning of user and machine, final runs use unsupervised adaptation and therefore provide an unbiased measure of BCI performance. Using this approach, which does not involve any offline calibration measurement, good performance was obtained by good BCI participants (also one novice) after 3–6 min of adaptation. More importantly, the use of machine learning techniques allowed users who were unable to achieve successful feedback before to gain significant control over the BCI system. In particular, one participant had no peak of the sensory motor idle rhythm in the beginning of the experiment, but could develop such peak during the course of the session (and use voluntary modulation of its amplitude to control the feedback application).

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The non-invasive Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects.

          Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems establish a direct communication channel from the brain to an output device. These systems use brain signals recorded from the scalp, the surface of the cortex, or from inside the brain to enable users to control a variety of applications. BCI systems that bypass conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles can provide novel control options for paralyzed patients. One classical approach to establish EEG-based control is to set up a system that is controlled by a specific EEG feature which is known to be susceptible to conditioning and to let the subjects learn the voluntary control of that feature. In contrast, the Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI) uses well established motor competencies of its users and a machine learning approach to extract subject-specific patterns from high-dimensional features optimized for detecting the user's intent. Thus the long subject training is replaced by a short calibration measurement (20 min) and machine learning (1 min). We report results from a study in which 10 subjects, who had no or little experience with BCI feedback, controlled computer applications by voluntary imagination of limb movements: these intentions led to modulations of spontaneous brain activity specifically, somatotopically matched sensorimotor 7-30 Hz rhythms were diminished over pericentral cortices. The peak information transfer rate was above 35 bits per minute (bpm) for 3 subjects, above 23 bpm for two, and above 12 bpm for 3 subjects, while one subject could achieve no BCI control. Compared to other BCI systems which need longer subject training to achieve comparable results, we propose that the key to quick efficiency in the BBCI system is its flexibility due to complex but physiologically meaningful features and its adaptivity which respects the enormous inter-subject variability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in.

              With the increasing efficiency of life-support systems and better intensive care, more patients survive severe injuries of the brain and spinal cord. Many of these patients experience locked-in syndrome: The active mind is locked in a paralyzed body. Consequently, communication is extremely restricted or impossible. A muscle-independent communication channel overcomes this problem and is realized through a brain-computer interface, a direct connection between brain and computer. The number of technically elaborated brain-computer interfaces is in contrast with the number of systems used in the daily life of locked-in patients. It is hypothesized that a profound knowledge and consideration of psychological principles are necessary to make brain-computer interfaces feasible for locked-in patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                vidcar@cs.tu-berlin.de
                blanker@cs.tu-berlin.de
                Journal
                Brain Topogr
                Brain Topography
                Springer US (Boston )
                0896-0267
                1573-6792
                28 November 2009
                28 November 2009
                June 2010
                : 23
                : 2
                : 194-198
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Machine Learning Dp, Berlin Institute of Technology, Franklinstr. 28/29, 10587 Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]IDA Group, Fraunhofer FIRST, Kekulestr. 7, 12489 Berlin, Germany
                Article
                121
                10.1007/s10548-009-0121-6
                2874052
                19946737
                9cbdfaea-802a-44de-a324-1d26b6a7b1fc
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 24 August 2009
                : 11 November 2009
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

                Neurology
                bci illiteracy problem,brain–computer interfaces,co-adaptive learning
                Neurology
                bci illiteracy problem, brain–computer interfaces, co-adaptive learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article