34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring the high-resolution mapping of gender-disaggregated development indicators

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Improved understanding of geographical variation and inequity in health status, wealth and access to resources within countries is increasingly being recognized as central to meeting development goals. Development and health indicators assessed at national or subnational scale can often conceal important inequities, with the rural poor often least well represented. The ability to target limited resources is fundamental, especially in an international context where funding for health and development comes under pressure. This has recently prompted the exploration of the potential of spatial interpolation methods based on geolocated clusters from national household survey data for the high-resolution mapping of features such as population age structures, vaccination coverage and access to sanitation. It remains unclear, however, how predictable these different factors are across different settings, variables and between demographic groups. Here we test the accuracy of spatial interpolation methods in producing gender-disaggregated high-resolution maps of the rates of literacy, stunting and the use of modern contraceptive methods from a combination of geolocated demographic and health surveys cluster data and geospatial covariates. Bayesian geostatistical and machine learning modelling methods were tested across four low-income countries and varying gridded environmental and socio-economic covariate datasets to build 1×1 km spatial resolution maps with uncertainty estimates. Results show the potential of the approach in producing high-resolution maps of key gender-disaggregated socio-economic indicators, with explained variance through cross-validation being as high as 74–75% for female literacy in Nigeria and Kenya, and in the 50–70% range for many other variables. However, substantial variations by both country and variable were seen, with many variables showing poor mapping accuracies in the range of 2–30% explained variance using both geostatistical and machine learning approaches. The analyses offer a robust basis for the construction of timely maps with levels of detail that support geographically stratified decision-making and the monitoring of progress towards development goals. However, the great variability in results between countries and variables highlights the challenges in applying these interpolation methods universally across multiple countries, and the importance of validation and quantifying uncertainty if this is undertaken.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data.

          I evaluated the predictive ability of statistical models obtained by applying seven methods of variable selection to 12 ecological and environmental data sets. Cross-validation, involving repeated splits of each data set into training and validation subsets, was used to obtain honest estimates of predictive ability that could be fairly compared among methods. There was surprisingly little difference in predictive ability among five methods based on multiple linear regression. Stepwise methods performed similarly to exhaustive algorithms for subset selection, and the choice of criterion for comparing models (Akaike's information criterion, Schwarz's Bayesian information criterion or F statistics) had little effect on predictive ability. For most of the data sets, two methods based on regression trees yielded models with substantially lower predictive ability. I argue that there is no 'best' method of variable selection and that any of the regression-based approaches discussed here is capable of yielding useful predictive models.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Statistical Methods for Geography

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J R Soc Interface
                J R Soc Interface
                RSIF
                royinterface
                Journal of the Royal Society Interface
                The Royal Society
                1742-5689
                1742-5662
                April 2017
                5 April 2017
                5 April 2017
                : 14
                : 129
                : 20160825
                Affiliations
                [1 ]WorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                [2 ]Flowminder Foundation , Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University , Loughborough, UK
                [4 ]Stockholm School of Economics , Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3722725.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-4571
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-1195
                Article
                rsif20160825
                10.1098/rsif.2016.0825
                5414904
                28381641
                9d0ab507-36af-4bd0-a0c3-638f5a4dc4cc
                © 2017 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 October 2016
                : 13 March 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440;
                Award ID: 106866/Z/15/Z
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865;
                Award ID: 1032350
                Award ID: OPP1134076
                Award ID: OPP1106427
                Award ID: OPP1094793
                Funded by: UN Foundation;
                Categories
                1004
                20
                Life Sciences–Mathematics interface
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                April, 2017

                Life sciences
                geo-statistics,development indicators,mapping,geographic information system
                Life sciences
                geo-statistics, development indicators, mapping, geographic information system

                Comments

                Comment on this article