26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Hypotheses about the P3 component of the event-related EEG potential have usually assumed that P3b reflects some processing independent from organizing the response. In contrast, the notion that P3b is related to a decision process implies some mediating function between stimulus and response. If P3b does indeed reflect the link between perceptual processing and response preparation (1) amplitudes should be as large in response-locked averages as in stimulus-locked averages, (2) this should be true independent of response speed, for separate subaverages of slow and fast responses, and (3) latencies should vary across response speed both in stimulus-locked and in response-locked averages. These hypotheses were tested in data evoked by visual and auditory stimuli in choice-response tasks. All three predictions were confirmed. In contrast to this balanced relation to perception and responding, fronto-central P3 with auditory stimuli was stimulus-related and, for comparison, the peak amplitudes of both the response-force and of the lateralized readiness potential were response-related. We conclude that P3b reflects a process that mediates between perceptual analysis and response initiation, possibly monitoring whether the decision to classify some stimulus is appropriately transformed into action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory.

            Recent neurobiological studies have begun to reveal the cognitive and neural coding mechanisms that underlie declarative memory--our ability to recollect everyday events and factual knowledge. These studies indicate that the critical circuitry involves bidirectional connections between the neocortex, the parahippocampal region and the hippocampus. Each of these areas makes a unique contribution to memory processing. Widespread high-order neocortical areas provide dedicated processors for perceptual, motor or cognitive information that is influenced by other components of the system. The parahippocampal region mediates convergence of this information and extends the persistence of neocortical memory representations. The hippocampus encodes the sequences of places and events that compose episodic memories, and links them together through their common elements. Here I describe how these mechanisms work together to create and re-create fully networked representations of previous experiences and knowledge about the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.

              Two distinct late-positive components of the scalp-recorded auditory evoked potential were identified which differed in their latency, scalp topography and psychological correlates. The earlier component, called "P3a" (latency about 240 msec), was elicited by infrequent, unpredictable shifts of either intensity or frequency in a train of tone pips whether the subject was ignoring (reading a book) or attending to the tones (counting). The later component, called "P3a" (mean latency about 350 msec), occurred only when the subject was actively attending to the tones; it was evoked by the infrequent, unpredictable stimulus shifts, regardless of whether the subject was counting that stimulus or the more frequently occurring stimulus. Both of these distinct psychophysiological entities have previously been refered to as the "P3" or "P300" in the literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                jop
                Journal of Psychophysiology
                An International Journal
                Hogrefe Publishing
                0269-8803
                January 2005
                : 19
                : 3
                : 165-181
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Germany
                [ 2 ] Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland
                [ 3 ] Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
                Author notes
                Verleger Rolf, Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany, +49 451 500-2916, +49 451 500-2489, rolf.verleger@ 123456neuro.uni-luebeck.de
                Article
                jop1903165
                10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.165
                9d0eac36-b3e1-41c1-9379-ed270425c5d2
                Copyright @ 2005
                History
                : 29 December 2004
                Categories
                Articles

                Psychology,Anatomy & Physiology,Neurosciences
                P300,decision,response,perception,monitoring,response speed
                Psychology, Anatomy & Physiology, Neurosciences
                P300, decision, response, perception, monitoring, response speed

                Comments

                Comment on this article