7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation and optimisation of a touchscreen progressive ratio test of motivation in male rats

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale

          Across species, effort-related motivation can be assessed by testing behaviour under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement. However, to date, PR tasks for rodents have been available using traditional operant response systems only.

          Objectives

          Touchscreen operant response systems allow the assessment of behaviour in laboratory rodents, using tasks that share high face validity with the computerised assessments used in humans. Here, we sought to optimise a rat touchscreen variant of PR and validate it by assessing the effects of a number of manipulations known to affect PR performance in non-touchscreen paradigms.

          Methods

          Separate groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained on PR schedules with either linear (PR4) or exponential (PREXP) schedules of reinforcement. PR performance was assessed in response to manipulations in reward outcome. Animals were tested under conditions of increased reward magnitude and following reward devaluation through a prefeeding procedure. Subsequently, the effects of systemic administration of the dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist raclopride and the psychostimulant d-amphetamine were examined as traditional pharmacological methods for manipulating motivation.

          Results

          Rats reinforced under PR4 and PREXP schedules consistently showed differential patterns of response rates within sessions. Furthermore, both PR4 and PREXP schedules were sensitive to suppression by prefeeding or raclopride administration. Performance under both schedules was facilitated by increasing reward magnitude or d-amphetamine administration.

          Conclusions

          Taken together, these findings mirror those observed in lever-based PR paradigms in rats. This study therefore demonstrates the successful validation of the rat touchscreen PR task. This will allow for the assessment of motivation in rats, within the same touchscreen apparatus used for the assessment of complex cognitive processes in this species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience.

          Anhedonia is a core symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD), the neurobiological mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Despite decades of speculation regarding the role of dopamine (DA) in anhedonic symptoms, empirical evidence has remained elusive, with frequent reports of contradictory findings. In the present review, we argue that this has resulted from an underspecified definition of anhedonia, which has failed to dissociate between consummatory and motivational aspects of reward behavior. Given substantial preclinical evidence that DA is involved primarily in motivational aspects of reward, we suggest that a refined definition of anhedonia that distinguishes between deficits in pleasure and motivation is essential for the purposes of identifying its neurobiological substrates. Moreover, bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical models of anhedonia may require moving away from the conceptualization of anhedonia as a steady-state, mood-like phenomena. Consequently, we introduce the term "decisional anhedonia" to address the influence of anhedonia on reward decision-making. These proposed modifications to the theoretical definition of anhedonia have implications for research, assessment and treatment of MDD. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy.

            Drug self-administration studies have recently employed progressive ratio (PR) schedules to examine psychostimulant and opiate reinforcement. This review addresses the technical, statistical, and theoretical issues related to the use of the PR schedule in self-administration studies in rats. Session parameters adopted for use in our laboratory and the considerations relevant to them are described. The strengths and weaknesses of the PR schedule are also discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength.

              W Hodos (1961)
              Four rats were trained to press a lever on a ratio schedule of reinforcement in which the number of lever presses required on each consecutive run increased by a fixed increment. Both concentration and volume of the reward were varied. Relationships were obtained between reward and deprivation variables and the size of the final completed ratio run.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 1223 333550 , jmh241@cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Psychopharmacology (Berl)
                Psychopharmacology (Berl.)
                Psychopharmacology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0033-3158
                1432-2072
                14 July 2018
                14 July 2018
                2018
                : 235
                : 9
                : 2739-2753
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000121885934, GRID grid.5335.0, Department of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, , University of Cambridge, ; Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000096069301, GRID grid.10837.3d, School of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, , The Open University, Walton Hall, ; Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8884, GRID grid.39381.30, Molecular Medicine Research Group, Robarts Research Institute & Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, , Western University, ; London, ON Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8884, GRID grid.39381.30, The Brain and Mind Institute, , Western University, ; London, ON Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-2143
                Article
                4969
                10.1007/s00213-018-4969-6
                6132691
                30008032
                9d482031-1257-4ba2-8c0e-52eb2f6fbba3
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 18 April 2018
                : 5 July 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: 1505392
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Investigation
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                progressive ratio schedule,touchscreen,motivation,rat
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                progressive ratio schedule, touchscreen, motivation, rat

                Comments

                Comment on this article